dark light

Chicoartist

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 8 posts - 16 through 23 (of 23 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: "Twin-tailed Dragons" pencil sketch (P-38s) #1322234
    Chicoartist
    Participant

    Avery atmospheric and emotive sketch! I like it a lot… 😉 Do you do commission’s?

    Thx for the good words … much appreciated.

    The way I’ve been working is to “advertise” on my site and my email list what my desired (by me – subjects that I’d like to do) upcoming projects are, and I’ve been pretty lucky in that I have pretty mainstream tastes in subject matter and I’ve had ‘takers’ for almost everything, and now am backlogged well over a year.

    I certainly will entertain suggestions, however … 😎

    Wade

    in reply to: Oil study finished for "The Debden Kidd" … #1333970
    Chicoartist
    Participant

    Great idea. I’ll try that.

    I actually have several “dust pattern” photos I know of that I’ll dig up for general reference (which probably show the effect exactly as you describe), but I didn’t consult them (recently).

    Wade

    in reply to: Oil study finished for "The Debden Kidd" … #1334006
    Chicoartist
    Participant

    Very nice Wade!
    Try put in a bit more of a hint of motion though. They’re buzzing past the viewer at considerable speed I assume.

    Ronnie,

    Yes – I’m not quite finished with it yet – feedback I’m getting is “universally” positive overall, but universally “hmmmm” when it comes to the motion aspect. Sooooo, after a suggestion on another site, I’m going to put some kicked up dust behind the planes.

    I went into PhotoShop to ‘experiment’ with the effect … and I really like it!

    This is the quick PhotoShopped “dust” version – this is the basic “look” I’m after:

    http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v76/Chicoartist/Debden_Kidd_oilstudy_dust.jpg

    This is how the actual painting looks today (also seen at the top of this thread … some dust applied behind the wheels) – I will let it dry a bit more, then get a little bit more definition in there to match (more or less) the PhotoShop version above:

    http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v76/Chicoartist/Debden_Kidd_oilstudy_complete_dust.jpg

    Tell you what – my next piece will be airborne P-38s … can’t wait to get back in the clouds! But I did learn a lot with this piece for sure! 😮

    Wade

    in reply to: Progress on 'The Debden Kidd' oil study … #1337336
    Chicoartist
    Participant

    Almost forgot … yes, I will probably publish the final canvas as a very limited edition (100 prints total) giclee with a pencil remarque option. Once I finish this study, I’ll start taking print pre-orders with a small discount.

    Thx!
    Wade

    in reply to: Progress on 'The Debden Kidd' oil study … #1337344
    Chicoartist
    Participant

    . . . I notice an Elm tree (God rest ’em) on the skyline behind what I presume must be Abbots – captured a balmy Essex day well.

    Very sharp eye! It was through Robert Taylor’s books that I learned that the Elm was “no more” due to disease (IIRC). Too bad, it was always in ground-based photos and simply must be included in any scene like this. I used a composite of actual photos to get the background trees and buildings.

    Glad you guys like the atmosphere … that’s your sky up there! Skies have always been my weak point … but I’m learning.

    Yes, Hofer is long overdue for “more” recognition. I heard some interesting stories about him over a couple of 4th FG reunions … like the time he came back from a mission and went to eat a meal in the Officer’s Mess with his flying clothes still on. The ground exec, universally hated by the pilots for his petty “rules”, threw him out of the mess for not having his Class A’s on for dining. Hofer went to his room and got his .45 and threatened to “. . . shoot the SOB!” … and might well have done so if not physically restrained.

    Hofer was, in the end, a very troubled young man, with problems back home that are only now coming to light (my friend Troy White’s excellent book highlights some of these) … another friend of mine who specializes in Hofer is of the opinion that Hofer simply “didn’t care” about his personal safety and as a result threw himself into combat with abandon. That, plus his natural skill, along with a little luck common to anyone who engaged in combat, made him quite successful – and very worthy of recognition on canvas and print. Contact Troy through his website to inquire about his book:
    http://starduststudios.com/

    I had never done anything myself prior to taking on this project, and by the time it’s over I’ll have three Hofer paintings finished – and I have an idea for another, which I hope to get to before too long:

    1. The Debden Kidd (above)

    2. Duke and The Kidd:

    http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v76/Chicoartist/duke_and_the_kidd_large_8.jpg

    3. Morning Mission:

    http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v76/Chicoartist/morning_mission_final_tweak_web_998.jpg

    Cheers!

    Wade

    in reply to: Progress on 'The Debden Kidd' oil study … #1337538
    Chicoartist
    Participant

    Interesting composition to have the subjects flying ‘out’ of the picture, quite unusual really.

    Thx … not that I strive for the unusual 🙂 , but rather this is a scene I would have loved to witness, and decided to commit to canvas. This *is* a dangerous composition – art teachers worldwide may go into shock at some of the compositional elements, but I still like it.

    I know you have not exactly invited comment, but seeing as you have posted it I will just mention that I think the subjects would be largely silhouetted, as the primanry light source (sun) seems to be just above the hut

    Duly noted, and appreciated. If this were a photograph I took, the subjects would be almost “black” in silhouette (you’re right in that regard). However, the eye is infinitely more capable than the camera lens, and isn’t as easily confused by backlighting. For that reason, photographers avoid backlighting in general, and artists (like Keith Ferris, for example) relish it because it allows us to throw all those wonderful atmospheric colors in the (larger) shadowed areas.

    . . . at least if you project the shadow angles on the UC legs, they loosely converge there.

    The gear “leg” shadows converge at the horizon directly underneath the sun (or close as I could get with my loose brushwork!). You can’t continue the gear leg cast shadow line to the sun itself. Why? Since the object (the gear legs/the planes/etc.) are planted on the ground, the ground comes into play and “intercepts” the falling [cast] shadow and bends it upwards. This phenomenon can be observed by the cast shadow of a very tall tower next to mountains … the cast shadow of the tower will go down and up and up and down on the undulating terrain depending on the height of the ground “intercepting” it as it “falls”.

    This is different than if a baseball, for example, were suspended magically 10 feet in the air … in that case you could draw a line from the shadow through the baseball and to the sun.

    Wade

    in reply to: Pencil study for 'The Debden Kidd' #1365036
    Chicoartist
    Participant

    Will there be any limited edition prints available from the original?

    Thanks, and yes, I will probably publish this one as a limited edition giclee. I’ll be accepting pre-orders (at a discount) when the 1/2 scale oil study is finished.

    Wade

    in reply to: Oh … hi guys! #1340612
    Chicoartist
    Participant

    Selecting subjects …

    How do you select your subjects? Suggestion? whim,? commission?

    Generally, I prefer to decide on a subject or two that really interests me, then start researching the background info. About this time, I’ll let my ’email army’ know what my plans are. A good number of folks on my email list are serious collectors, so what happens is the inevitable back and forth on price with one or two people, and I come to an understanding with one … so, so far, just about everything I’ve done has been sold before I finish it. I’ve tried to do commissions out of the blue, that is, subjects I’m not particularly passionate about, and I don’t like it … it then becomes “work”, and there’s lots easier (and quicker) ways to make money! Luckily, I have mainstream tastes, and I like the popular subjects (it would seem).

    At the present time, I have four commission works in line which I accepted because I wanted to do them anyway, and somebody stepped up to the plate with a deposit … “Mustangs at Dawn” (P-51s), then another piece featuring Kidd Hofer’s 4th FG B-model, a P-38 piece, then finally an F-100D scene from Vietnam. After that, I’m hoping to do a B-17 scene that I’ve been wanting to do for quite a while.

    In between those major works, which may take 2-3 months each from scratch, I will probably do more little oils like the one above. It’s an exercise I like to do every once in a while … find a nice wartime black and white picture, and ‘colorize’ it my way, in paint. As much as I want to simply frame them and hang them up in the house, there’s always somebody who talks me out of them … ‘course, the wife says that’s the goal … :confused: I’m an artist, not a businessman!

    Thx for the nice comments!

    Wade

Viewing 8 posts - 16 through 23 (of 23 total)