dark light

Mo Botwood

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 46 through 60 (of 68 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: Shackleton Carrier Landing Myth! #1143037
    Mo Botwood
    Participant

    richw_82

    Not too sure, she was always in good trim and she was very easy to handle.
    I heard many comments about her performance.
    My favourite.

    Mo

    in reply to: Shackleton Carrier Landing Myth! #1143076
    Mo Botwood
    Participant

    Hi All

    It seems to getting complicated – so I revert to the old logbook again. Please remember that these were countersigned each months by world class pedants and were treated as mid term exams.
    My Mark I time – from 1955 to 1962 had entries that showed only MR1 and GR1; depending on the current Flight Commander.
    After we picked up WG555 “Triple Nickel” (accepted as the fastest Shackleton Ever), there followed six months of entries that differentiated between MkII and MkIIc to show if you were qualified on type.
    At this stage, I think that the ‘c’ eventually ended up as Phase 1 – a classification I never heard in the rest of my time until 1966.
    I had a rush posting as a Cat ‘T’ instructor to 205/209 Squadron to convert Sigs and AEOs onto the new Avionics fit. An unnecessary rush as the first MkII – a MkIIc, did not arrive on 205 until months before I was posted back to 210 at BK.
    For the next four years my logbook entries were MkIIc or GRIIc until leaving the Squadron.
    The MkIIc received the advaced avioncs at the same time as the Mk3 was being upgraded – so that was the START of the Phase2.
    First prize of a 7 hour flight in a Bristol Frightener with a leaky carboy of Sulphuric acid (another story) to the first one to say “I can understand that”

    Mo

    in reply to: Shackleton Carrier Landing Myth! #1143270
    Mo Botwood
    Participant

    Hi Nashio

    I think it boils down to:

    First MkII = Phase 1

    MkIIc = Conversion to new Avionics – Phase 2

    MkII Phase 3 = Coversion to MkIII innards.

    Mo

    in reply to: Shackleton Carrier Landing Myth! #1143285
    Mo Botwood
    Participant

    The MkIIc first appeared in my logbook when we picked up WG555 from Langar on 4th April 1959. She was one of the first with the upgraded electronic fit – ASV21 etc.

    That’s the way the management wanted it to be noted and that’s the way it had to be.

    Mo

    in reply to: RAF Night bombing #1122714
    Mo Botwood
    Participant

    This might be in the later stages of the night campaign, but historically, the German night defences had never caught the Mosquito to any great extent.

    “The Mossie has a special place in the RAF’s history

    The Light Night Striking Force of Mosquitos during one phase of the war made bombing raids to Berlin on 43 consecutive occasions without a break. Sometimes the same aircraft would make a second raid on the same night. The Light Night Striking Force flew 553 sorties during April 1943 for the loss of only one aircraft.

    The LNSF used to operate in the most appalling weather and one night Air Vice Marshal Donald Bennett was visited by Mrs. Ogden Reid of the New York Herald Tribune. She had asked to witness the start of a raid. This distinguished lady of the American press arrived with a member of the British Government and was immediately driven to the end of the runway by Bennett. Fog caused heavy bomber raids to be cancelled but as the mist swirled around the signal caravan at the end of the runway Mosquitos could be seen taxying on from both directions to save time, lining up and taking off for Berlin in quick succession. She turned to Bennett and said, “I see they have got a bulge – they’re carrying a “Blockbuster” aren’t they?” She asked what it weighed and Bennett told her 4000 lbs which was 500 lbs more than a B-17 Flying Fortress could carry to Berlin. In any case, he pointed out, a Fortress would not accommodate a 4000 lb “cookie” because it was too large for its bomb bay. The famous Press lady pondered for a few moments before replying “I only hope the American public never realises these facts.”

    One young Mosquito pilot of those days was Wing Commander 1. G. Broom (later Air Marshal Sir Ivor Broom DSO, DFC and two bars, AFC). “We did 25 nights to Berlin. You could fly there and be back in the mess before the bar closed. We could carry more to Berlin with a crew of two in a Mosquito than could a Flying Fortress with a crew of ten. They had to fight their way there and back in daylight. We went fast at night, at 28,000 ft.”

    in reply to: "What If" – an MR-1 Shackleton??? #1128626
    Mo Botwood
    Participant

    Since my last post, there have been very good points raised and made.

    In 1987 with the retirement of the AEW2 approaching and VP293 still extant; moves were made to get aviation magazines to look at the concept of lobbying for airframes while they were being maintained by their service owner. Their main response was that all efforts should be directed to supporting the enthusiasts who were “restoring” a Hurricane from a carburretor found in the Romney Marshes.

    The sale of the 8 Squadron AEWs in 1992 was a new approach to preseving a type. Unfortunately it took them away from the true enthusiasts and left them in the hands of owners who quickly lost interest and abandoned them. WL747 had completed a full spar replacement only 18 months before sale.

    The thoughts of the crew that flew XF708 into Duxford left all their maps and Nav instruments in situ so that all could see the human connection to the beast. That thoughtful move was neutralised and the IWM now faces the tremendous restoration/presevation task after her 58 years in the open.

    Other threads cover the disposition of the Nimrod airframes at the same time as their retirement, meaning that maximum preservation can be achieved. Let’s hope that this will be the future so that we can expect the task to be preservation rather than restoration or modification.

    And a Happy Easter to all,

    Mo

    in reply to: "What If" – an MR-1 Shackleton??? #1129428
    Mo Botwood
    Participant

    P.S. Sorry:

    But never take-off or landing.

    Mo

    in reply to: "What If" – an MR-1 Shackleton??? #1129431
    Mo Botwood
    Participant

    The first one who could justify it!

    Mo

    in reply to: "What If" – an MR-1 Shackleton??? #1129558
    Mo Botwood
    Participant

    …they’d still look better preserved as MR.2’s though… Blue 2

    I agree – but there are no MarkIs around at all. As founder of the Shackleton Association and Editor of the Growler, I blew my top when I was informed (in Vanuatu) that VP293 had been scrapped without prior notice. Cosford had WB832 for 6 years – in a Hangar, before scrapping her in 1980. They now have no Shackleton in their Cold war collection. Despite trashing three MarkIIIs AFTER their sale to private buyers.

    As a past user, I have always counted the MarkII as the definitive Shack and never thought of the MarkIII as a real Shack at all.

    I split my 10 years between the One and Two – but the MkI was the best. The MkII with upgraded systems was a more competent ASW platform, but we were never given the chance to prove what the much lighter MkI would have done with the same fit.

    The MkII has always looked great, in fact I used the MarkII as a logo at the start of the Growler in 1987.

    But there is nothing as neat or as pugilistic as a MarkI at low level on full power and there never will be.

    The question of “is it worth it?” Has been answered using many views, including cost and credibility. I do not think Mark had all those problematic answers in mind when he asked the question.

    I sit at 73, still starkly remembering my years on the type and I must admit when I think of preservation of aircraft; I think of the hours on the front settee in the nose, with the most magnificent view in the world.

    I have to say again:

    “Oooohh!!! Wouldn’t it be luvverrly!! But there again – I’m only a boring old fart.

    Mo

    in reply to: "What If" – an MR-1 Shackleton??? #1131221
    Mo Botwood
    Participant

    As you say REF

    Norman Thelwell has had 293’s nose at Duxford for a couple of years and should be in the UK around now – hopefully organising its future accommodation.

    Mo

    in reply to: "What If" – an MR-1 Shackleton??? #1131322
    Mo Botwood
    Participant

    Oh wouldn’t it be luvverly!

    Mo

    in reply to: Stolen bomber crashes 1955 #1134278
    Mo Botwood
    Participant

    One morning in 1954 at 0530 at No1 ASS Swanton Morely, we were awakened and paraded. Our Sergeant addressed the huddling masses with the words “Alright! Own up, who pinched a Prentice?” Later that day, the news was passed around that it had been found intact in a very small field in Belgium – they had to dismantle it to get it back.

    10 months later at 2 ANS we came back from a night in Pompey and were told that we had one of our Varsities taken (Nav trainers only, no bombing equip) and eventually heard of its demise in France.

    The tale of the C130 was passed around the squadrons later. It included the information it had been caught after threatening to drop on Buckingham Palace and the RAF fighters were ordered out of the Channel Isles area where it had been cornered. When they were cleared back in; they saw the F-4s coming out and a huge oil slick in the area. Apparently the States had requested that they look after their own.

    Mo

    in reply to: How Many Of You Would Like To See A Shackleton Fly Again #1135437
    Mo Botwood
    Participant

    Yokes

    Here’s two for comparison. The Lancaster with a background and a Mark One Shack. There is some similarity, which changes with a more rectangular MarkII and MarkIII.

    in reply to: Fun With The Shack Boys & Stealthy Peek At Classic Flight #1113842
    Mo Botwood
    Participant

    Wyvernfan,

    I don’t think so at this stage, the important thing is that the plans for preservation are still in place.

    On your favourite subject; do the photos from the 50s still exist of the 5 Wyverns stuck nose in the ground after landing at Ford (still with Carrier pressure in their tyres), all in perfect line abreast. Also the classic of one stuck in Eagle’s funnel during the Med cruise in 1955?
    Mo

    in reply to: Fun With The Shack Boys & Stealthy Peek At Classic Flight #1115306
    Mo Botwood
    Participant

    WL790

    Nashio.

    I have received assurance from Pima that:
    …. [I][FONT=”Arial”]“nothing has happened to WL790. The plan is on track to paint the Shack next summer when the new restoration hangar is finished. The only thing taken out of 790 other than draining the gas is the batteries.”

    Mo Botwood

Viewing 15 posts - 46 through 60 (of 68 total)