“a valuable piece of aviation history”
http://cgi.ebay.co.uk/ws/eBayISAPI.dll?ViewItem&item=120395406445
the bfp has no mounting holes 😀
A couple more clues ….
It seems to have been templated off a standard RAF type panel like the one below but not modified from one since there are holes filled-in as well as created.
It is probably not Norwegian (Upp not Opp).
I can’t be sure of the markings on the ASI – does the needle go round twice or only once? Anyway the max speed will give an indication of what kind of aircraft it came off.
5C/543 – different sizes
Does anyone know why there are two different types with different sized panel cutouts. The left hand one looks older to me and is also about 0.35″ shorter behind the panel.
I know alot of these were front-mounted but did flush-mounted aircraft panels require filing out in order to replace the “old” switches with “new” ones when they wore out?? – the nominal cutout is .030″ taller and about .070″ narrower.
Just wondered as it seems to make a nonsense of the standard.
Hmm. 5c/366 certainly there is an earlier brass type and a later bakelite type.
Cockpit Lamp mkII, don’t know about type B though.
a photo might help 🙂
Thanks Bruce, good to know about the Tufnol, I couldn’t find any in black.
Any chance of a picture (of the panel I mean although you are welcome to pose with it :rolleyes:)
Peter, yes I thought long and hard about that one.
My Avro drawings have the material stated as above but I get the impression from web pictures that the Canadian MkX ones are metal as you can see the paint coming off, the Norman Groom replica also appears to be thin metal. The MkVII NX622 seems to be made out some thick brown stuff as can be seen at the edge of the Pilot’s compass switch.
http://us.airliners.net/photo/Avro-683-Lancaster/1259197/L/
One thing I soon realized comparing all the pictures I could find on the web and in books is that they all seem to be different!
Perhaps I have got it wrong here:eek: -more information anyone?
no, not that, would have 4 holes not 3
Looks nice 🙂
Was that done using hand tools? How thick is the material?
Hi Peter, yes it’s not quite right.
The drawing says “MATERIAL LAMINATED SYNTHETIC SHEET – BLACK
SPEC BSS668 (the numbers are hard to read). I believe it should be 3/16″ thick.
I was going to use 5mm Whale grade Tufnol, but I ended up choosing a cheaper grade called 1P/13, this doesn’t have an obvious fabric weave and so is rather shiny. If I had known this I might have paid a bit more for Whale.
The only material I could get hold of was brown and it should be black so I will be painting it anyway -matt or satin??
Interestingly the panel fits diagonally on a 4ft square Tufnol sheet which I believe is the largest size available – probably always has been.
What does everyone else know on this subject please?
there you go
Red Top Missile Fin
http://cgi.ebay.co.uk/ws/eBayISAPI.dll?ViewItem&ssPageName=STRK:MEWAX:IT&item=110335080824
An impressive and historic item in aid of a good cause – chuffed with mine so order one if you can afford it (and you still have room under the bed)
go for it :diablo:
looks like it really could be “off a Spitfire” then :D:D
Thanks for that Anne, I guess the Gladiator theory is dead.
Can anyone suggest an application for the rpm gauge then? – I was thinking Bristol Mercury …
Thanks for concern about the dial Anon. This is why I put a replacement glass on it in the first place – the thing is as radioactive as Chenobyl’s door knob 😮