Well, BSA and BESA are two different things. If BSA wanted to mark their name they simply used BSA or the piled arms logo. Inspection stamps are usually small and single strike. I have never seen the month and year coding you are suggesting on firearms, doesn’t mean it didn’t happen though!
Come to think of it, the Bren gun parts vocab numbers are often BE and four numbers. Coincidence or not ?
Had a bit more thought on this number and have come to the conclusion that it is a final inspection stamp.
BE is used to donate that it was made by BSA sometimes referred as BESA.
387 either the inspector no or referring that it was made in July 1938.
Need to see other examples such as 39 40 or other to confirm.
That’s four assertions which are unlikely or untrue!
Belfast Anti-ice Panel
http://www.ebay.co.uk/itm/221959488064
Still no bids!
(christmas present scarce man cave battle of britain spitfire XH558 cool rare lancaster piece of history):rolleyes:
Richard, it appears to be an imprint of a hammer stamp. Probably a partial serial since it would be a bit much to get an inspector to hit it three times. Could you flip your picture over for us as the writing is mirrored at the moment?
Yes! Picture 3 is the “piled arms” logo of the BSA company.
I am not concerned personally about AK47’s etc, but the dug up remains of say a Browning or a Hispano, just are not comparable and their destruction will not make a jot of difference to affect the activities of Terrorists
JC, you seem to be attempting to draw a distinction between the AK47 and the dug up Browning. Clearly in the live state the AK47 is more of a potential terrorist threat, however when both are deactivated the sitiuation is reversed in that one could be clubbed to death more readily with the Browning.
In my friendly opinion this is doomed to failure – and has failed in the past.
For one thing there are very few collectors of deactivated Brownings and many collectors of deactivated AK47s and for another thing the government and the likes of our friend trackduster do not make the distinction if indeed there is any.
– even if the Vickers Ks would have been just external replicas.
As a private individual in the UK you have already lost that freedom under the Violent Crime reduction Act 2006.
Nimrod Panel and overhead – fire damaged
http://www.ebay.co.uk/itm/221953778088
http://www.ebay.co.uk/itm/221951538573
Picture as promised of the panel in situ, please PM me an email address if you would like a higher resolution file. 🙂
Really nice to see, thanks. 😀 PM sent.
Emphasis added.
just stick a very non-functional (either machined or even 3D printed) look alike in its place.
Aha but watch out for Blair’s so-called Violent Crime Reduction Act :rolleyes: unless you are happy to compromise even further and paint it bright blue
cool, look forward to seeing it
smirky, I’ve had a quick look at my photos of the Argosy procedures trainer at NAM, but I cannot spot the panel. Would it help if I tried to get some fresh photos at the weekend?
Yes I couldn’t see it either, guess it must be either forward or aft of the engineers panel. A happy snap would be interesting but I don’t want to put you to any trouble as I only got it to use the lamps for my Wessex panel. However I always like to know what things are (might be rare!) and I enjoy these threads and hope everyone else does too.
(It is pretty unlikely but you are welcome to any remaining bits that would improve your museum example.)
I’ve been asked by the Curator at Newark Air Museum to pass on the following message re the panel …. “…it is definitely from an Argosy. Right hand side near the engineers panel.” 🙂
Thanks Twino & thanks to the curator.
Also thanks to everyone else on the forum who has spent time thinking about this!
Eureka!
http://www.airliners.net/photo/Armstrong-Whitworth-AW-660/0847864/L/
I am thinking Argosy as this one has the same knobs on the overhead in a slightly different arrangement.
You want this website!