.. please, explain…
.. does this alone say everything? what about the overall technological basis of Swedes or Yanks which is definitely a whole lot better than the one of India?
According to this logic, FC-1 should perform better than F-16E…
the super hornet is basically an f-18 which flew many years back.the LCA on the other hand is spanking new with high tech composite costruction a tailless delta configuration for increase unstability. it has a modern glass cockpit which someone just posted..i havent seen such an advanced cockpit before. it is full of display screens and all the functions are performed by the computer which is good. the software has been created by the best software engineers in the world.and the radar is modern unlike the apg-73 which is quite old. the Isreilis have helped in getting the pods and other avionics subsystems for the Tejas. the Nlca will incorporate the lessons learned from the LCA therefore will be even better. it should be able to outdo the super hornet i most of the cases while being inefrior to the f-14 (although the f-14 would be getting a pension by then) and more practical for india then the su-27K.the rafale should be superior but with certain upgrades the Nlca should be able to match the rafale over the years.although it dosnt seem to be that cost expensive but that is because things in india are a lot cheeper then the ROW. i am really looking forward to seeing the LCA replace the mig-21’s at my home town ambala. it would be an awsome fighter aircraft. definately worth the wait
Sign In
