dark light

steve_p

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 511 through 525 (of 596 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: Engines #231451
    steve_p
    Participant

    It depends on the engine. Which one do you want info on?

    Best wishes
    Steve P

    in reply to: The future ten years from now, extinct types resurfacing? #1388181
    steve_p
    Participant

    What about a static Barracuda? The FAA Museum have done a fantastic job on the Albacore. Could they repeat it with a Barra?

    Best wishes
    Steve P

    in reply to: The future ten years from now, extinct types resurfacing? #1388363
    steve_p
    Participant

    I would have thought that a Whitley would be eminently doable.

    Best wishes
    Steve P

    in reply to: HMS Victorious June44 #1391711
    steve_p
    Participant

    Great pics. 😀

    I think that the Hornet shot would be later than June 1944 though.

    Best wishes
    Steve P

    in reply to: Twin-engined tricycle undercarriage WWII fighter #1392079
    steve_p
    Participant

    What was the wing area then?

    304 sq feet. Wing loading 37 lb/sq ft.

    Best wishes
    Steve P

    in reply to: Twin-engined tricycle undercarriage WWII fighter #1392256
    steve_p
    Participant

    To answer my own question, wing area was 12.5 per cent greater than that of the Spitfire and the tare weight was 8,769 lb. A top speed of 465 mph at 22,000 ft was claimed.

    A version powered by Bristol Taurus engines was also considered.

    Source: Interceptor Fighters For The Royal Air Force 1939-45
    Michael J.F. Bowyer

    Best wishes
    Steve P

    in reply to: Twin-engined tricycle undercarriage WWII fighter #1392406
    steve_p
    Participant

    Span aint everything though. What was the wing area?

    Best wishes
    SteveP

    in reply to: Spitfire V Skewgear Failure #1393192
    steve_p
    Participant

    I thought that one of the problems was due to sloppy procedures on the US production lines. I’m sure that it involved the US workers emptying their cups of Coke into the manufacturing machinery. 😮

    Best wishes
    Steve P

    in reply to: RAAF Hawker Typhoon in Western Desert #1393219
    steve_p
    Participant

    Cranswick,

    According to the 305 FTU (Errol) ORB, three Mossies were used by the unit, only one eventually going to the Soviet Union. The first, DZ349, was only with the unit for about a month during aug/sept 1943. Of the other two, HJ961 was used to train the ferry crew, while DK296 which arrived at Errol 12/8/43 sat about waiting to depart.

    DK296 finally departed at 01.34 hrs DBST on 20/4/44, arriving at Moscow at 04.52 hrs GMT. The crew comprised Sen/Lt Polosouchin (pilot), and Lt Kekishev (navigator).

    The primary role of 305 FTU was to prepare Russian crews for the ferrying of Albermarles to the Soviet Union, and once training was complete, to despatch them via the northern route over the Baltic. By the time of the Mosquito delivery flight, the Albermarle deliveries had ended, and once the Mossie left, the unit rapidly closed down.

    Best wishes
    Steve P

    in reply to: RAAF Hawker Typhoon in Western Desert #1393424
    steve_p
    Participant

    The unit that despatched Albermarles to the Soviets (305 FTU) also sent a Mossie. I have a copy of the ORB somewhere so can dig out the details if you want.

    Best wishes
    Steve P

    in reply to: Spitfire V Skewgear Failure #1395942
    steve_p
    Participant

    I think that this topic was also covered by Henshaw in a set of articles in Aeroplane Monthly at some point in the 1980s. If I remember correctly, the fault occured with Packard Merlins.

    Best wishes
    Steve P

    in reply to: Strangest RAF aircraft of World War 2. #1396564
    steve_p
    Participant

    Always thought that the pressurised Wellingtons looked pretty odd. What were the designers at Weybridge in the early 1940s drinking?

    http://www.rafweb.org/SqnMark106-110.htm

    (2/3 down the page)

    Best wishes
    Steve P

    in reply to: Aussie Beaus #1400401
    steve_p
    Participant

    Australian experience found that by increasing fin and rudder area by 15.5%, the problem was fixed. This information was made available to Bristol in late 1941 and the subsequent British built aircraft were so rectified.

    Are you sure? I thought that only the Aussie Beauforts had the enlarged fin and rudder.

    Best wishes
    Steve P

    in reply to: Strangest RAF aircraft of World War 2. #1401475
    steve_p
    Participant

    Vickers 432 looked pretty odd. It’s flying characteristics were similar. 😮

    Best wishes
    Steve P

    in reply to: Strangest RAF aircraft of World War 2. #1401528
    steve_p
    Participant

    The Airspeed AS.31 gets my vote. Thankfully, like most of the Luftwaffe jet projects, it never progressed beyond the drawing board.

    http://www.fantastic-plastic.com/AIRSPEED%20AS31%20PAGE.htm

    Best wishes
    Steve P

Viewing 15 posts - 511 through 525 (of 596 total)