dark light

Mr Merry

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 331 through 345 (of 1,048 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: Possessed! By DEMONS! #1874282
    Mr Merry
    Participant

    What a load of tosh. Has the police officer been on drugs?

    in reply to: Celebrity #1874290
    Mr Merry
    Participant

    A young brat with no talent and too much money. A bit like One Direction, or as I call them the wrong direction.
    As for a celebrity? See the line above:rolleyes:

    in reply to: Smoking #1874293
    Mr Merry
    Participant

    I smoke, cigars rather than cigarettes, not that point matters.
    However I would never smoke in a car nor indoors if kids were about. I don’t smoke inside anyway, kids or not. Bring in a new law? I don’t think thats the answer. It’s attitudes that that need to change rather than the law.

    in reply to: Benefits Street #1874299
    Mr Merry
    Participant

    Re post 159.

    Hats off to you John.

    But if the unemployed are made to do a job then that shows a a job needs doing. Is it manufacturing a job? Yes, I would say so. So how could we pay for these ‘manufactured jobs’? Simple stop sending aid abroad, India springs to mind.

    TBH, I can’t get my head around why someone wouldn’t want to work. I have been made redundant twice and have been back in work in days, The first time I took a crap job (shovelling literally crap) not a nice job, but it was a job.
    The second time I set up a business, the best thing I have ever done. I work between 12-16 hours a day but I’m not moaning.

    in reply to: Andrew Woodhouse not guilty #1874480
    Mr Merry
    Participant

    Well none of us where there

    Nore were you. Two to one isn’t vigilantism, it’s self defence.

    in reply to: Credibility now damaged beyond repair #1874484
    Mr Merry
    Participant

    No chance of fridge magnet for me, the ‘war department’ got a fridge behind a door. 🙁

    in reply to: Benefits Street #1874488
    Mr Merry
    Participant

    John, people working for their benefits isn’t the answer. If there is a job that needs doing. Pay them to do it.
    I have never agreed with people working for benefits. A job is a job, pay the person for doing it.

    Feckless scroungers is something else.

    in reply to: Andrew Woodhouse not guilty #1874495
    Mr Merry
    Participant

    It’s legal to kill a scum bag if your life is in danger. I think they got away lightly.

    in reply to: Three arrested for stealing… #1874499
    Mr Merry
    Participant

    As an after thought how can goods be worth £33 if they are in a bin?

    Fair play to Iceland who have said that’s it’s nothing to do with them.

    in reply to: Three arrested for stealing… #1874522
    Mr Merry
    Participant

    Sorry, I missed this thread. I did reply on another one.

    “Ah the CPS at it again,
    The ones that thought it a good idea to do 3 guys because they took some food from a bin.
    They have now (the CPS) have dropped the case.”

    A link to the case http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-25950761

    in reply to: The Official F1 Thread #1874529
    Mr Merry
    Participant

    The ladies won though 🙂

    And not for the first time, well done them:eagerness:

    However there was a lot of good overtakes in 2013;

    http://www.bbc.co.uk/sport/0/formula1/25476335

    Not enough overtakes though, However Vettel seems to be having a struggle with his new car.

    But how is a V6 turbo cutting costs?

    in reply to: Andrew Woodhouse not guilty #1874532
    Mr Merry
    Participant

    Ah the CPS at it again,
    The ones that thought it a good idea to do 3 guys because they took some food from a bin.
    They have now (the CPS) have dropped the case.

    A link to the case http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-25950761

    Breaking two arms and a leg serves the guy right, if he wasn’t out stealing he wouldn’t have had his limbs broken.

    in reply to: Benefits Street #1874535
    Mr Merry
    Participant

    instead of making people do voluntary work … or however you want to word it, for their benefits, why not just turn those ‘voluntary’ positions into proper working positions and pay the claimant a wage… then they could come off benefits…. or is that too sensible?

    I agree, if a job needs doing pay a proper wage to do it. It’s simple, if I need a job doing I pay someone to do it.

    in reply to: Fifty Years of King Airs #390228
    Mr Merry
    Participant

    Don’t forget the Queen Air as well.

    in reply to: 'ANG EM !!! #1875770
    Mr Merry
    Participant

    The reason I believe we do not have the right to kill someone is because it is inhumane.
    While their actions may be inhumane I do not see why killing the perpetrator makes the sentence just and not just revenge.
    I also don’t understand why the family of the victim would want the perpetrator killed for any other reason than revenge.
    How can it be just to kill those that have killed?

    I’ll throw the question back at you. Why do you think the death penalty is anything other than revenge?

    Take Sutcliffe for example, if he had killed my mother, call it revenge if you want, I would be more than happy to kill him myself. Revenge? Justice? Call it what you will.

Viewing 15 posts - 331 through 345 (of 1,048 total)