Actually, this thread should be kept separate because this thread compares the three aircrafts that will be fighting for sales for next two decades. This thread can serve the purpose of thrashing out each aircraft’s strenghts and weaknesses, of course based on facts 😉 .
Also, the Indian contract will most likely be the spring board that the respective companies need for future sales and this is one of the few markets that the US can’t screw around with, e.g. South Korea, Singapore, Australia, etc. So, theoretically, each aircraft has an equal chance of winning… not counting any Russian/French strong arm tactics.
Hellenic Navy maybe? 😀
Perrys were mainly for fleet ASW ops. Why would the IN want the old Perrys when the P28 ASW corvette order has just been placed?
$9 billion is an out of whack number. This acquisition will not be that large.
Also, increasing the output number of the MKI isn’t just about having more shifts at the factory. The IAF’s ability to absorb the aircrafts into its force and logistics structure is most likely the limiting factor… and money, of course.
If the resistance to the M2K is based on it “being just an upgraded version of a vintage aircraft”? Then all of the competitors (Mig-29 and F-16) would be excluded except the Gripen.
Obviously, the IAF and their procurement and force planning guys want a proven, low cost of operations, and high-tech plane with an initial price that doesn’t break the bank. That rules out all of the other candidate new planes on the market.
The engine exhaust is angled slightly downward, is that design feature meant to offset an extremely aft CoG?
Food for thought, first pic is of a Gripen with an Israeli weapon and sensor suite. It includes Python 5, Derby, Spice bomb range and precision enhancement kit and Litening 2 pod.
Second pic is of the IR-OTIS equipped Gripen.
:dev2:
Nope, the US doesn’t fund internal Israeli programs. That’s the main gripe b/w Israel and the US. The US funding goes towards subsidizing US companies, not Israeli ones. Hence, my point. I referred to the Israeli military INDUSTRY not the military. It’s not in the US’ interests to develop the Israeli industry hence Israeli funds the vast majority of its industry from internal resources. Nearly all of Israel’s success in the military export business has been on the back of its internally developed products. Please educate yourself first and then make snide remarks.
The Israeli military industry is in a pretty dire fiscal situation with their industry dependent on exports. Does that mean the Israelis can’t produce sophisticated stuff?
FYI, Russia is one of the fasted growing economies in the world, faster than some wanna be fast growing economies…
That rod and clutch system was one of the critical technologies that had to be mastered for the project to move forward.
The AV-8 has some of the highest combat and peacetime attrition rates within the US military fleet. Is that trend expected to continue with the F-35B?
US has its Roswell, now China will have its Lanzhou… and in a few years, there will be a lame show on the Chinese version of WB about children from Lanzhou 😛
Lift fan provides more efficient lift performance at the cost of engineering complexity, which translates into higher risk in design, higher operational risk, and higher cost of maintainence. With every engineering decision, there’s always design trade offs.
The X-32’s designers went with a system they felt had less engineering risk and something the USN was familiar with at the cost of lift performance. Also, the X-32’s system ate up less internal volume than the X-35’s.
What is a “gas-turbine boiler”?
Also, this news confirms that the ship will go through a complete machinery overhaul.