dark light

K225

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 61 through 75 (of 149 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: Tubular Rivets- how are these installed #1168896
    K225
    Participant

    We have had the experience of reassembling the engine thrust frame for 5447 for the past month. Its not an easy task those “top hat” ferrules are a tight fit. As comented on earlier the structure is rigid without the bolts they just hold everything in place. The ferrules seem to be the critical pieces. I believe it was the hangar 11 site that indicated 30,000 hours to restore a Hurricane and 12,000 for a Spitfire, not sure how accurate that is.
    Just a few shots Mike Henniger took of the work in progress, test fitting of the rebuilt centre spar should be shortly.

    in reply to: Post your Firefly pictures here. #1185484
    K225
    Participant

    Some of the CWH Firefly I took at one of last year’s Vintage Wings open houses.

    in reply to: Hurricane Mk.IV #1185686
    K225
    Participant

    Thanks for those Jim, my dad worked on the Hurricane MkXIIs at Scudouc NB during the war. I had never seen actual operations pictures from this period. Its interesting that 5447 that we are restoring had the number 71 on the nose in the same fashion as 69 in the photos. I’ll have to check to see if it was at Bagotville.

    in reply to: A century ago… #1189589
    K225
    Participant

    This video on You Tube shows the actual flight, looks great. Its fantastic that thye went and ahead and did on Sunday, especially for the organizers who have worked so hard to put on this event. Alas as usual mother nature doesn’t always cooperate.
    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rYXRflJgJGg&feature=related

    in reply to: Hurricane Mk.IV #1198291
    K225
    Participant

    I ran accross this photo of what I believe is a MkIV.

    in reply to: Hurricane Mk.IV #1199234
    K225
    Participant

    Steve
    Great to see these used to go to the Hamilton Airshow years ago. Actually some of the most enjoyable events I have been to lately weren’t airshows either. The VWoC open houses are the same, I marshall so don’t get to take pictures. What a rush though being on the tarmac with the Lanc, two Hurricanes and two Spits all running at the same time.
    Here are a few a friend took at this years BoB open house at VWoC. I encourage him to show some of us marshallers in his shots ;>? The CWH and Russell Group are a great bunch a lot of fun being involved.
    Steve M

    in reply to: Hurricane Mk.IV #1200077
    K225
    Participant

    Thanks Mark
    When doing tours we do point out that the wing is not the original to the aircraft. I suspect the cannon were more for effect when she was with the Fighter Collection. They still get a lot of comment from the vets as well.
    Steve

    in reply to: Hurricane Mk.IV #1200407
    K225
    Participant

    Or this.

    in reply to: Hurricane Mk.IV #1200421
    K225
    Participant

    This was probably taken on the same day.

    in reply to: Hurricane Mk.IV #1200875
    K225
    Participant

    I have to pinch myself everytime I walk into the hangar at Vintage Wings. All of their aircraft are of such a high quality and condition. The Hurricane is one of the most beautiful, can’t believe I’ve actually been able to work on it.

    in reply to: Hurricane Mk.IV #1201103
    K225
    Participant

    I’ll have to ask if anyone knows why Hawker Restoration chose to fit this aircraft this way, I don’t know the story behind it. What I do know is the wing is from a MkIID. Having had to open it up to check the fuel bladders it clearly has the panels found on the IID and MkIV wings.

    in reply to: Hurricane Mk.IV #1202645
    K225
    Participant

    The Mk IV initially was designated the Mk IIE, it was a modified Mk II using the Universal or “E” wing which was not designed as a fighter wing. By the later stage of the war the Hurricane wasn’t a front line fighter. It was being used as a platform for ground attack. The “E” designation was also used on Spitfires for a wing that could carry variations on cannon and MG fits plus bombs underneath.
    “A” wing had 8 .303 Brownings,
    “B” wing 12 Brownings
    “C”, 4 20 mm cannon. There were bombs (250 and 500 lb x 2), 40mm anti tank cannon (RR or Vickers S type), long range fuel tanks (44 or 90 gallon, the smaller ones being combat tanks that could be dropped, the 90 gallon ones being ferry tanks), or up to 8 60 lb Rocket Projectiles (RP’s). All had been used with success from the Mk IIb onwards,
    “D” with 40mm guns was similar to a Mk IV,
    “E” or Mk IV differed in that it had an enhanced engine and a lot of armour protection around the engine, radiator and cockpit. Thus the Mk IV was far better able to operate when in a high flak situation than the Mk II.
    British aircraft used for ground attack, such as the Typhoon and Whirlwind, never had the armour protection, depending on additional armament, speed and manoeuvrability for protection.
    The Mk IV Hurricane because of the increased weight lacked speed and manoeuvrability compared to the Mk I. The Mk IV like the Mk IID had a pair of .303 Browning MG’s for sighting the 40 mm guns or for limited self defence.
    The MkIID wing fitted to the VWoC MKIV would be identical to the MKIV wing.

    in reply to: Hurricane Variants #1204857
    K225
    Participant

    Finally got around to asking I was told the Vintage Wings of Canada Hurricane MkIV is fitted with a MKIId wing.

    in reply to: Is this a viable way of presenting aircraft pictures? #1219232
    K225
    Participant

    With broadband only a matter of seconds, I started to count but only got to about 5 seconds and it was loaded.
    great pics i’m great Boxcar fan.

    in reply to: Hawk One arrives at Vintage Wings #1161894
    K225
    Participant

    Really looks good in the bright (though cold) sun. Performed well for Paul on the flight from Sault.

Viewing 15 posts - 61 through 75 (of 149 total)