dark light

Victor

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 121 through 135 (of 1,377 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: Indian Air Force Thread 20 #2211336
    Victor
    Participant

    [url=http://www.stratpost.com/iaf-fighter-strength-to-dip-further%5DIAF fighter strength to dip further[/url]

    2027 will see the retirement of the remaining four MiG-21 Bison squadrons, the induction of two MMRCA squadrons and three squadrons of FGFA, bringing the total number up to 38 squadrons, with a shortfall of only four squadrons.

    But in 2032, with all new inductions into the Indian Air Force having already been completed, and with the retirement of six Jaguar IS/IM squadrons, three squadrons of the Mirage 2000 H/I and three squadrons of the MiG-29 B/UPG, it will see face an even higher shortfall of 14 squadrons and be left with only 28 squadrons.

    Sounds like a perfect business case to hit the gas on the AMCA now. Gives 17 years to get this thing into IOC. Partner up with Airbus Defense, Dassault or Boeing, if need be, to speed up the process.

    in reply to: USN UCLASS FLYOFF #2217555
    Victor
    Participant
    in reply to: Military Aviation News-2014 #2220475
    Victor
    Participant
    in reply to: Indian Air Force Thread 20 #2221357
    Victor
    Participant

    Big news for Akash, if it happens..

    http://www.janes.com/article/43164/india-losing-interest-in-maitri-sa-sam-joint-venture

    Current Akash orders are 8 IAF squadrons and 2 IA regiments. Looks like they will be doubled.

    There is also an Akash Mk2 in the works.

    What kind of a SAM was Maitri supposed to have been? Radar guided fire and forget?

    in reply to: Indian Air Force Thread 20 #2221556
    Victor
    Participant

    First KC-390 gets wings on assembly line – picture

    http://www.flightglobal.com/assets/getasset.aspx?itemid=57647

    Soooo….. how’s the MTA project coming along? Perhaps India backed the wrong horse on that one?

    in reply to: F-35 News, Multimedia & Discussion thread (3) #2221633
    Victor
    Participant

    Why are countries still ordering this plane? Don’t they read the aviation blogosphere and know what a sh!tty plane this F-35 is?

    in reply to: Russian Navy Thread 2. #2027486
    Victor
    Participant

    http://1.bp.blogspot.com/-tT8gWsb3M2c/U_71rt7twYI/AAAAAAAAADQ/8sY_bMods9s/s1600/Akula%2BI%2BBratsk_5_starboard.jpg
    Surprised that the props were allowed to just dangle in front of everyone like that.

    in reply to: Indian Navy : News & Discussion – V #2027487
    Victor
    Participant

    It makes sense to build an imported design because the eventual numbers might be in the 120s (edited) and the IN needed to replace the Seaking and Ka-28 yesterday. What doesn’t make sense is to have the IN wait for the 20-ton helo that HAL is designing or thinks it’s designing.

    Sikorsky is offering the Romeo for the initial 16 NMRH (ASW/ASuW focused) tender under FMS. They are offering the S-70 on the follow-on tender. As is my understanding.

    in reply to: Indian Navy : News & Discussion – V #2027489
    Victor
    Participant

    GoI to Scrap Current Naval Multi-Role Helicopter (NMRH) Procurement in Favor of Buy and Make Indian? Advantage HAL!

    If true, terrible news for the IN. From prior track record, I wouldn’t expect a HAL designed and built naval multirole helo to FOC till around 2030.
    Look at all the issues NH Ind. is having (or had) with trying to get the NFH up and running and NH Ind (the individual companies) has decades long pedigree in helo making.

    in reply to: Indian Air Force Thread 20 #2223488
    Victor
    Participant

    Indo-Russian Jet Program Finally Moves Forward

    NEW DELHI — India and Russia have finally sorted out all sticky issues that have been holding back an agreement on the Fifth Generational Fighter Aircraft (FGFA) program, a Russian diplomat in India said, ending the opening chapter of a program expected to build 200 jets at a cost of $30 billion.

    No Indian Defence Ministry official would confirm that all problems had been resolved, especially those related to workshare between the two countries.

    But Prime Minister Narendra Modi and President Vladimir Putin discussed the matter during a summit in Brazil in July,a source in the Ministry of External Affairs (MEA) said. Both leaders agreed the FGFA deal should move forward, the source added.

    In 2010, officials signed a preliminary design agreement between India’s state-owned Hindustan Aeronautics Ltd. (HAL) and Russia’s Sukhoi Design Bureau to jointly produce the FGFA for use by both countries. A final accord, which will pave the way for production, has been pending because the Indian Air Force hasn’t approved the design and the manufacturers have not yet ironed out how much work each side does.

    India has wanted to boost its workshare from 18 percent to more than 25 percent. Both countries have invested $295 million.

    The Russian diplomat said India’s share will steadily increase to 40 percent as the Indian industry matures, especially with respect to incorporating sophisticated technology into the aircraft.

    India and Russia will sign a final agreement on the program by year’s end, the MEA source said.

    Russia reportedly has also agreed to the Indian Air Force’s demand that the jet be a two-seat design; the prototype is a one-seater.

    HAL and Sukhoi Design Bureau have sorted the list of systems and subsystems that each side will supply, a HAL official said. According to the agreement, India and Russia will jointly develop the thrust vectoring system for the plane; HAL will supply the mission software and hardware in addition to the avionics suite of the aircraft.

    India’s beyond visual range missile, the Astra, is being developed by India’s Defence Research and Development Organisation, along with Indo-Russian BrahMos supersonic cruise missile, which will be mounted on the FGFA, the Air Force official said.

    The Sukhoi Design Bureau and HAL proposal for the jet is a derivative of the Russian T-50 aircraft, which is in the prototype stage.

    The Indian Air Force expects to receive the first FGFA prototype by 2016 for user trials, followed by delivery of two more aircraft in 2018 and 2019. The FGFA is scheduled to get into production by 2021, the Air Force official added.

    Four prototypes of the Russian T-50 aircraft have performed more than 300 test flights.

    An Air Force official said that is because India entered the program at a late stage of development, which benefits the Russians. The Air Force “wanted to get involved in the FGFA from the drawing board stage and it appears the FGFA project is to finance the Russian FGFA project.”

    The MEA official, however, said both countries benefit, adding that Putin and Modi reaffirmed that the project must move quickly as technical issues are sorted out between HAL and Sukhoi Design Bureau.

    I wonder if Astra Mk2 is being designed for internal carriage. But then again, this article seems too chipper and wiling to let bygones be bygones, so a pinch of salt might be needed.

    in reply to: Indian Air Force Thread 20 #2225111
    Victor
    Participant

    Air Force Dhruv in action in Kashmir. I hadn’t seen and EO pod on it before.
    [ATTACH=CONFIG]231656[/ATTACH]

    Credit: https://www.facebook.com/Tarmak007

    in reply to: The 'JUST A NICE PIC…' thread #2227502
    Victor
    Participant

    New Eyeracky AF bird

    https://lh5.ggpht.com/-74tA3aPNAtc/U2pe_fdFlBI/AAAAAAAAL1c/6KfHg7UJAxk/s0/F-16-Iraq.jpg

    in reply to: Indian Air Force Thread 20 #2232398
    Victor
    Participant

    Between this news:
    Australia considering more C-17s, KC-30 tankers
    and this news:
    No More An-124s On The Way

    At the International Air Transport Forum 2014, Russian Deputy Industry and Trade Minister Yuri Slusar said:

    “I am very sorry… The project for resuming the production and upgrade of the unique plane Ruslan is off the agenda. That’s too bad. The niches that the Ukrainians and we might have taken… Designers there and producers here…”

    :highly_amused:

    One would hope that if the IAF wants more heavy lift capability, they need to put their C-17 follow-on order in now or there won’t be anything left in the market.

    Victor
    Participant

    Or the NATO countries surrounding Switzerland wouldn’t allow Russian warplanes to transit through their airspace.

    in reply to: Malaysian Airlineus 777 shot down over Ukraine #2236934
    Victor
    Participant

    I’m not sure if this was already posted or not

    MH17 Missile Can’t Hide From These Internet Sleuths

    Based on the above information alone it seems impossible to deny that the rebels were transporting a Buk Missile Launcher through the region on the same day as the downing of flight MH17.

Viewing 15 posts - 121 through 135 (of 1,377 total)