dark light

Victor

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 541 through 555 (of 1,377 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • Victor
    Participant

    things have change just think Kilos armed with Squal in Confined space of Persian Gulf!

    Feel bad for the Iranian Kilos and their crews. With complete air dominance of the USN and USAF over the crampped Persian Gulf, those Kilos can’t hide forever… it will have to come up for air.

    in reply to: Kuznetsov vs Vikramaditya #2057830
    Victor
    Participant

    Well, if someone thinks that operating a carrier and its SAG is not too much different from operating a SAG without a carrier, then my job here is done. I’ll leave you guys to continue to enlighten us naval n00bs about naval warfare. Have fun, ttys.

    in reply to: Kuznetsov vs Vikramaditya #2057838
    Victor
    Participant

    Yes, I understand professor. I’m talking experience taking off an actual carrier with an actual jet fighter instead of helos.

    Well, tell that to the RN (and the USMC) as well. They’ve been playing with helos as long as the IN has.

    in reply to: Kuznetsov vs Vikramaditya #2057854
    Victor
    Participant

    Carrier vs. carrier engagements experience? For a while the IN had two carriers and could practice against each other in real world scenarios. Now, the IN has exercises with most other carrier using nations for just this sort of thing.

    Also, discounting nearly five decades of carrier experience is a mistake. Would anyone suggest that a navy that is completely new to submarine operations be as proficient at sub ops as a country that has operated subs for 50 years? Why should carrier operations capability be different?

    Added later: Psst! The IN didn’t have SHARs in 1971, neither did anyone else. Oh, and Seahawks and Alizes were CATOBAR.

    in reply to: How Long Before Mankind Breaks the Light Barrier #2604384
    Victor
    Participant

    According to our understanding of physics and the nature of the universe as of this moment, it shouldn’t be possible to go faster than the speed of light. And by speed I mean d/t, not anything relativistic.

    Then again, our understanding of the universe as of this moment doesn’t even allow us to understand what 90% of the universe is made of. Either our equations are wildly off and/or we simply don’t have enough information to make even a decent SWAG; hence we wind up calling it something silly like “dark matter”. Not too far off from the Greeks stating that the universe was made up of four elements because that was their logical conclusion based on their understanding of the universe at that moment.

    Short answer to the question of the thread: we don’t have enough information to give an answer. Anyone stating that they can definitively state one way or the other also doesn’t have enough information but what they lack in information, they make up with strength of conviction 😉

    in reply to: IMPRESSIVE WEAPON LOADS THREAD #2566686
    Victor
    Participant

    An oldie but still going strong… Can take down the major cities of a medium sized country all by its lonesome. :diablo:

    in reply to: Latest on Indian ADS? #2060395
    Victor
    Participant

    Actually, Russians and a particular British firm had a lot to do with the design 😉

    in reply to: Latest on Indian ADS? #2060414
    Victor
    Participant

    The ADS or whatever it’s called is supposed to have two angled runways. More precisely, there will be no runway that is parallel to the CL of the ship. :p

    Here’s a CGI from the stern…

    in reply to: PLA (All Forces) Missiles #1817898
    Victor
    Participant

    Maybe not 500 miles but what about 50? The key point in my text is sq miles. Think of a circle, if the carrier is put in the center of it and its combat escorts in a 25 mile radius around it, that’s nearly 2000 sq miles of space being occupied by a relative handful of ships… and that’s a tight formation. They are even spaced farther apart, geography allowing.

    A truly massive nuclear warhead is required to have a moderate damage radius of 25 miles… in the order of a 50 MT weapon.

    in reply to: PLA (All Forces) Missiles #1817921
    Victor
    Participant

    One nuclear missile accurately targeted towards the carrier should be able to take out the entire battle group.

    Sean, elements of a battle group aren’t packed tight. It’s a loose formation based on information sharing and coop engagement and mutual support doctrine and not on any distance. A battle group is spread around 1000s of sq miles.

    A nuke tipped BM targeted at a carrier will take the carrier down, if the BM’s accuracy is <= zone of vulnerability of the carrier to that size nuke. Rest of the battle group will be intact. All this assuming of course that a SM-3 hasn’t shot down the BM in the first place.

    in reply to: Pakistan's Missiles and Strategic News/Disscussions #1818143
    Victor
    Participant

    Someone wrote this once, I wonder who it could be…

    yet just becouse a state is poor relative to another it does not mean it does not have the right to buy weapons.

    in reply to: It's official, RAAF to get C-17's #2576609
    Victor
    Participant

    A recent artricle in Aviation Week mentions Sweden as a possible customer for two…there was a lot of public outcry over the lack of such a plane following the 2004 Tsunami that killed hundreds of Swedish tourists. The planes would be used to deliver relief supplies, then bring back any Swedish nationals from a disaster area.

    Can’t that be done with a 747 combi? 😀

    in reply to: "F-22's for sale, get'em while they're got!" #2583472
    Victor
    Participant

    http://www.jsf.mil/images/f35/f35_technology_commonality.jpg
    Let’s go to the horse’s mouth… 🙂

    in reply to: "F-22's for sale, get'em while they're got!" #2583497
    Victor
    Participant

    The basic aircraft is something like 80% the same between each version I think.

    I think it’s more like 60% commonality.

    in reply to: Mirage Pulled Out Of Indian MMRCA Race #2585094
    Victor
    Participant

    Contrary to what some people may think, the Indian govt knows exactly what it wants:
    It wants the best strategic deal out of this rather large purchase. Just like when countries buy large amounts of Boeings or Airbuses, there are other strategic concerns at play other than just civil liners. Same with this fighter purchase. The fighters themselves aren’t the end, they are the means to the end. No matter what plane India chooses, it will be a good plane but the real commodity the Indians are purchasing is strategic in nature.

Viewing 15 posts - 541 through 555 (of 1,377 total)