dark light

Victor

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 676 through 690 (of 1,377 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: BrahMos thread – Part 2 #2047767
    Victor
    Participant

    I don’t know if the problem was rectified or not, which doesn’t mean that it wasn’t or that it was. The basic gist of the problem was a well known Russian trait of having subpar ECCM ability. The Uran’s ECCM was even more subpar than that, to the point where it was too easily confused and decieved even when no one was trying to confuse or decieve it ๐Ÿ™‚ I.e. the missile was being ECM’ed in a non-electronically hostile environment. The IN did not like this “feature”.

    in reply to: BrahMos thread – Part 2 #2047779
    Victor
    Participant

    What Kind of Critical Flaws in guidance for Uran , Do you have any credible link to support your claim.

    I have credible support but can’t link them. The terminal phase guidance was a “bit” buggy.

    in reply to: BrahMos thread – Part 2 #2047787
    Victor
    Participant

    The Uran, even early this decade, showed some critical flaws in its guidance logic. It’s not by accident that India took the lead in the guidance package for the PJ-10.

    in reply to: Indian Navy – News and Discussion #2051160
    Victor
    Participant

    I was led to believe that the project number for the Amur acquisition is P-78.

    in reply to: BrahMos thread – Part 2 #2047855
    Victor
    Participant

    VLS being retro’ed into Kashins and others? That would be a severe mod

    in reply to: BrahMos thread – Part 2 #2047859
    Victor
    Participant

    AFAIK, the Kashins might be the first to get the PJ-10s then the Tarantuls and then the first four of the Khukri. Of course, there might be some variance and mix and match in the order depending on which ship is scheduled for their maintainance and what missile handling quays are available at the respective bases. All of these will get the inclined launched PJ-10s while the new built ships will get the VLS version.

    Then the replacement of the SS-N-25s will take place but some smaller ships may not get them replaced due to weight and CoG issues associated with the bigger and heavier PJ-10s.

    in reply to: The Dhruv thread #2607984
    Victor
    Participant

    Hey Harry, is the Mistral 2 confirmed for the ALH and LCH?

    in reply to: Kuznetsov at Portsmouth?? #2053218
    Victor
    Participant

    It would be interesting to see if the first batch of IN Mig-29Ks do a stint on the Kuznetsov as that will be the only platform available for initial shakedown tests and IN pilot training.

    The Prodigal Son (29K) will return to the Father (Kuz), only temporarily though. DACT with the 33Ks would be a nice metric for the 29Ks.

    in reply to: Japan's new fighter #2613957
    Victor
    Participant

    The Japanese Navy will certainly get the JSF for their “helicopter carrying destroyers (DDH)” ๐Ÿ˜€

    in reply to: IAF- news & discussions- MARCH 2005 #2614385
    Victor
    Participant

    Will the Mirages come with their weapons or will the IAF be using S530Ds and MagicsIIs with the new birds?

    in reply to: YF-12/A-12/SR-71/MIG 25/MiG 31 thread #2615365
    Victor
    Participant

    Will the Mig-25s be replaced by M-55s?

    in reply to: India's New Anti-Ballastic Missile SAM #2048274
    Victor
    Participant

    Not totally out of the blue…

    Exerpt from Defense News Feb 28 05

    Indians Divided on Air Defense
    Weigh Domestic, U.S. Solutions

    By VIVEK RAGHUVANSHI, NEW DELHI
    More capable air defense has been a top government
    priority here for several years. To meet the Armyโ€™s
    future requirements, the DRDO diverted some funds from
    its missile program in January 2003 to begin
    developing its own air defense system capable of
    tracking ballistic missiles.

    The Research Centre Imarat (RCI) in Hyderabad, a
    premier defense laboratory that produces the Agni and
    Prithvi missile systems and is under the
    administrative control of DRDO, has been developing a
    system since early 2003 that would have a range of 100
    kilometers.

    A DRDO scientist said the previous National Democratic
    Alliance government was so impressed with the RCI
    proposal that $444.4 million was allotted in June 2003
    to complete the indigenous air defense system by 2008.

    Vijay Kumar Saraswat, RCI director, said Feb 10 that
    the system RCI is working on will be superior to the
    Patriot-2 and Russiaโ€™s S-300 PMU, and will be ready to
    enter service by 2008. Saraswat claimed the system
    will have a mobile launcher carrying three
    surface-to-air, solid-fuel missiles, equipped with
    directional warheads.

    He said the unnamed system will begin flight trials in
    mid-2006. RCI will carry out about 10 flights before
    deploying it with the Indian defense forces.

    The DRDO scientist said the indigenous air defense
    system will have a mission control system that will
    conduct target acquisition, classification and track
    estimation, among other functions.

    He said another major element is the active
    phased-array radar system purchased from Israel.
    Called Sword Fish, the system was purchased in early
    2004 for $50 million and is undergoing trials at Hasan
    in Karnataka state.

    Once the air defense system is operational, the DRDO
    scientist said, RCI will integrate it with other
    defense systems via satellite links and a secure
    digital data link that will enable it to track and
    transmit data up to a range of 1,000 kilometers.

    in reply to: INS Vikramaditya (ex-Gorshkov) #2054369
    Victor
    Participant

    The IN has plans to operate two fixed wing aircrafts from its carriers anyways -Mig29/Harrier then Mig29/NLCA- so they would have enough space and logistics to handle two types. Also, the IN is planning to operate at least two helo types from the carriers as well, Ka28/31 and ALH. So the Vikad and ADS will be built to take into account the nature of what the IN’s air fleet will look like.

    Regarding the total number of a/c on the carriers, we know that 17 can fit in the hangar and CGIs and pics of models show at least another 10 on deck…

    in reply to: Indian Navy – News and Discussion #2054433
    Victor
    Participant

    Folding wings add weight to maintain the same strength plus the weight from the additional folding mechanism itself. For a plane that is already small and has a reduced payload compared to its land cousin, the NLCA probably will not have folding wings.

    Added later: Also, folding wings might also reduce the fuel load due to the folding mechanism intruding into the original fuel tank space.

    in reply to: IAF- news & discussions- MARCH 2005 #2618828
    Victor
    Participant

    ๐Ÿ˜€

    Redefining the term ‘Air-Strike’ Wow! ๐Ÿ˜ฎ ๐Ÿ˜ฎ

    http://sify.com/news/othernews/fullstory.php?id=13715301

    Maybe they are testing just the seeker of something, perhaps Astra :confused: But regardless, ya gotta love the press…

Viewing 15 posts - 676 through 690 (of 1,377 total)