So you want India to buy the FC-1 without any offset benefits?
Hey look, there goes Falcor and Atreyu 🙂
Originally posted by Ravula
Victor, Hope you don’t mind me adding one more line to yours.“what does it matter if a cat is black or white? as long as it catches mice” and don’t fall for a flame bait……..:D
i avoided this thread but i think everyone knows what this thread is about… a lame attempt at riposte for the thread regarding Pak and KSA nuke/missile transfer. 😀
How about China buys 250 LCAs and India buys 250 FC-1s?
The cold war would have been over long ago only if the USSR bought the F-104 and the US bought the Mig-19. :rolleyes:
The Soviets by all accounts won A’stan and established it as a puppet gov’t rather quickly with some niggling pockets of resistance along the western and eastern borders.
Only after the US started giving diplomatic and moral support to the Islamic fundamentalists did the Soviets encounter the morass that would eventually consume them.
Originally posted by Avinash
Does that mean that the US, UK and Russia stole the rocket technology from Germany?
Actually they did… immense amounts of it including the scientists and factories and wind tunnels… talk about spoils of war 😀
Only thing I have to say is: “what does it matter if a cat is black or white? as long as it catches mice”
Nope, not new. Cropped version of an earlier pic which showed the APU truck and IIRC, couple of bicycles.
Originally posted by GoldenDragon
Their economy doesn’t work either.
And I hear that its vodka is loosing its kick too. 😀
Originally posted by google
Is the money that they spend on acquisitions included in their defense budget? $5 billion a year is quite a significant amount.
Yes and no. 😀
There’s a special fund for bigtime acquisition with long lead times that is over and above the regular budget. But the regular budget also includes CAPEX for modernization as well.
It’s pretty nebulous. Indian budgets don’t hide the numbers, it’s all there, the trick is to root through mountains of other data to find that key nugget that is relevant. 🙂
So, from a couple of missiles misfiring we can safely conclude that no Russian missile works.
Damn, I knew I should have been awake for my stat classes.
Regarding the Taiwanese prez, how much of his actions/policies are actually having any impact on the ground as opposed to just vote getting gimmickry?
It seems to me that the major players; China, Taiwan, and the US are under the same or similar set of boundaries and limitations. A lot like a three way gunfight (a flawed analogy, I know but bear with me) where the US doesn’t have a stake at firing the first bullet, and neither does China or Taiwan. Because one bullet fired will be proceeded by two more and at the end everyone gets hurt. Of course this analogy assumes that all the players are rational in behavior. One crazy guy in the loop can upset the balance.
Let’s face it, any country can become peace loving once peace becomes profitable. Right now, for both China and Taiwan, peace is very profitable.
Would it be a viable assumption that status quo is the most desirable policy by all sides? The Middle Path, so to speak?
Ultralights and Saudi F-15s and Tornados, along with assorted Russian rejects littering the area.
Scorpene deal hasn’t been finalized… nothing has been signed.
$100 bil in 20 years? $5 bil a year on acquisitions? That’s hardly adequate for the Indian military’s modernization program. But, we all have live within our means I guess. Sigh…
Cooking the books
Burning of incriminating files (along with the buildings)…
It’s a regular Enron setup they got going over there. Looks like Bush and Pakistan are a perfect match after all 🙂
What relation, if any, does the M2 have with the K?