dark light

smirky

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 256 through 270 (of 748 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: Aircraft Panel I.D. Please #907057
    smirky
    Member

    That’s really great thanks to all, there is a survivor in Australia so I may email them for a close up picture, unless there are anymore cockpits around?

    Heh that’s a thought, you may have the best-preserved one in Europe!

    Unless anyone knows different ………

    in reply to: Aircraft Panel I.D. Please #907839
    smirky
    Member
    in reply to: Aircraft Panel I.D. Please #908164
    smirky
    Member

    I’m sure that’s what it is:D:cool:

    Also has the distinctive stepped cutout at the top right for the control column lock thingy and the bottom slope to clear the control linkage, plus the double staggered row of dimmers. There were a lot of different types of Bristol Freighter and a lot of different customers so it is not surprising that the instrument fit is not exactly as the available photographs.

    http://www.airliners.net/photo/Pacific-Western-Airlines/Bristol-170-Freighter/1965578/L/&sid=cec2c27b35e77064eacea7f54dec7736

    in reply to: Aircraft Panel I.D. Please #909040
    smirky
    Member

    I found this one

    http://1.bp.blogspot.com/-q_3MvvLwD_Y/UdxHbxTCnjI/AAAAAAAAELY/g8vRKNOg9pY/s640/3+-Viking+cockpit.jpg

    but having looked at it the legends are the wrong way up for an overhead – it looks more like a side panel.

    Bristol Freighter cockpit port side!

    https://www.flickr.com/photos/dafydd359/2714963051/in/photostream/

    in reply to: Aircraft Panel I.D. Please #909340
    smirky
    Member

    I was thinking twin engine because of the pressure head heat No 1 & No 2 , but maybe that’s not right ?

    I think it refers to the pitot tubes, there is a windscreen wiper switch though which should narrow things down a bit.

    in reply to: Aircraft Panel I.D. Please #909729
    smirky
    Member

    It looks deffo 50s. I don’t think it is Avro or York, I was thinking Beverley but can’t match anything up.

    Why does it have to be two engine?

    in reply to: Lutterworth E28/39 replica/statue 'at risk' #913591
    smirky
    Member

    “The work is mostly repainting, but due to changes in health and safety requirements and traffic management issues, the costs have spiralled, he said.”

    so it’s ‘elf an safety again, plus paying people to sleep in vans with flashing lights on (or Traffic Management as it is now known)

    in reply to: Old aircraft instruments #914910
    smirky
    Member

    Willie, Some of this is right but some of it is a little misleading. There is plenty of reliable information available online about this. The paint contains Radium 226.

    The radium paint can break down

    YES it can and does and in fact the lightyupness only lasted three or so years for this reason despite the Ra having a half-life of 1600 years

    and emit higher levels of radiation over time.

    NO this is untrue, it does become more hazardous because it disintegrates into powder

    If the gauge is well sealed, with good glass and seals, it might not emit much at all outside the gauge.

    NO this is untrue, Ra is quite a cheeky gamma emitter in any case. Good glass and seals are important though for the reasons below. (Never suck or blow into the dials to try them out!)

    The most danger is when people dismantle them for cleaning etc.. In that situation, the broken down paint is in the form of a fine dust and can come into direct skin contact, or be inhaled.

    YES SPOT ON Ra is also an alpha emitter and is particularly dangerous if ingested

    in reply to: Old aircraft instruments #915944
    smirky
    Member

    None of them looks type-specific so they were used on various aircraft. If you are lucky the aircraft number is sometimes written on the back.
    The date is often stamped on the dial as well.
    1. American wartime
    2. 1940’s/1950’s
    3. wartime, e.g. Spitfire, Lancaster etc.
    4. 1950’s/1960’s
    5. wartime, maybe Spitfire
    6. 1950’s, e.g.Vulcan B1

    1 & 3 look like Radium paint.

    in reply to: Seen On Ebay (2015) #845643
    smirky
    Member

    Look at these then. Am I missing something?

    If you are then I’m missing it too!

    smirky
    Member

    164.5mm, 96.3mm, 49.4mm

    in reply to: Horespower, thrust, clydesdales and making babies. #847888
    smirky
    Member

    Then explain why for autos Torque is a better measure of acceleration / speed than HP?

    Torque is good but I can’t because it is not really true.

    If you look at the power/torque curves for your engine you will see that the power equals the torque times the rpm.
    To put it another way, the torque is equal to the slope of the power curve.
    So if you have lots of torque you will get lots of power. If you have lots of torque at lots of rpm you will get loads of power!

    Diesel is preferred for trucks because of high torque.

    High torque but over a limited rpm range, hence trucks have loads of gears to keep the engine rpm within the power band.
    (The torque is the power divided by the rpm so high torgue at low rpm gives good power at low rpm.)

    And I realize there is ways to convert the values.

    It is not a conversion as such, it is two sides of the same coin since one is equal to the slope of the other.

    Hope this is helpful 🙂

    in reply to: Helicoper Wessex Mk1 Parts Book – has anyone got one? #848118
    smirky
    Member

    Thanks to everyone who suggested bolts, but I was really hoping for one of these …

    [ATTACH=CONFIG]241349[/ATTACH]

    in reply to: Aircraft Cockpit Sections/Instrument Panel Projects Part 2 #848126
    smirky
    Member

    Hercules C-130K Panel

    might have trouble completing this one 🙂

    Does anyone know about the TV in the bottom right – is is for air-air refuelling? Some have it and some don’t.
    [ Ignore that -turns out it’s the weather channel ]

    in reply to: Mystery Lancaster navigation equipment #848243
    smirky
    Member
Viewing 15 posts - 256 through 270 (of 748 total)