Superb picture, thanks for posting it.
Interesting thread. My maternal grandfather worked for Esso at Heathrow as a driver/refueller for > 25 years, retiring in 1988. I imagine he drove these but unfortunately as he has now passed on I cannot ask. I will see if they ring a bell with anyone else in the family.
By the end of his career the large tankers like these were long gone and replaced by small “hydrocarts” (I think that was the term) which pump fuel from under the apron up to the wing, rather than carrying it with them.
Without wishing to appear to join any bashing of my adopted country, it does seem that Australians do not have such a refined or developed sense of history, nor do they seem to miss it in the way that Americans love to travel to Europe to see old buildings etc.
Perhaps it is the fact that the lifestyle is more outdoor orientated here in Australia, with people being enthusiastic boaties, fishermen, 4WD, team sports players etc.?
Interesting question and something I had noticed myself since being here.
I have not been to Booker for many years but I believe there used to be a small museum including a Percival Provost among other things. Is it still there>
I would also add (as is often the case) that what you see and the perception of what you see in documentaries is not always the real picture by virtue of how a film is cut or edited. That is not an attempt at obfuscation or “defence” (if any were needed) in respect of this 1970s film but an honest appraisal of how these things often work. What you saw, or thought you saw, in that film was not neccesarily how it was. On the other hand, it was best that other things were not seen, probably. Can’t be more honest than that!
I think that is a key point that we should remember, journalism in all its forms rarely presents the unedited. Your contribution to this discussion is certainly honest and interesting.
Maybe we have all grown up a little since those days. As for human remains, it is a phenomenon how much more sensitive we have all become in 30 years – I’m sure any old aviation archaeologists of that period will recall practices and occurrences that would read very badly today.
I would second that observation because I was in some way quite uncomfortable with the film, despite the historical interest. I think perhaps because it was implied that they half knew the pilot was still with the aircraft and it was therefore a war-grave but were going at it with a JCB which stood every chance of hacking off part of the skeleton. Also, the fact that the group removed the remains into bags and onto their truck themselves rather than backing off and allowing the authorities to proceed.
I realise this sounds critical, but I do not mean it thus given that perceptions and opinions are clearly different 30 years later.
Funny this thread should have come up. I was recently motivated to look into a project I recalled from my primary schooling, the BBC Domesday project which was, I suppose, a forerunner of Google maps plus wikipedia in that ordinary folk contributed. It was to mark 900 years since William the Conqueror’s original book. Interestingly, anyone with a working knowledge of Latin can go to Kew and read the original nine-hundred years later. The digital edition was/is on the verge of obsolescence already as nobody uses the files or the video discs anymore. I believe work is ongoing to save it.
It certainly makes one think.
Fascinating clip. Thanks for sharing.
Ouch. Gruesome picture. What a shame.
There was an official book called, I believe, “Thunder and Lightining – the RAF in the Gulf”. I seem to remember it being good but cannot find my copy currently.
Edit: here is a link: