dark light

Victor

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 721 through 735 (of 1,377 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • Victor
    Participant

    Besides, don’t forget that swing-wing would not fit with stealth too easily.

    You throw enough money at anything and it can be made to be stealthy. 🙂

    But the point about the high power availabilities of modern engines is a good one.

    In the same sense, are there any over-arching design features that we see in this gen’s batch of new aircraft that could be suplanted by advances? For instance, is stealth the same kind of “fad” that the swing wing was? Or perhaps the canard-delta feature?

    in reply to: Should Pakistan go for the U214,Scorpene or Turquoise subs? #2061023
    Victor
    Participant

    Nope. Coop engagement works when youre tied in to the net. Submarines by unfortunate virtue of their operating medium must spend long periods divorced from external comms.

    Some of the major navies are moving towards fully autonmous long-range land-attack weapons but significant problems exist using SSK’s in this role without having dozens of SSKs to cope with the overhead of strike tasked units.

    We are talking about long ranged missiles, right? So…

    Prior to SSK engaging, i.e. firing the missile, the SSK is already at or near PD. Which means that it is fully capable of “interacting” with the outside world. And in today’s environment and particularly the environment that exists in that part of the seas, mainly the high merchant traffic, the shooter has to get a confirmed ID on the target. Where does the “divorced from external comms” aspect come into play?

    It only comes into play during the stalk and transit into and out of the OPS area, not during the shoot.

    in reply to: Should Pakistan go for the U214,Scorpene or Turquoise subs? #2061031
    Victor
    Participant

    The sonar suite they possess is comparable to that of most current SSK’s, the weapons capability is similarly comparable and I applaud their refusal to be forced down the ludicrous long-range AShM route that others are seeking to try and establish on an inherently short-ranged sensor platform.

    Long ranged weapons on short (sensor) ranged platforms is the future. That’s where coop engagement comes in. The major navies are moving in that direction, the days of lone sharks prowling the waters by themselves are gone.

    in reply to: China not happy with J-10, now cloning F-16 #2660076
    Victor
    Participant

    I can see why the article can be considered more opinionated than factual but that still doesn’t excuse the constant stream of insults at the person who only posted an open source article from a source who has some credentials AFA the Chinese military info is considered.

    in reply to: China not happy with J-10, now cloning F-16 #2660113
    Victor
    Participant

    My dear Victor, just look how criticism about Indian forces is treated the IAF news section. Even Janes is made stupid. Why asking others to be here and accept sentimental and negative propaganda?

    I’m not your dear… even if you wear red panties.

    Everyone has an axe to grind about something, I suggest that when anyone posts anything, we immediately beat down on them with personal insults for having an axe to grind.

    in reply to: China not happy with J-10, now cloning F-16 #2660137
    Victor
    Participant

    It’s funny to see that an open source article that even remotely resembles a criticism of J-10 is beaten down with personal attacks on the poster who posted it.

    Some people get their red panties in a bunch when criticised, I think it’s because they don’t have enough of it in their… society 😀

    in reply to: Indian Navy – News and Discussion #2061171
    Victor
    Participant

    A long time ago, the US was willing to sell midget super carriers to Iran, of course pre-revolution. The plan was to sell them two carriers to them.

    So, it’s not out of the realm of possibility that another Islamic state might recieve similar equipment for “services rendered”.

    in reply to: The Dhruv thread #2607014
    Victor
    Participant

    Looks promising if the price tag is allright. What do they ask for one?

    I think $3+ mil for a barebones systems with analog instrumentations and cockpit and Indian avionics. The pricetag becomes $5+ mil for a IAI outfitted,, all glass cockpit and avionics, with other bells and whistles.

    Not a bad price range for a 5 ton class helo.

    in reply to: Afghans want their aircrafts back from Pakistan #2607367
    Victor
    Participant

    Afghans should stop smuggling Heroin.

    Supply follows demand…

    in reply to: C-130J FLUNKS evaluation.!!! #2607465
    Victor
    Participant

    Throw China into that list as well.

    in reply to: C-130J FLUNKS evaluation.!!! #2607470
    Victor
    Participant

    So – what’s the point in buying the less capable aircraft for more money?

    To make sure they have that capability in the future in case the US puts sanctions on the EU.

    in reply to: Indian AF – News & Discussions – Jan 2005 #2607520
    Victor
    Participant

    The naval Dhruv is certainly a looker, especially from the angle of the previous pic…

    BTW, any pic of the naval Dhruv with its props folded as in ship board stowage config?

    in reply to: Indian AF – News & Discussions – Jan 2005 #2607878
    Victor
    Participant

    Jai, can you resize those pics and put them on the AFM server?

    in reply to: SOME GREAT B-52 PICS #2608241
    Victor
    Participant

    From the last pic, it looks like they are building a new batcave as well over there in the Pacific. :dev2:

    in reply to: SOME GREAT B-52 PICS #2608243
    Victor
    Participant

    That, ladies and germs, is what the term “Global Reach” looks like.

    Certainly separates the fakers from the makers, don’t it? 😉

Viewing 15 posts - 721 through 735 (of 1,377 total)