dark light

Victor

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 346 through 360 (of 1,377 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: Project 17A Frigate for India #2078298
    Victor
    Participant

    orko 8 and JonS, yes, those the launchers I was talking about. I figured they were some sort of countermeasure.

    By the looks of the level of countermeasures and RBU-6000 packed into this vessel, the IN intends for this thing to get into knife fights with subs.

    An ASROC type weapon could have been useful in this ship.

    Added later:
    Regarding the Soviet/Russian influence, it was expected as all homemade IN ships have distinctive Russian influence with Indian and Western (French and Israeli) gear mixed in. All in all, I am disappointed as well with the lack of versatility of the design. With the addtion of the helo UAV based on the Alouette III, the ship will be a decent ASW platfor but with no room for growth into anything else.

    in reply to: Project 17A Frigate for India #2078314
    Victor
    Participant

    I see, I will ask Maz at BR. The models you posted have some VLS at the rear just before the Hangar. Any idea what they contain?

    Those are Barak launcers.

    in reply to: Project 17A Frigate for India #2078321
    Victor
    Participant

    orko 8, thanks for posting those pics. I believe those are the first pics of a physical model of the P28 on the net.

    One of my biggest criticism against the P28 is its lack of guided weapons, aside from the Barak.

    What are those launchers adjacent to the main mast?

    in reply to: Coming sooner than one thinks: invisible aircraft #2464327
    Victor
    Participant

    The real holy grail of visual stealth could be a combination of electroluminescence and chromatophoric technology. 🙂

    A good point was raised about the electroluminescence cladding being RAM compatible. I don’t think any airforce will sacrifice radar stealth for visual stealth.

    in reply to: The PAK-FA Saga Episode III #2467512
    Victor
    Participant

    It’s very hard to see where HAL and India can have any say into the design of the plane if first flight is next year and IOC mid to late next decade.

    At this point in time, I’m inclined to believe that the extent of HAL’s input will be in IAF specific avionics and as a production sharing partner.

    in reply to: Project 17A Frigate for India #2078648
    Victor
    Participant

    Although the P17s will have a good weapon complement of around 30+ Shtil, 16 Barak-1, 8 3M-14E missiles, A244S torops, RBU-6000, and 76mm SRGM and two Kashtans. The fact that a ship coming out in 2009 with an arm launched SAM is a bit disappointing.
    I guess, the AD layers of the P17s will be 0-5km covered by Kashtans, 5-15km covered by Barak, 15-30km covered by Shtils.

    The ship will also have six illuminators as opposed to the four, previously believed. What I am not sure about is if these six illuminators is a four Orech plus two STGR configuration or six Orechs plus two STGRs.

    Having the ability to carry two 10-ton ASW helos also makes this ship hit above her weight class. IMO, this ship class is a mixed bag. It has good capability but the age of some of its systems is worrisome. Particularly the Fregat, RAWL-04, Orech and Shtil. One would have thought that a ship that will be joining the fleet in 2009 will have some more contemporary systems.

    in reply to: IAF news-discussion October-December 2007 #2467624
    Victor
    Participant
    in reply to: Drone shot down over Georgia #2468162
    Victor
    Participant

    Yes, I agree about the launch from wingtip. I think that the coastal footage from the UAV are real, but i have serious doubts about the “plane” and the hit. Very powerful “record unit” by the way… Survived the impact, the explosion …the fall to the sea… and the inmersion in the water?…

    Is just my opinion of course…

    The footage was being transmitted real time to the ground control station.

    in reply to: Indian navy – news & discussion #2079047
    Victor
    Participant
    in reply to: What Orion type? #2470410
    Victor
    Participant

    Could it be some sort of a testbed for the RTIP and/or the BAMS competition?

    in reply to: INS Vikramaditya delayed until 2011! #2079069
    Victor
    Participant

    What radars will the Vikramaditya get?

    in reply to: INS Vikramaditya delayed until 2011! #2079144
    Victor
    Participant

    A couple of “new” pics of the Vikramaditya models

    http://pilot.strizhi.info/wp-content/uploads/2008/04/p1000410_sm.jpg
    http://pilot.strizhi.info/wp-content/uploads/2008/04/p1000411_sm.jpg

    More Russian naval pics here

    in reply to: What are those on Tejas? #2472148
    Victor
    Participant

    Correct me if I’m wrong but usually major avionics eqpt isn’t usually located that far aft and right right next to the primary heat source. The vast majority of the avionics is located under and behind the cockpit. Of course the ram air could be fed forward via ducting. This pic does in fact show some sort of pipe/duct that goes from aft of the cockpit to that inlet area. My guess would be that the dorsal inlet is for the new O2 generation system.

    Although, the APU theory may have some traction because in this pic, notice that there seems to be an exhaust port just aft of the inlet.

    in reply to: Indian MMRCA saga – Jan 08 #2473893
    Victor
    Participant

    Hence from the above, the Tejas is equivalent to the Rafale in terms of technology, and will be superior if AESA radar is installed on the same.

    I’d hold off on claims like these till the bird flies in FOC configuration. The Tejas has high ambitions and is spec’d out in a manner that takes into account its time of entry. But comparing it to a plane that is seeing combat sorties now, is very premature.

    If any one thing that has the potential to kill this program is its engine development. By all accounts, the ball has been dropped in this aspect of the program and is a giant target for those who want this program closed. In every other aspect, the program has made acceptable progress.

    in reply to: General Discussion #342530
    Victor
    Participant

    China has the right to handle its internal affairs as it sees fit. Just like the USA did in the 1700 and 1800s, or did the native Americans all of a sudden move somewhere else?

    So, what was good in the 18th and 19th century is good in the 21st? Why worry about collateral damage then? GBU-10s for everyone then?

Viewing 15 posts - 346 through 360 (of 1,377 total)