dark light

Stoeng

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 9 posts - 1 through 9 (of 9 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: Polish President's Plane Crashes In Russia #569317
    Stoeng
    Participant

    Time is probably up for plenty of rumors in the days and weeks to come, but I suppose that we just have to wait and se what the CVR will say about this subject.

    I read in a Norwegian newspaper that President Kaczynski called a pilot that refused to land in difficult weather in Tbilisi sometimes in 2008 a coward and had him removed after their return to Poland.

    However if it is true I have unfortunately know knowledge about.

    in reply to: Polish President's Plane Crashes In Russia #569534
    Stoeng
    Participant

    Indeed a sad story (once more) for the Polish nation.

    Without ILS it would mean a VOR or NDB letdown, and with fog and 500m visibility it is below anybody’s minima. This guy tried several times before disaster.

    One can only imagine what pressure the pilot must have had on his shoulders.
    With the President and the Chief of Staff in the back going to an extremely important ceremony, with another plane loaded with journalist landing safely 40 min earlier (as if just to prove that the weather is OK) these guys just had the worst situation imaginable with a perfectly working aircraft.

    Investigations will show what really happen, but I am afraid that this will in the decades to come be a school example of human factor errors and what to not do.

    Does anybody know if there was a PAR service in use for this approach?

    in reply to: Iran plane fire kills 16 #526244
    Stoeng
    Participant

    The Valuejet crash wasn’t caused by parts…good or bad.
    A contracted maintenance outfit (IIRC) put overhauled…or in need of overhaul…emergency oxygen generating cylinders on board as cargo. One ignited causing a fire.

    Yes you are certainly right, and maybe I was mixing things together with another company.
    However I can remember a story about a DC9 having an engine exploding on takeoff. I think it was Valujet flight 597 on the 08 June 1995.
    The engine had a doubtful origin (in the middle-east somewhere), where major maintenance had been badly made and wrong parts fitted together with large cracks not discovered.

    in reply to: Iran plane fire kills 16 #526419
    Stoeng
    Participant

    So your saying that theres no “fake” Airbus or Boeing parts out on the market????

    Your basically saying in your post that because its Russian and in Iran, its no doubt got “dodgy” parts. Hence that when a “western” airliner crashes there has never been found a fake part or the investigators never check parts or serial numbers?!

    Oh please….

    With all due respects sir, I don’t think he was saying that.

    Parts problems exists all over the world, and I think that every major aviation nation had (and maybe will have) some problems in this regards.
    I can recall a company in the US called Valuejet (or something like that) that had big (and fatal) troubles with this.

    However it is a fact that we have today a serious aviation safety issue in Iran. There is no need for a PHD in statistics to establish that. It is also a fact that most of the incidents are happening with Russian built aircraft.
    This is probably due to poor maintenance (corruption and maintenance “short-cuts”) and crew training that is of an unknown quality.

    I have no doubts about that a well maintained TU154, or IL62 for that sake, is just as safe as a similar aircraft made in the US, but once flown in countries where maintenance and crew training is not the same as we can find in some large industrialized countries, well… we have exactly what we see in Iran today.

    in reply to: Iran plane fire kills 16 #527036
    Stoeng
    Participant

    Yes I completely agree with you.

    Not wanting to turn this tread away from the IL62 accident in Mashad, but you have a very interesting point about the TU154.

    I personally think that the TU154 is a quite good aircraft, maybe not as economical, efficient, and comfortable as many other newer and more modern aircraft, but still OK when everything is working.

    It seems like the Caspian Airlines TU154 suffered a catastrophic failure of the nr2 (tail) engine and this might have caused a rupture of the hydraulic lines controlling rudder and elevator. Then it is only one way to go, strait down.

    I am not at all a specialist on the TU154 and maybe somebody else knows better. Also I do not know if the controls can be controlled electrically (like in some aircraft) via the autopilot controls.

    in reply to: Iranian Airliner Down #527053
    Stoeng
    Participant

    The US blocked the sale of Fokker F-100s some years back on the account of US made parts in the engines.

    That is possible.

    However there are now plenty of F100 flying (happily) in the skies of Iran.:)

    in reply to: Iran plane fire kills 16 #527188
    Stoeng
    Participant

    Yepp… sometimes I wonder how one could feel safe on a plane in Iran.

    However Iran Air is not so bad and seems to be more or less up to international standards.

    On the other hand; the numerous “low cost” airlines in Iran are really a nightmare.

    Dogdy “wet leases”, in this case (if I got the details right), a Kazak aircraft and crew.
    I know nothing about Kazak maintenance and crew training levels, but please allow me to be reticent.
    There is currently a rumor (only a rumor) in Iran that the damaged aircraft is not the aircraft it is supposed to be.
    In other words, the serial number does not correspond to the registration number, and it looks like the serial number on the aircraft belongs to another airframe that supposedly should have been scrapped in Kazakhstan.
    Now it is only a rumor and we have to wait and see.

    Anyway corruption in Iran is at such a level that on a maintenance and documentation level anything is possible

    in reply to: Iranian Airliner Down #527190
    Stoeng
    Participant

    One cannot blame sanctions for eventual air disasters.

    Under sanctions or not, if an aircraft is not serviceable… well… it doesn’t take off. End of story.

    in reply to: What Type Of Aircraft Did You First Fly In? #1184124
    Stoeng
    Participant

    PA 18 – 135 (Super Cub) on floats in Nordhordaland Flyklubb sometimes in late 1982.

Viewing 9 posts - 1 through 9 (of 9 total)