Nice wide angle HUD,has it already been incorporated with the LSPs?

What makes this HUD wide angle? From what I could make out, its FOV is 25 deg while that of the EF2K is 35 deg.

The CG does in fact look really good. But I can’t help but nit pick. On the plan (top down) view, the missile placement does not look symetrical.

Administrators may please note that I’m unable to post replies that have multiples quotes.

Then how am

Hence, I have had to post individual replies per quotation.

I doing this?

Any pics of the hospital ship that just entered PLAN service?

This new missile seems to be similar in dims to Brahmos, which would have implications on IN ship capability. Also, a land based TEL might be able to carry multiple missiles (like the Brahmos TEL) versus carrying only one Agni I or Prithvi per TEL.

Those inboard elevators being able to carry only one aircraft at a time will be a major liability against sortie rates.

I was wondering if Russia can co-operate with India in the development of AESA type radar , both for ABM system and Naval systems.

India has experience in developing AESA radars and the first ABM radar LRTR which is better in many aspect to GreenPine ( range , number of targets its can track and can track higher velocity targets ) can co-develop it with Russia.

Similarly the Elta 2248 AESA Radar /Barak-8 system which will arm frigates starting with P-17A will help russia quicken the development period.

So far the TOT has mostly been one sided , now the reverse may work as well.

The LRTR and the Barak-8 are more of codevelopments and not just straight TOT. Therefore, the Israeli side probably has a say in where the technology ends up. Similiar to how the Russian side has a say in where Brahmos tech and systems can end up.