They are all Doves but military ones are called Devons. It depended on who the initial customer was off the production line as to which it can be.
Interior fit was to customer specification so that depended on the user and the role the aircraft fulfilled as to what was fitted.
Enignes depended on Mk/Series – Series 1 and 2 (RNZAF) were 340hp (+6 atmospheres boost, 2800RPM), flat rectangular oil coolers, standard exhausts.
Series 7 and 8 had round oil coolers (per the photo) and augmented exhausts (per photo) which used exhaust thrust to add power (+8 boost, 3100RPM).
Not sure about the series between those.
RNZAF Devons had a flatter perspex canopy, later series or modified aircraft had a higher,solid canopy (per photo) giving more head room and overhead switch panels.
And at least he’s asked in a place where a realistic turret might be found or fabricated.
I can imgine the thread and comments when the program aired and a clearly not lancaster turret featured.
You just can’t win.
David, are you sure you are not adding a 471K purchase price to a rebuild number which already includes a purchase price?
Mackerel- clarity of your numbers please before someone adds anothe 471k to the project!!!
Was it really a B17?, again the guard could have been wrong. If it was a B17 hitting trees would not give the visual described so that leaves the mid-airs (which could also account for 11 dead AND survivors as 2 aircraft would be involved).
Looks retractable to me, also noting that the axle is 180 degrees out from the leg linkage.
Looks retractable to me, also noting that the axle is 180 degrees out from the leg linkage.
do in a yak-52: have too- it’s the seat cushion.
Also note that the AN-2 has a 4 bladed prop (I think) so leaving 1 blade vertical- which is probably safer for pedestrians- leaves the top blade in a position that will accumulate water. Not an issue with 3 blades, which can be left in a Y position- safer for pedestrians and allows for water run off.
However having said that- an aircraft type I fly is however left in the vertical position (safer for ground handling- as tugs, trolleys, gpu, etc can be pushed under the aircraft wing, access to cargo compartment etc) – but where we were origionally required to position the blades in the same place after each flight (there was a painted mark to line up) we are now just required to rotate the blades to the nearest vertical- so that the same blade is not always at the top- that blade was getting more corrosion on all the blades/hubs on all the aircraft across the fleet.
The Moth Minor photos are at North Shore (then Dairy Flat) north of Auckland, NZ. Possibly with Stan Smith in the back seat. The Aircraft is still there in the same paint!
hmmm, thought Tony Paynes’ was in a hanger in Auckland, unless he sold it to aforementioned young fellow. Might be the one from Te Puke, ZK-ALF?
Reading this has been fun.
A few posts earlier sss-666 refers to the “stage” in which he believes the moon landings were acted out. I point this out as he had much earlier been refering to the flag waving due to wind. Did they have the doors open or big fans? – which would have blown dust as well.
Guess this means I believe the landings happen.
Regarding the dangling cables if it was a flat cable i.e. 1 in. by 1/8 in. for example, and was twisted, it would give the impression of being under the shadow of the lander leg.
Is not the reflection of light from the space suits themselves sufficient to brighten the shadowed side of the lander when taking the photo of the “United States”?
P.S. For those still wondering about SSS-666’s nationality I think you will find he is American but does not wish to be refered to as a Yank(ee) or red-neck.
Reading this has been fun.
A few posts earlier sss-666 refers to the “stage” in which he believes the moon landings were acted out. I point this out as he had much earlier been refering to the flag waving due to wind. Did they have the doors open or big fans? – which would have blown dust as well.
Guess this means I believe the landings happen.
Regarding the dangling cables if it was a flat cable i.e. 1 in. by 1/8 in. for example, and was twisted, it would give the impression of being under the shadow of the lander leg.
Is not the reflection of light from the space suits themselves sufficient to brighten the shadowed side of the lander when taking the photo of the “United States”?
P.S. For those still wondering about SSS-666’s nationality I think you will find he is American but does not wish to be refered to as a Yank(ee) or red-neck.
Thought the ply problem had more to do with the glue used, being water soluable with prolonged exposure. Would think modern glue and longer construction times (better setting and perfect assembly) would provide a longer lasting product. Also new builds will be hangared and flown under more restrictive conditions.
Later articles and close second hand info report the diversion to Ohakea due to weather followed by a downwind landing resulting in a skid and wing contact with the runway, the undercarriage then collapsed. Serious damage to the aircraft but no injuries thankfully.
Having consulted a Single Engine service ceiling graph it gives 4500′ at AUW and ISA. So 4000′ as drift down should be ok if flown correctly… from experience no chance of climbing to the book figure on one engine.
Ref 4 seats, thats only for symmetry, 3 plus fuel for 3 hours and bags was ok much like many 4 seat aircraft. The practicality of it was a cheap twin for training, who needs extra seats for that? As a trainer it was/is quite good.