Agree with Blenheim. I think that I can make out the blisters on one of the engine cowls.
I hope to get a copy of the Panther Handbook some day….any idea about where to look?
The National Archives at Kew have a copy according to Google.
Thanks Seafuryfan. Now that is really smart! It’d be a great way of getting top views and unusual angles on aircraft in museums though I suspect one would get chucked out if they tried it 🙂
A monopod would probably be cheaper.
……is it a general consensus that these pics represent Day Bomber paint schemes?…..or white bottomed TSS?
I would say that they are trainers in Canada and the undersides are yellow.
Oops, just read Webpilot’s post, so scrap the Canada bit. Still think that it is a trainer scheme in the first pic though.
Not sure what the range of a Mosquito is but would it be easier to ship her over here? Or in the back of a C130?
They have flown accross the Atlantic before so I don’t see how it would be a problem now.
Its a black and white photo so I would be careful about assigning particular colours. The undersides look white but what the uppersurfaces and tail are is anybody’s guess. Wellesleys were used as an anti-shipping weapon around this time. and as such, I would have expected them to have carried a maritime scheme if they were repainted at all. hence my original comment. Blenheims had their upper surfaces repainted when their role changed, why not Wellesleys? I have assumed that the dark parts of the undersides are in the shade or due to the removal of fabric. Perhaps the original photo would give us a few more clues. I have no idea who owns it though.
Yep, it could have been a painting exercise, sadly we just don’t know. Unless someone is sitting on a photo of an anti-shipping Wellesley…
Could this be it?
Vickers Wellesley. L2657, reduced to 4712M Photo.bw 1942 1988 1 24
That’s the one. The aircraft has had it’s outer wings hacked off and the prop removed. Its a small photo so probably will not scan well.
Yep. Aeromilitaria. Probably early 1980s Graham.
Veri interesting thread, thanks for kicking off the discussion Stepwilk
Is this really true? Mosquitos making more than one trip into Germany in a single night?
BOAC mossies sometimes did more than one return flight a night on the Leuchars – Stockholm run.
Beaufighter was less prone to break up when ditching – a feature appreciated by Coastal Command crews.
Quite a few years ago one of the Air Britain magazines published a photo of a sorry looking Welesley sitting on a dump, somewhere in the Middle East, around about 1942. The aircraft was clearly sporting a maritime scheme (white sides and undersides). Presumably this scheme had been applied when the Welesley undertook anti-submarine patrols in the Gulf.
The codes therefore are the previous grey ones not the red ones, and then the colours at least show consistently, although I don’t know which filter would make the red appear so light. A red filter?
Yes. A red or orange filter lightens red and darkens blue. They were often used to increase contrast in skies.
I still think the Spiteful is best as it has the coolest name, but the OP won’t allow that. His thread, his rules.
Moggy
But the Spiteful looked all wrong, therefore it cannot have been the best.
Still a bit strange that the Gemans painted the Dutch roundel above the fist 2 victory marks while the Dutch used a orange triangle during the time the 2 aircraft were shot down. ( A fokker T.V and a Fokker G.10
I assumed that it was a Czech roundel.
but still it better to have aircraft with better performance , a zero trying to fight a bear cat will pretty much end up being shot down
And quite often a Zero trying to fight a Wildcat would get shot down. Air warfare quite often does not go by the book. Read up on the RAAF experiences after they swapped their P5!s for Meteors in Korea.