This is NOT a rumour. This is happening. It is being progressed by the CAA and with much input by the Historic Aircraft Association, and significant reference to content and experience from Part 115 of the New Zealand CAA Venture Aviation initiative. At Wanaka last year you could buy rides in Mustangs, P.40’s , Yaks and others.
just for clarity Wanaka airshow is this year (and rides are being advertised), Omaka and Masterton were last year and had rides available- and available slots sold out on most if not all aircraft offering them. There are several companies offering year round oppotunities.
Yes, I vaguely recall that too, now that you mention it.
However, if Arido did not talk directly to Captain Collins, or did not provide sufficent detail or Captain Collins (or a message taker) did not write down or, for whatever reason, record and pass on the message, or the message got mislaid or misfiled, then the MoD will have no record, and therefore will have ‘not received’ the information.
We all know this sort of misinformation and poor message handling goes on all the time.
Anyway, carry on the search and maybe one day a satisfactory investigation will be reported.
Perhaps the question to Arido should be ‘which authorities?’. Is it possible that the information has been supplied to Italian or Egyptian police or similar and not the UK MoD?
Almost 5 years to the month from joining to first post, I wonder if that is a record? Anyway, hi.
Can’t suggest any websites but do know someone with several DH types for sale (and a couple of ‘others’). where are you based and what are you after or are you selling?
I understand that the radiator in the Hind series aircraft had bungee assisted retraction systems and were normally flown in the fully retracted position (or had a locking mechanisim?). If however the radiator was extended or not locked and the aircraft flown inverted (aerobatics, combat) then between the bungees and gravity there would be a very loud noise as the radiator arrived at it’s stops.
These radiators were a honeycomb of copper tubes held in place by lead solder and quite heavy.
And, as above, just because they were out of general service, did not mean that airframes weren’t available. Were there any service units, trade schools or RAF airfields near Reigate Grammer School that could have had derelict airframes available?
With the folding wings I was thinking Baffin as an alternative, but the engine looks like a double row radial per the Gordon vs. single row Baffin. If the IIIF had folding wings and some Gordons were converted IIIF’s then Lazy8 might be right. Also just realised the Baffin only has a single pair of interplane struts and the picture has 2- like the Gordon.
Did the Gordon have folding wings? Pictures I just saw online don’t show that.
Definately Dove. Given that they weigh about 17lb each, the weight saving would be negligible given the normal empty weight of a Dove- though if enough other ‘stuff’ is removed I suppose it all helps.
Is there not already a website available for this type of funding in the UK? Kickstarter being the biggest I know of in the US and PledgeMe a New Zealand version- http://www.stuff.co.nz/dominion-post/capital-life/7593086/Kiwi-crowd-funding-takes-off
And some very quick research returns many options on google and answers my own question.
Flap track?
Pretty sure it was a SR20 (spent a multi-day cross-country tour as a passenger)- interesting aircraft, found the seat very uncomfortable after a couple of hours- might be great in a high G landing, but you’ll be in pain regardless.
Thought the electronics would be good with someone who really knew how to fly before getting in the aircraft and also knew how to run them.
For someone without a good grasp of the basics- the TV screens are a massive distraction (in fact a massive attraction to fly eyes-in). During the flights I was on, the best approach and landing I saw came at an airfield which was not in the GPS data base and which therefore forced the pilot to really look outside and just fly the aircraft, could not encourage him enough to do so otherwise.
”2, How long has this been certified for use in the UK ? I remember seeing a documentary some years ago, where they
showed it being demonstrated in the US, but said it wasn’t certified for use in the UK yet.”
May not be relevant as the Cirrus was US registered looking at the picture.
Which is why most civilian Skymasters had the rear engine disabled… or at least not run unless the front one quit.
It was not removed due to C/G issues.
So pilots took off in a twin engine aircraft with one engine deliberately shut down just in case it caught fire?
Despite the fact that the rear engine was more efficent due to aerodynamic flow and gave better book figures in an engine out situation?
Biggest risk was inadvertant loss of the rear engine during taxi followed by a single engine take-off (or attempt anyway), corrective technique was to ensure take-off roll was started by advancement of the rear engine first to confirm of operation.
The NZ register has:
3 General Dynamics Allison Convair 340/580
1 General Dynamics Allison Convair 340/5800
5 General Dynamics Allison Convair 440/580