dark light

steve_p

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 406 through 420 (of 596 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: Question for the Hudson fans #1290439
    steve_p
    Participant

    Thanks for the input chaps. The person who took the photo was a civilian professional photographer, which leads me to think that the photo was taken during a press open day at Leuchars at some point during 1940.

    Although the caption (which was written many years after the photographer died) refers to the group as “RAF aircrew”, I’m wondering if this is a mistake and that some of the individuals are civilians, perhaps reporters about to be given a flight in a Hudson? A couple of them seem to be be wearing dark suits underneath their outer garments, and civilian passengers although needing to keep their ears warm, would have no other need for a flying helmet. 🙂

    The photo comes from a substantial archive held in St Andrews University Library (the Cowie Collection). It consists of thousands of glass negatives of anything and everything that the late Mr Cowie thought interesting. He must have had a good relationship with RAF Leuchars because he was able to photograph many of the types that were based there from the 1930s to the 1960s – he even managed to wangle a flight in an Overstand to photograph another one over the Tay Estuary 🙂 . Unfortunately, few of his aviation shots have been digitised yet, but a small selection can be viewed at the St Andrews Library website – just type in “Leuchars” in the search engine.

    Best wishes
    Steve P

    in reply to: Uk Fairey Battle and New Harvard arrives…(Zombie 2006) #1298228
    steve_p
    Participant

    As for stripping out guns/armour etc as the battle did not have any armour plate fitted/or self sealing fuel tanks and was ony fitted with one foward firing 303 browning and one lewis gun for rear defense there would not be much weight to be gained by not fitting her out with wartime equipment.

    Err, weren’t a few Canadian Battles modified to take a Bristol turret?

    Best wishes
    Steve P

    in reply to: Flight Magazine 1909-1911 #1299900
    steve_p
    Participant
    in reply to: UK Gate Guardians #1303628
    steve_p
    Participant

    As well as the F,4, Leuchars also has a Tornado F.3 on the gate. There were, a few months ago at least, a couple of other Phantoms at the base.

    Best wishes
    Steve P

    in reply to: webmaster?!? #1304777
    steve_p
    Participant

    Can’t you use Photobucket?

    Best wishes
    Steve P

    in reply to: Martin Baker MB5 #1325873
    steve_p
    Participant

    Interesting similarities between MB 5, Mustang, and the best of all of them,

    []

    SUPERMARINE SPITEFULL

    TELL ME DIFFERENT!!!!

    Err, isn’t that a Seafang?

    Ugly little begger innit. :dev2:

    Best wishes
    Steve P

    in reply to: One for the Merlin experts #1332490
    steve_p
    Participant

    Vacuum pump drive?

    Best wishes
    Steve P

    in reply to: . . .and Spitfire relic trawled from the Channel #1247156
    steve_p
    Participant

    Photo was taken earlier this year at East Fortune (Frightning in background).

    Best wishes
    Steve P

    in reply to: . . .and Spitfire relic trawled from the Channel #1247520
    steve_p
    Participant

    Just speculating but, couldn’t the prop be from Bristol Freighter G-AIFF?

    Best wishes
    Steve P

    in reply to: . . .and Spitfire relic trawled from the Channel #1247530
    steve_p
    Participant

    Here’s a post-war Hercules:

    http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v489/grumpos/004_30.jpg

    Best wishes
    Steve P

    in reply to: Four bladed wooden propellor Identification Help #1247789
    steve_p
    Participant

    I’ve read somewhere, very recently, about problems with the Halifax (IIRC) that were cured/helped by fitting four-bladed props. Owing to a shortage they were sometimes fitted to the inner engines only which was enough to reduce the problem. Would they have been Rotol or DH?

    It’s mentioned in “The Merlin In Perspective”, published by the Rolls Royce Heritage Trust. I’ve forgotten what was said though…

    Seem to recall reading that there were not enough four bladers to go around so some halibags only received one instead of the required two. 😮

    Best wishes
    Steve P

    in reply to: Waffle about remaking The dambusters #1267949
    steve_p
    Participant

    Moving away from yet another WW2 film…

    What about a movie about some of the exploits of Sir Alan Cobham?

    Best wishes
    Steve P

    in reply to: Merlin engine mark Nos? #1270072
    steve_p
    Participant

    The shift for aircraft mark nos was postwar – and is documented, PR.XIX upto then, PR.19 after. No one’s offering the engine equivalent?

    Did the early wartime Meteors have anything other than Arabic designations? I don’t recall ever seeing Meteor F.3s being referred to as Mk.IIIs.

    Best wishes
    Steve P

    in reply to: Merlin engine mark Nos? #1270099
    steve_p
    Participant

    Either that ,or the only person to have a full set of letter stamps was Ellor, and when he went to the US (to over see Packards production) ,he took them with him (although unused), leaving Rolls Royce in a pickle; they were then forced to buy a new set of stamps (from Halfords probably) and the rest is history!! (who says revisionism can’t be fun)

    Good theory. 😀

    He must have taken Bristol’s stamps as well, because later Hercules powerplants also had Arabic designations.

    Best wishes
    Steve P

    in reply to: Most beautiful jet #1270828
    steve_p
    Participant

    FD.2 by a mile. 🙂

    Best wishes
    Steve P

Viewing 15 posts - 406 through 420 (of 596 total)