This looks like something Ming the Merciless flew around in. I still find this neat looking and has a pretty cool name too 😉


A vast number of private technology services companies in India would not be where they are without the Tejas, Dhruv and various other DRDO, ISRO and CSIR projects.
What about the IR sats monitoring for BM launches?
For all we know they already evaluated the above option and rejected it. The article does mention explicitly that Embraer has been working on it for the past 3 years, and from the Indian side, it would have been NAL and ADA for the aero config. with CABs as the coordinator.
The DRDO Mag article on the AEW&C shown at the Singapore air show, also contains the same picture you posted first with the single piece support for the AEW&C.
The structural tests on the AAAU using both the single and dual pylon options are yet to be done. Both options appear to be acceptable from an aero POV but structural validation needs to be done to select the overall better option.
Probably known to most but I recently learned that LRDE is working on developing a small (<15kg) SAR payload for UAV applications.
And now some news:
FARNBOROUGH 2008: India’s HCL joins EADS top team
Indian engineering services provider HCL Technologies is here to trumpet credentials established by its recent selection as a Tier 1 supplier by European aerospace conglomerate EADS.
On the eve of the show EADS named HCL as one of just 28 preferred suppliers out of an existing pool of more than two thousand.
“This is a further example of the growing strategic relationship between the aerospace industry and India,” says Rajeev Sawhney, the company’s president for Europe. “With the breadth and depth of our aerospace engineering expertise, we have been at the forefront in developing that relationship.”
EADS currently spends about €2 billion a year on engineering services such as research, modelling, flight physics and design. HCL supplies EADS with product engineering and technical publication services via the group’s design centre in Bangalore.
HCL Technologies works from locations in 18 countries and serves a number of sectors besides aerospace, including financial services, retail and consumer, life sciences and healthcare, telecoms, and media and entertainment.
The one-piece mount is probably the final design as the ground stress tests of the AAAU structure will be with that mount.
Added later: The structural tests will be done in two configurations, the single pylon that is depicted earlier and a double pylon.
Dual pylon config:

It’s interesting to note that ADA/IAF is considering adding more control surfaces, particulary canards for the Blk 2 Tejas.
Don’t get too wrapped around the axel about the mount. It’s something that was tested in Indian wind tunnels and found suitable. It will have to be further tested by Embraer and validated by them. If Embraer green lights the mount design on their bird, that’s the end of discussion.
Looks like there will have to be some major re-engineering done to the air intake for the Blk 2 higher thrust version. Even more re-engineering will have to be done if they decide to add canards. Both of these changes along with the different CoG and weight of the new engine will necessitate revalidation of major portions of the control laws and flight envelope.
I wouldn’t take the projected in-service year of Blk 2 Tejas of 2015-16 at face value. I would add another year or two to that, at least.
Preliminary graphic of the AEW&C.

If you insult another member’s family, you are still personally attacking that member and are not playing by the rules. That should be obvious. Is there something specific that you’re trying to get at here?
So, insulting others is ok so long as the person you’re insulting isn’t on the forum? That is the level of “equity” from the forum rules to be expected? If Bush can be called an idiot for his opinions, forum members are immune from that type of criticism because they’re forum members? And you’re saying that you’re not out to censor opinions?
If insulting someone is to be verboten, why not have that as an across the board policy?
BTW, if I insult a member’s mother, what makes it a personal insult to the member? The familial connection is only incidental, I was criticizing the mother.
Uh, absolutely nothing, unless he is a member of the forum. We’re not censoring opinions, we’re simply enforcing the standards as they are currently written.
So, insulting people are fair game as long as those people are not members of the forum? So are the mothers, fathers, sisters, etc of members also fair game to be insulted? After all, you’re not here to censor all opinions just opinions about AFM Forum members, right?
The rules of the forum stating that it is not alright to personally attack member Y, that’s what!
Valid but ultimately irrelevant point. What prevents member X from calling Bush an idiot?
If forum member X calls George Bush an idiot, what insulates the forum member X from being called an idiot by forum member Y? Once the threshold of insult and/or criticism of a person is crossed, then the person who crossed it is fair game. N’est pas?
I still think that my policy is best. Best to ignore annoying barking dogs but once in a while throw a rock at them to rile them up some more.