I’ll go for RAF Hurries flying off Beachy Head.
Best wishes
Steve P
Yep, looks great. Starboard entry door too 🙂
Best wishes
Steve P
What about the early Typhoon? The only pictures that I have seen with the door open show a starboard door. Was there one on the other side as well?
Best wishes
Steve P
Mossie was starboard. Canberra too.
Best wishes
Steve P
Could have been a DC.2.
Best wishes
Steve P
Try this:
http://www.afterthebattle.com/home.htm
Hendon can also provide photocopies of plans of many RAF airfields but they are more expensive than the After the Battle sets.
Best wishes
Steve P
The actions of Grumman in demanding payment for the use of the names such as Wildcat and Avenger were a bit dubious, and looked a bit like ideas dreamed up by company lawyers, acting to justify their salaries. I don’t think that their policy has been tested in the courts because the software developers, when faced with potentially expensive legal actions, have paid up.
Regarding the Russian plans, I’d rather get them from a magazine. Unfortunately, the magazine copyright usually prohibits me from scanning them into my computer, which is not very useful when I am building a 3D model. Any chance of modifying the copyright blurb to allow the use of your printed plans in 3D modelling JDK?
Best wishes
Steve P
Cheers for the advice JDK. I’ll get an email off to Fred. Given that he worked on the Welkin, he should be able to help. Gut feeling is that the manifolds will be standard.
Best wishes
Steve P
Geez Toby, I’m not as old as the Vickers Vulcan. 😀 Many names have been reused over the years. Strange that the Swordfish was a development of the TSR.2. 😮
Best wishes
Steve P
Toby,
The Supermarine Sea Eagle was a 1920s amphibian. The fuselage was preserved for some years after it disappeared from service, but was ultimately burnt.
Lee Holmes made a nice model of one for Microsoft Flight Simulator 9.
The Armstrong Whitworth Scimitar was another 1920-1930s aircraft that could/should have been saved.
Best wishes
Steve P
Or the Bristol Superfreighter.
Best wishes
Steve P
I would go with Janie on this one, but 5 Frogfoots just doesn’t seem right. :confused:
Best wishes
Steve P
I asked about photography there when I last visited and was told that the only restriction was that I would have to sign a form if I intended using a tripod. Presumably, a tripod = professional = money that we are not getting.
Best wishes
Steve P
I was at East Fortune a couple of weeks ago, the thing that struck me was how photographer unfriendly the hangars were! The exhibits were either crammed together or had large banners to the front or side of them!
I was there a couple of months ago and felt the same way. I was rather miffed to find that the Miles aircraft that I had specifically come to photograph were packed together in a dark, dirty and almost photography proof hanger.
I fail to see what purpose the banners serve, other than to make photographing some of the exhibits impossible. I wonder if this is a deliberate policy, or is whoever was responsible for installing them just clueless?
I will not be rushing back there in a hurry.
Best wishes
Steve P
I’ve heard RAF chaps refer to the VC.10 as the Vickers Funbus.
Best wishes
Steve P