dark light

smirky

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 1 through 15 (of 748 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: Aircraft Instrument Panel Projects #1159303
    smirky
    Member

    Lancaster II

    Getting there now…..

    in reply to: Aircraft Instrument Panel Projects #1159181
    smirky
    Member

    4 engines, 2 wings, rest of the fuselage and enough land to make a runway:D

    in reply to: 1940 Combat Reports #1153157
    smirky
    Member

    Is the poor English and bad grammar seen here usual in the genuine items?

    in reply to: Avro Vulcan XL319 Restoration Project #1152124
    smirky
    Member

    Just a thought, everyone is assuming that it will come “crashing down” when the snow/sleepers are removed.

    This may not be enough, if the c of g is now aft of a line perpendicular to the pivot point then it may well be semi-stable in its current attitude.

    in reply to: 1940 Combat Reports #1151527
    smirky
    Member

    he has had the item carbon dated

    :rolleyes:
    I thought it was a top copy 😀

    in reply to: Seen On Ebay Thread #1149392
    smirky
    Member
    in reply to: Avro Vulcan XL319 Restoration Project #1148607
    smirky
    Member

    Sven, good stuff. If you also know the height of the main gear, you could work out the c of g in the tipped position relative to the wheels and therefore roughly how much down push if any will be required to get it started.

    in reply to: 1940 Combat Reports #1147725
    smirky
    Member

    I have had a reply from the sender who confirms that he has had the item carbon dated and verified as genuine.

    angelsonefive, thanks for your contribution. Would you also like also to clear up the issue above which has been received with bafflement and a degree of incredulity?

    in reply to: Seen On Ebay Thread #1147599
    smirky
    Member
    in reply to: 1940 Combat Reports #1146545
    smirky
    Member

    I have “invested” in three printouts of the combat reports above :rolleyes:

    I am not an expert, but I would say that these three stand or fall together since they have apparently been typed on the same machine – note for example how it tends to throw the B slightly high.

    in reply to: Fuel gauge ID please? #1145539
    smirky
    Member

    It doesn’t hold much does it?
    :rolleyes:

    Two 25s and an 18 gallon.

    in reply to: Dangerous instruments again (yes I know) #1134505
    smirky
    Member

    mesathoriums are decay product of thorium and produce isotopes of either radium and actinium = both radioactive – but with a shorter half life. 2 years cf 1600 years

    The radiation decay of radium is alpha and beta – the issue here is the beta. Fortunately not gamma.

    mesa thorium and radium are both beta emitters.

    Most radiation detectors do not pick up alpha – only beta. Most alpha will not get through the instrument casing and glass.

    So the issue with instruments is beta emission – Either avoid/remove them or shield them.”

    There is a degree of confusion and inaccuracy creeping in here.:mad:

    1. Mesothorium is an outdated term for either Radium226 or Actinium226.

    2. Radium as applied to instruments is most certainly a strong gamma emitter. Gamma radiation is the most penetrating and will not be stopped by a pane of glass or sheetmetal. All radiation detectors are sensitive to gamma, some are somewhat sensitive to beta and may be sensitive to alpha. No alpha will penetrate an instrument case.

    3. The issue is not beta. It is (a) gamma which is hard to shield but decreases markedly with distance and (b) alpha which is safe if sealed but dangerous if inhaled or ingested either as dust or Radon gas.

    see this link for some expert advice http://www.hps.org/publicinformation/ate/q133.html

    in reply to: Aircraft Instrument Panel Projects #1130645
    smirky
    Member

    well done, well past the 50% mark now 🙂

    in reply to: Srange Cannon Shell #1126707
    smirky
    Member

    I think it’s the transit plug fitted before the fuze was fitted in the HE head.

    in reply to: Identifying parts using patent numbers #1093175
    smirky
    Member

    Patent Search

    go to http://gb.espacenet.com and you can do it from your armchair 🙂

    (remember to include the GB prefix to the number)

Viewing 15 posts - 1 through 15 (of 748 total)