dark light

Victor

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 316 through 330 (of 1,377 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: Radar-fitted Tejas this year #2491435
    Victor
    Participant
    in reply to: NGB Ultra Stealth #2493630
    Victor
    Participant
    in reply to: Radar-fitted Tejas this year #2494139
    Victor
    Participant

    it seems like new dumb bomb pylon has been added just after the LDP

    You could do that, just don’t expect to use the MLG 😀

    http://aeroindia.org/files/images/tejas_td1_fl3.jpg

    in reply to: IAF news-discussion October-December 2007 #2495264
    Victor
    Participant
    in reply to: Radar-fitted Tejas this year #2495281
    Victor
    Participant

    I don’t have subcription, here’s a link to the free portion.

    This is about as from the horse’s mouth as possible.

    Ainspiron posted the full article here:
    Clicky

    in reply to: Radar-fitted Tejas this year #2495289
    Victor
    Participant

    Thanks Victor. Can you post the entire article?

    I don’t have subcription, here’s a link to the free portion.

    This is about as from the horse’s mouth as possible.

    in reply to: Radar-fitted Tejas this year #2495332
    Victor
    Participant

    The latest Force mag has the ACM Major stating that

    More specifically, two squadrons of the LCA in the IOC version will be inducted in 2010-11. After that, the IAF plan is to have six LCA squadrons by the end of the 13th Defence Plan.

    It looks like six sqdns by 2018-20 time frame.

    in reply to: Radar-fitted Tejas this year #2497582
    Victor
    Participant

    Regarding the growth in weight, I think it was a misreporting that confused the AUW of 10,000kg with the empty weight of 6,500kg.

    The problem, I believe, is that at lower altitudes in hot conditions, the IN20 and the currently spec’d Kaveri is not enough to push a fully loaded, at 10,000kg, Tejas to operationally required speeds.

    in reply to: Biggin Hill Air Fair – Indian Sarang team!! #2498400
    Victor
    Participant

    Sarang pilots (at ILA 2008)

    http://www.ila-berlin.de/ila2008/presse/galerie2008/view204.jpg

    in reply to: Is It Me ? #2499388
    Victor
    Participant

    if you need that level of “vision” then why use such an indiscriminate weapon.

    What if the target itself is a spread out collection of soft targets like an insurgent training base or an enemy logistics depot or planes out on the tarmac, etc? Also, cluster bombs make great area denial weapons as well because the unexploded bomblets act as little mines and can compel OPFOR to get bogged down either clearing them or going around them. The cluster bomb is still a very effective weapon.

    If the argument that it kills little kids, then a Kalashnikov in a child’s hands is also lethal. Technology can improve the bomblets into being smarter and reduce the dud rate.

    in reply to: Engine for LCA #2499788
    Victor
    Participant

    This change in the ASRs was a good move though. Who can imagine a fighter getting IOC in 2009-10 time frame and not being qual’d to carry the IAF’s main WVR weapon?

    Did the IAF/ADA did not forsee a heavier weight WVR missile coming in the future when the ASRs for that hardpoint were being made?

    I know I am showing my ignorance of Rajkumar’s book.

    in reply to: Engine for LCA #2499804
    Victor
    Participant

    Why would an ordnance switch cause a redesign, supposedly of the wing?

    in reply to: The PAK-FA Saga Episode IV #2499810
    Victor
    Participant

    But that second platform should be the Su-35.

    I will have to disagree. We’ll see where things go I suppose. I know that MiG will try to push the light fighter concept though, hard.

    in reply to: Engine for LCA #2499841
    Victor
    Participant

    Nick,

    Is there any reason to spoon feed good information to trolls who will only come back with more troll worthy posts?

    Treat trolls as the barking dog next door. Do what you got to do but make sure to taunt him once in a while. Sure he’s annoying but that doesn’t mean you can’t throw a rock at him once in a while and get him really riled. Would you throw real food at him and try to get him to like you knowing full well that the dog will never like you?

    BTW, check this out:
    http://www.forumwarz.com
    😀

    I wonder how long it will take the forum poobahs to delete this post… And I didn’t even make references to the color green. Oh wait, dang it…

    in reply to: The PAK-FA Saga Episode IV #2499844
    Victor
    Participant

    His opinion might matter if he wasn’t the HEAD of RAC-MiG! With the apparent abandonment of the MiG-29SMT upgrades and the focus on upgrading Su-27s and buying Su-34s and Su-35s the RusAF has clearly chosen to focus on long-range, heavy fighters. With a mix of 400 Su-35s and PAK-FAs they have no real need for a lighter fighter (yeah I made the number up, but you get the point). I’d like to know just what role the PAK-FA isn’t supposed to be able to perform that RAC-MiG feels justifies the production and procurement of a whole new aircraft? Export is one thing, but he’s talking about domestic use here, which is a whole different issue.

    I would contend that Russia will not go to an all heavy fighter force. If it does, a few years later, it will go to OAK and request a lighter platform, simply because of money. A force as large as the VVS will want two platforms, especially when the second platform’s technology can be leveraged from the first platform.

    I would also contend that the Russians haven’t bought any new MiGs primarily because the new MiGs aren’t worth buying. From the initial Mig-29K to the Mig-35, they’ve all been mostly promises and dead ends. The Russian air force is too smart to buy any of the endless cavalcade of warmed over Mig-29 variants, even if other air forces aren’t. Algeria has wizened up though.

Viewing 15 posts - 316 through 330 (of 1,377 total)