F-16s could very well be heading towards Pakistan. The USAF is talking about retiring 600 odd F-16s within a decade to a decade and half. Which means a lot of cheap frames will be hitting the market along with various upgrade packages.
This may be a bad thing for other, newer fighters hitting the marketplace as well.
THIS IS WHY YOU NEED SUSTAINED MILITARY MANUFACTURING CAPABILITY!
This is why very few countries in the future will be able to produce large military platforms. It not only takes wads of cash to build these things but also takes large wads to retain the corporate competence to build them later. Ask the British about the troubles they are having maintaining the requisite level of SSN and SSBN manufacturing capabilities, for e.g.
The first CG-47 Ticonderoga-class cruiser got decommissioned- the Valley Forge. The USN is getting rid of the older Ticos because they don’t have VLS- these are the first AEGIS ships to leave the fleet- Taiwan should get them.
That has already been mentioned as a possibility and it will be looked at after the Kidd stuff goes through. Operating four SM-2 equipped Kidds along with Aegis and SM-2 equipped Tikes would be a massive AAW and ASuW boost to the Taiwanese navy.
I am not sure but doesn’t Shafaqh resemble the new Polish trainer, whose name escapes me right now.
What?
What does PLAAF have to do with Indian, Pakistani, American, etc nationalities? PLAAF signifies PRC, which in turn signifies the ML Chinese nationality. WTF are you muttering?
I’m totally lost here
Couldn’t agree more…
I can already see the stealty characteristics, that the designer mentions, even in that early mockup.
!@#$%&*!… Joy ride, Mirage 2000-5, PLAAF Ace, Paris???
I guess PLAAF utilizes people of many nationalities in their force 🙂
300 AL-31s doesn’t necessarily translate into 300 J-10s. Most airforces keep a significant number of engines as reserve engines to be swapped in and out so that the aircraft is available even if the engine is not.
Not sure about how PLAAF does it tho and I could be wrong.
Iran Ready To Show Off Shahab-3 Missile
By AGENCE FRANCE-PRESSE, TEHRAN
Iran said Sept. 7 it is ready to show off a test of its improved Shahab-3 medium range missile, which is capable of hitting Israel, to “observers” in order to prove it is a success.
“The ministry is ready to organize a new test of the Shahab-3 missile in the presence of observers,” Defense Minister Rear Admiral Ali Shamkhani said in a statement carried by the official news agency IRNA. “The recent test that was carried out was a success.”
The minister appeared to be reacting to recent foreign press reports that questioned whether an Aug. 11 test had been a failure, noting that the missile had apparently been remotely detonated in mid-flight.
The Israeli daily Haaretz, however, has recently written that the upgraded version of the Shahab-3 had a range of 2,000 kilometers (1,280 miles), whereas the previous version was believed to have a range of 1,300 to 1,700 kilometers.
The Shahab-3 missile was deployed among the Iranian Revolutionary Guards in July last year. Although the missile has been paraded with the banner “Israel should be wiped off the map,” Iran says it is purely defensive.
In Persian, “Shahab” means “meteor” or “shooting star.”
———————————
We want to kill you and your kind but we are mostly defensive 🙂
There’s always better things to spend money on but tactical transport, inflight refueling, joint operations, etc are the foundations of any air force. The foundation has to be kept strong and relevant or else the money spent on the geewiz stuff like the F/A-22 and stuff won’t matter too much.
If by radical, you mean the stealthiness, that’s because of the applications calls for specop insertion and battlefield persistence. Both applications puts the platform at greater susceptibility hence the LO design to mitigate the greater susceptibility.
The first pic looks like it’s from the game Halo…
Some of the real life concepts that are hatched in the bowels of the US mil-ind complex are far far better than any photoshop job out there in internet land.
Q: How do you make the concept of the AC-130 even scarier?
A: Give it a big freakin “laser”!
🙂
But, does or will the Agni-III make that much of a difference (given that it’ll be fully operational by 2010) once it’s incorporated into the frameworks of India’s national defense?
Well, as long as the distance to Beijing doesn’t increase too dramatically between now and A-III induction time, the A-III should still be relevant. 🙂
But then again, plate tectonics could increase the distance and by the time A-III is operational, it may be useless against Beijing.
The EFV is not self-deployable over water. They have to be carried to the operational area by a LHA, LPD, LSD, etc type mothership. Also, since these amphib APC/IFV, the troops that will inhabit those APCs will need a mothership for lodgings.
Not a whole of navies have the vast array of large amphibious assault ships the USN is privy to.
The US Marines and the equipment and logistics they command are, in and of themselves, probably in the top 5 fighting forces in the world. That’s not even taking the rest of the USN, USAF, and USArmy in account.