Mig-35 over F-35?
In 10 years time, there will be 100+ F-35s. Mig-35 on the other hand might only be seen in a museum.
Wouldn’t the location of the fight be a big factor?
If it was happening right off of Russia’s coast, it’d be one thing but if it was happening in the middle of the Pacific, the outcome would probably be different.
It’s not the South Asian region that’s the epicenter of Islamist fascism, nor the Islamist terror export capital of the world or even the worst nuclear proliferator. It’s pakistan and Pakistan alone that is all those things. Don’t drag the region into the hole that Pakistan has descended into.
The most important skill for Indians to exercise is to build a good wall between India and Pakistan.
Frankly, don’t Pakistanis currently have enough problems at home to occupy their minds than Indian problems? I suggest, Pakistanis use their time and effort to solve their country’s glaring problems at home before calling the kettle black and offering advice to others.
qsaark, please look up the meaning of the word “junta” for self edification. Thanks.
As i always said, the LCA is proportionally too short
What makes one so sure that analysis of alternatives have not been done? Notice something familiar?
The learning curve is steep as India is trying to leap frog its aero industry by a large margin in trying to develop this plane so delays are natural. Also, skeptcism about India’s aero industry is justified because it doesn’t have what the Saabs and the LMs of this world have: A successful track record spanning decades in developing fighters.
But in order for India’s aero industry to get to the next level, this plane has to be developed, even if the road is tortuously slow.
Personally, I don’t see the project as viable anymore?
What platform would you suggest that can replace the hundreds of Mig-21s in IAF service at a reasonable cost while benefiting the aero industry?
its inlet design is horrible.
You can blame Dassault for that. I believe it was the early consultant in that aspect of the design.
may be sufficient to atleast suggest that the Tejas overall is a superior design to the Gripen.
It may not be wise to compare X with Y when Y has been in service for almost a decade and has multiple export orders and is considered one of the best aircraft of its time. While X is still under development and full commitment by the main customer is still not there.
It’s almost as asinine as saying that PAK-FA will be better than the F-22. Sorry, F/A-22 😀
I can see the Indian crowd gets a little touchie when someone is critical of one of their indigineous designs.
Only when people make comments like this…
Just looking at how the air will flow across the plane’s shape in the line art leads me to suspect that supersonic drag is more of a problem than raw power of the engine.
Who needs wind tunnels, expensive CFD codes and super computers to do aero design, when one can just look at line drawings? Someone tell the Indian design agencies they wasted their money on all that stuff when all they needed was line drawings.
BTW, I would suspect that an engine gets even more derated due to the temps and humidity levels at sea level around India. That might necessitate a more powerful engine than planes that reside in colder climes.
I believe in the recent video on Scorpene construction in Mumbai, a P-17 was shown for cpl of seconds. The superstructure appeared almost finished.
Added later,
you can see the video here. Shivalik can be seen at 25 sec.
If you look closely at the mast, there’re no radars or other antennae to be seen. That is probably hull P19 and hopefully not P17. If it’s P17, then its induction is a ways off, not to mention the rest of the class.
Yet, the forward part of the ships is not going to be enlarged to extent the hanger pass its original size. Which, does limit the space available. Especially, for a Carrier of her size. So, like most conversion its a compromise……:(
Don’t forget about the elevators. They aren’t big enough to transport more than one a/c at a time. Also, the elevator that’s inboard of the island is at an incredibly inconvenient spot for STOBAR ops. The elevator layout was designed for STOVL and helo ops at a much lower OPTEMPO than what a STOBAR carrier of this size is expected to accomplish.
Then you compound that issue with suboptimal hangar size and the typical maintenance hoggishness of Russian naval equipment especially the boilers and its associated machinery…
The IN is going to have its hands full. I feel sorry for anyone who’ll be the chang on that ship.
Does anybody have a reasonable explanation for the lack of imagery?
Probably because there isn’t much to take pictures of. When was the last time a made in India capital ship (FFG/DDG) or even subs been inducted into the IN and at what rate do they get inducted? The Indian shipbuilding system, as it stands now, is broken. Maybe in 10 yrs after some of the newer private yards get to mature, the Indian shipbuilding industry will be worth taking pictures of.
Stealth is just one of the aspects of the 5G aircraft.
There’s also AESA raadar, which Russia has not fielded. There’s also engine technology, where Russia is behind the US, not far behind but behind ntl. There’s also the network centricity aspect as well.
There’re also the more subtle things as well like reliability, maintainability, operational costs per hour. In all of these areas the US has the lead.
So, out of nowhere, Russia will overcome the lead in all of these areas to leapfrog the F-22 and F-35?
Who’s wishful thinking are we talking about?
So, let me get this straight:
Stating that the PAK-FA will not be as good as the F-22 is sheer speculation and wishful thinking.
But stating that the PAK-FA will be better than the F-22 is reasonable?
Wokay…
Then why is it that you’re adamant that Sukhoi/Russia (with proven pedigree in fighter design & vast technical resources) are going to produce a turkey?
No one has said that the Russian 5G product(s) will be a turkey but to expect it to be better than the F-22 out of the gate is a bit of a stretch.
The next Russian carrier will be better than the CVN-78.
The next Russian HALE UAV will be better than the GlobalHawk.
The next Russian UCAV will be better than X-45/47.
…
Nevermind that Russia has next to no experience building or operating anything of the sort even today. Kuznetsov not counting…
Why? Because Russia has better mathematicians than the US. :rolleyes: