Seems the pilots prefers the SH…? A bit surprising they don’t like the Rafale?
Whereas the industry (and probably also the finance department!) prefers the Gripen. And we all know what Lula wants…
http://portalexame.abril.com.br/blogs/primeirolugar/20091123_listar_dia.shtml?permalink=209594
And I love the first comment available there :
It seems that you were misleaded, my sources close to the FAB pilots tells exactly the versus! | 24/11/2009 – 13:30 | Roberto | [email]Rodrigech@hotmail.com[/email]
Or are they both trying to mislead ? :dev2:
lol
Didn’t even Embraer retract from saying their favor the gripen ?
Better wait for official figures on these stuff, there’s way too much lobbying, interests and biais around to get a real picture (apart that the bid is fought like hell !).
Larger aperture size of the Typhoon translating to some 1400 TRMs iirc.
ok, that’s a good explanation lol
Agreed, its just that I think as far as capabilities go, in airborne systems both Selex and Thales are equivalent having done a lot of research into AESAs.
hum, on top of fighter aircraft both ?
My take, based on what I have read so far is that the lead radar in the competition is probably the APG-79 (in terms of range, ausairpower estimates seem reasonable and place it as fairly capable), followed by the RBE-2 AESA & Captor M (if Captor E is developed it would move to the front w/ APG-79)
why would you put the Captor E before the RBE-2 AESA ?
Note – I am purely talking about range straight ahead, ignoring the advantages of the swashplate design (for simplicitys sake) and which design is more mature, fitted, ready etc.
ok…
Can I put some more elements here ? Indeed, I thought that one of the main effort in e radars, where put in the software. The hardware is crazily flexible, but one has to use its potential… That’s the reason why I would favor more e radar whose makers have a long experience with this technology.
=> in the end, that part of the reasons which lead the french air force to have the PESA RBE2 in the first place, to develop and use the software needed for such a radar and then to just have to switch to AESA for better range, knowing all the software would be already in place and ready to use. => this matters as well in terms of operational/effectiveness use of such an array BTW
I don’t see how this is relevant to the MMRCA: None of the competitors will have EO-DAS similar systems, nor will any have radars that are at the level of the the APG-81, IMHO.
hum, I thought the french Rafale, with its spectra, had quite a similar system, am I missing something ?
Pitting a US 5. gen a/c against a Swedish 4.5 gen a/c is… rather peculiar. The Typhoon ad Rafale would not have succeeded in that competition, that’s why Eurofighter and Dassault withdrew early, they realized they would lose in in any case, so why waste the money… When the Swedes were asked why they did not pull out like Eurofighter they admitted: “The Eurofighter team obviously had better intelligence than us.” MI-5 beats the Swedish intelligence service…?
hum, I guess the reason for not having the EF/Rafale was more that they both knew it wasn’t a fair comparison but just a show to be able to tell later they had evaluated every option. The EF/Rafale teams didn’t want to spend money for nothing, and history proved they were right.
Regarding the comparison of F35 vs EF/Rafale, let’s see first what’ll come out of this program in the end… We may wait quite a while before !
i would say as hell..:)
Damn 😉
i mean desisions is made throu an organisation that will eliminate the possibility of manupulation of any sort. one or to people that deside by heart before a evaluation, seems a little cowboy standards to me…
lol
That’s quite some wishful thinking isn’t it ?
But wait, we’re only speculating here… It’s not like the FAB explicitly said anything is it ? So, maybe it isn’t even some cowboy behavior here…
Anyway, in the end, it doesn’t matter much, the FAB’s evaluation is just one part of the equation…
And that’s quite lucky, if we were to stick to the soldiers opinion all the time we would be pretty **********d up since quite a while 😀 Isn’t there a saying like “War is a matter to important to be left to the military ?” 😉
hum… I’m now wondering whether I should have just put the line about wishful thinking … Well, it’s done, let’s move on ! :$
Opit,
As to who to ask if someone wants to know the truth about Rafale capabilities, I’d suggest that it’s better to ask someone who genuinely seeks to understand the reality of both strengths AND weaknesses (and Rafale has plenty of both) rather than asking a French fan boy who’s more concerned with confirming their nationalistic prejudices and preconceptions and with polishing an unbalanced, over-optimistic and exaggerated picture of an aircraft and its manufacturer.
you seem pretty pissed off for someone saying he is neutral and without prejudices.
Life is hard, looks like no one is perfect down here. Well, I guess it’s better to laugh of it, and to make his own opinion without following blinding any guy around… lol
They must be very well off if they can afford to not care much.. 🙂
if the current presence in the MRCA contest is simply meant to not be absent, then I feel in the long run it may be better for the IAF to not bother with the Rafale either. a company that appreciates the scale of the MRCA order and just how much revenue it could bring over the lifetime of the MRCA would be more amenable to upgrades or customised equipment for the IAF even if they present acceptable bills for non-recurring engineering work. In this regard and several others, I’m feeling more and more inclined to support the Gripen NG for the MRCA.
well, the point of this story was as well that Dassault might have lost money in the end in india, and that’s something not really appealing is it ?
Then consider this MMRCA contest : 6 contenders, lot of offsets, harsh competition on prices and qualities, high briberies involved almost for sure, a byzantine administration with foggy process, some competitors having all to loose (gripen NG, new mig) or even quite able of making monetary loss without wondering about it (I mean the USA, if they really want the deal)…
Doesn’t look like the competition you could dream to enter no ?
which is kind of weird…
is there any democracy thats works this way exept brazil?
??
You mean a democracy where the political power has the upper hand on the army ? Well, it should be the case in all democracies no ? Or do I miss your point like hell ?:o
It made me wonder whether they were expecting an announcement from the UAE, though he and Charles Edelstenne were surprisingly coy about the UAE deal, and there was some evidence that the Emirates may be having second thoughts.
BTW, quite some french seem convince that the USA are throwing all their might at stopping Dassault/France/you name it from selling the Rafale, because of it being one of the main, if not the only, challenger to the F35 which isn’t controlled by them.
For sure, it implies that the gripen – NG or not – is “enoughly” american for them to control its exports.
what do you say of that ? Jackjack, any comment as well maybe ?
I think it is high time the french come up with some real dynamic proposals – an all out rafale purchase seems well beyond the Indian budget of about 10 billion USD.
But the French could offer a mixed package with UAE+Greek M2k-5s + 60 odd rafales and weapons for that price. Numbers, quick acquisition and tech – all in one smooth cuppa. 🙂
USS.
some french posters (with way more knowledge than me) tend to assume that Dassault/France don’t care much about this contract. Somehow the current mirage story is said to have severly displeased Dassault/France. The current presence in the MMRCA contract would be more about not being absent than actually winning it. :confused:
Sorry, these are words from a friend of mine who’s a Gripen technician, he goes pretty much were the Gripen goes. He praised the Rafale for it’s power and beauty. And the Gripen pilots were having a tough(but fun) time at altitude against the Rafales. They said that they couldn’t shake the Rafale at high altitude. For the Gripen to be more competitive here the F414 is needed. Fitting it into the Gripen NG Demo proved to be rather uncomplicated, so in future we’ll see.
I was readying myself for interesting reads, I’m gonna cry 😉 Anyway, thanks for the answer and let’s see what the future will bring !
There was no domination. However the Rafale proved to perform noticably better at high altitude(where the exercise was conducted) thanks to a much healthier thrust/weight ratio. The situtaion awarness of the Rafale is good but it’s not exceeding that of the Gripen. The armament for the Rafale at this time was better. No low or medium alt engagements took place between the Rafale’s and the Gripen’s at this point, so for the Gripen being outclassed is stretching it beyond breaking point.
The Swedish ground crew found it hillarious that the software for the Rafale cockpit displays were windows based, with the classic sky and grass field background during start up! One of the Rafale pilots swore loudly that one had to go three steps back in the menu just in order to change the radio frequency, and then go the three steps forward to continue were you left off.
Surely the Rafale is an outstanding machine, but most of the time the mouth of french aviators are much more outstanding.
nice bits of apparently first hands reports 🙂 Do you know where I could read more of these (in English would be great :o) ? Reading the part regarding the comparison between the 2 planes performance would be awesome 🙂
This one either.. was a bit complex for me..if you could break it up, kind of lost you on this part.
well, I was simply 😮 trying to say that economics and reality will soon strike back at UK/US and other western powers, due to the economic crisis and the war in Afghanistan. The F22 being stopped so early is a good sign here, as well as the current debate about the RAF capability and what will become the F35 in the end…
Zedro, fair point about “expeditionary warfare” – but as far as wars go, India has been waging an undeclared ie counter guerilla war for the past two decades in first the Punjab & then Kashmir. Tally up the number of Indians killed – military and civilian & it will be a nasty bit. Second, India fought a brutal mountain war in 1999, almost went to war in 2001, and more recently, last year. So its not “all quiet” in India & preparations for a big one. Not to mention the umpteen Islamist attacks on population centers as well, most recent being on 26/11 last year at Mumbai. Given all that, India actually underspends versus its defence needs.
I don’t discuss that india has been at war recently many times as well, but, the way I see it from France, (Old Europe you know ;)), is that India’s recent wars were less hardware intensive.
IED and the like destroy quite a lot of hardware + force the UK army to use more of their not so many choppers (not to speak of using planes for most of the artillery jobs…).
Furthermore, waging a war close to home is both less expensive and “way better” to actually spend wisely your money. In the end, if some of the UK weapons are not as good as expected, it’s not like the home country might be at real risk (at least not directly). For India it’s pretty different there !
I dont have the numbers on the UK ratio to compare with….
me neither but I think it would help us quite well to have a better picture of the situation.
in the end, my final impression here is that western countries, with all their remote little wars, have lost the big picture and are way too much concentrating of the big ticket stuff (where a few big companies make a lot of money…). The return on investment seems at best foggy nowadays lol
Makes me think it would be even funnier to compare the actual number of soldiers actually fighting in Afghanistan (so without the ones taking care of all these expensive furniture), with the numbers in India.
Still about “bigger picture”, still, I don’t see Indian army close from the UK one in term of discipline and effectiveness (I may be wrong for sure, but that’s the way I see it currently). Having fought little wars all over the place still has some added value, somehow, before the cost of the kit kills it all 😉 Would you agree ?
Fortunately, for UK/US/Europe, war isn’t close from their borders and, regarding the taxes I pay, it looks like reality will soon hit back, between Vietnam, er, no, Pakistan-Afghanistan, and the financial crisis. So all these considerations might change heavily in the next 20 years !
Let’s not forget that India has two potents foes at her (its?his?) borders, China and Pakistan, whereas UK is all about wars far from home.
Coincidentally, India is “just” preparing for an eventual war, whereas UK is fighting one at the moment (and recently was fighting 2).
I would also be eager to know the R&D budget of both countries (and R&D/maintenance ratio), because it feels like UK is developing most of her hardware (either alone or jointly), whereas India is doing less indigenous developments.
And in the end, don’t forget this “nice” Military-industrial complex which does most of UK hardware (and of any western countries for that matter) : these guys are real genius when it comes to increase prices like hell !
On the other hand, Russia military industry is in pretty different position, which reflects positively on the kit’s prices.