It depends on the engine. Which one do you want info on?
Best wishes
Steve P
What about a static Barracuda? The FAA Museum have done a fantastic job on the Albacore. Could they repeat it with a Barra?
Best wishes
Steve P
I would have thought that a Whitley would be eminently doable.
Best wishes
Steve P
Great pics. 😀
I think that the Hornet shot would be later than June 1944 though.
Best wishes
Steve P
What was the wing area then?
304 sq feet. Wing loading 37 lb/sq ft.
Best wishes
Steve P
To answer my own question, wing area was 12.5 per cent greater than that of the Spitfire and the tare weight was 8,769 lb. A top speed of 465 mph at 22,000 ft was claimed.
A version powered by Bristol Taurus engines was also considered.
Source: Interceptor Fighters For The Royal Air Force 1939-45
Michael J.F. Bowyer
Best wishes
Steve P
Span aint everything though. What was the wing area?
Best wishes
SteveP
I thought that one of the problems was due to sloppy procedures on the US production lines. I’m sure that it involved the US workers emptying their cups of Coke into the manufacturing machinery. 😮
Best wishes
Steve P
Cranswick,
According to the 305 FTU (Errol) ORB, three Mossies were used by the unit, only one eventually going to the Soviet Union. The first, DZ349, was only with the unit for about a month during aug/sept 1943. Of the other two, HJ961 was used to train the ferry crew, while DK296 which arrived at Errol 12/8/43 sat about waiting to depart.
DK296 finally departed at 01.34 hrs DBST on 20/4/44, arriving at Moscow at 04.52 hrs GMT. The crew comprised Sen/Lt Polosouchin (pilot), and Lt Kekishev (navigator).
The primary role of 305 FTU was to prepare Russian crews for the ferrying of Albermarles to the Soviet Union, and once training was complete, to despatch them via the northern route over the Baltic. By the time of the Mosquito delivery flight, the Albermarle deliveries had ended, and once the Mossie left, the unit rapidly closed down.
Best wishes
Steve P
The unit that despatched Albermarles to the Soviets (305 FTU) also sent a Mossie. I have a copy of the ORB somewhere so can dig out the details if you want.
Best wishes
Steve P
I think that this topic was also covered by Henshaw in a set of articles in Aeroplane Monthly at some point in the 1980s. If I remember correctly, the fault occured with Packard Merlins.
Best wishes
Steve P
Always thought that the pressurised Wellingtons looked pretty odd. What were the designers at Weybridge in the early 1940s drinking?
http://www.rafweb.org/SqnMark106-110.htm
(2/3 down the page)
Best wishes
Steve P
Australian experience found that by increasing fin and rudder area by 15.5%, the problem was fixed. This information was made available to Bristol in late 1941 and the subsequent British built aircraft were so rectified.
Are you sure? I thought that only the Aussie Beauforts had the enlarged fin and rudder.
Best wishes
Steve P
Vickers 432 looked pretty odd. It’s flying characteristics were similar. 😮
Best wishes
Steve P
The Airspeed AS.31 gets my vote. Thankfully, like most of the Luftwaffe jet projects, it never progressed beyond the drawing board.
http://www.fantastic-plastic.com/AIRSPEED%20AS31%20PAGE.htm
Best wishes
Steve P