dark light

ZedroS

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 91 through 105 (of 152 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: Rafale news III: the return of the revenge #2483336
    ZedroS
    Participant

    Oh, another point from the “EF fan club” against the Rafale, is that Greece partecipates in the IRIS-T program and Rafale isn’t certified for it (and if we ask Dassault for certification, the cost will fall on our shoulders).

    Arg, don’t start this “points contest”, it may never ends, even after 1 000 years and whatever the actual sales/knowledge :diablo: lol

    Once again thanks for your feedback, I now have a much better understanding of the situation. 🙂

    I still have questions tough, I hope you don’t mind :
    – what was the Greek reaction when France/Dassault presented the 2000-5 instead of the Rafale ? EDIT : it’s always funny, by the way, to see how much an offer can be off the mark. What the hell was the 2000-5 being compared to F15 and EF when the France had the Rafale. I don’t get the commercial strategy being !
    – why no process like the one in Singapour for the plane selection ? It looks like the process was quite paper based the first time…

    cheers
    ZedroS

    in reply to: Rafale news III: the return of the revenge #2483410
    ZedroS
    Participant

    Hi again 🙂

    When asking about why the HAF would favor the EF, I was meaning : did a lot of EF came in the past to show what they’re up to or was a “request for information” made (only for the EF?).

    In fact, up to now, for me, the Greek came suddenly a few years ago with “let’s buy X EF”, almost like a surprise. That’s why I was asking the question 🙂 Could you detail the way such a decision is taking up to you ? Is it an HAF question only or more a political one ? Because it’s not common nowadays that an air force is build with some “real” enemies in mind. UAE or Austria haven’t any real enemy to fear…

    BTW, what’s the position of Greece regarding technological offset ? I’ve never heard they were trying to build some “aerospace industry” but I’m quite surprised they’ve such an high interest in doing so for obvious reasons !

    ++

    in reply to: Rafale news III: the return of the revenge #2483588
    ZedroS
    Participant

    Thanks a lot Hyperion, it was a very interesting read, you provided a lot of very interesting background 🙂

    P.S.: Sorry for not being able to give positive info on what will happen, but fact is, we can only make conjectures.

    That’s normal. And whatever : time will time 😉

    Hell, if Dassault has the means to prove to our airforce that the Rafale can detect and shoot down the F-35 we may order 80 Rafales and everyone will remain with the mouth open! 😮

    Hard to prove ! We don’t even know yet of what the F35 will be able of and, furthermore, which version Turkey’ll get. However, it’s sure all this training time with Greece has a goal and this may be it.

    BTW, on a French forum I read recently that the Rafale has used/tried all of Spectra’s capacities (included the 3rd part of it which is never used in exercise in France for fear of spying) in Crete. Have you heard of it as well ?

    NB : I don’t plan to debate about the rightness of Greek perceptions about the Rafale (even if I feel some part of it to be quite off), since it’s quite pointless. Do we agree ?

    On the other hand, I was wondering where from the Greek Air Force had the impression/assurance/certitude (?) that the EF could defeat the F35. Is it just for all the talks about “the EF interception first role” or did they had something “stronger” ?

    in reply to: Rafale news III: the return of the revenge #2483901
    ZedroS
    Participant

    Hi Hyperion

    Could you give a few hints on why, up to you, the Greek gvt is going “so strongly” for the EF ?

    Thanks in advance

    Cheers
    ZedroS

    in reply to: JSF Priced atr $58.7M US #2493144
    ZedroS
    Participant

    As usual for the JSF, the numbers vary quite a lot depending on the source.

    For example, the US senator Levin is speaking of about $100 millions each there : http://levin.senate.gov/newsroom/release.cfm?id=298687

    so…

    in reply to: Rafale news III: the return of the revenge #2495864
    ZedroS
    Participant

    The EAU is not looking for Uk’s EFA Typhoon??? :confused:

    Some may think the Typhoon isn’t the best plane. Or choose some other plane for political reasons. Or look in between for the others planes just in case. Life isn’t white and black.

    Crazy isn’t it ? lol

    in reply to: Eurofighter Typhoon news II #2495905
    ZedroS
    Participant

    At the end, I guess who bribes the most has also its importance in this game… :rolleyes:

    in reply to: Top 5 fighters as of today. #2514295
    ZedroS
    Participant

    Considering the lack of information we have on all planes, and esp. new ones, I can tell without ever beeing proved wrong that the current 5 best airplanes are :
    1 – my favorite one
    2 – my 2nd favorite one (probably of a country I do like quite a lot)
    3 – my 3nd favorite (probably from a country which is a ally to mine but that I don’t like)
    4 and 5 : any modern fighters I don’t like but which are commonly put in this kind of ranking (probably from countries I really dislike).

    :diablo:

    lol

    I forgot the final sentence : this ranking is my own judgement based on my complete reading of modern fighter forums.

    And I forgot as well to add I’ve very well placed people in the loop who confirm this ranking, but out of privacy I can’t disclose theirs names. Be afraid though, these guys really know their stuff and are working on it everyday, having see it all already before ! So you can’t prove me wrong !

    😀

    in reply to: Strong winds from Europe – Rafale vs Typhoon #2531536
    ZedroS
    Participant

    As far as I remenber, the engines are smaller as well on the production Rafale (by 1 meter), am I right ?

    ZedroS
    Participant

    Good joke.
    Could you remind me the range of the MICA used in that simulation ?
    JOUST: 40km
    TAiwanese AF: drone shoot at 73km
    French AF: more than 80km

    😀

    Jackonicko, what do you say of that ? You’re the one who always refer to this evaluation, it would be nice to clear the matter for once.

    At the end of the day, Joust : joke or reality ?

    Providing the data given by glitter, it seems a lot closer from a joke than a reality, at least for the test they did at that time, with such kind of parameters.

    in reply to: Rafale news #2541619
    ZedroS
    Participant

    No, I don’t already know the answer.

    My mistake, I was thinking that a reporter like you, having been abroard and speaking so dearly about both the Rafale and the EF, would be more up to date. I mean, it’s the journalist who’s supposed to dig out the good information and put it to light, not the forumer.

    But whatever, it’s nice to see you’ve gotten your information. I hope you’ll still double check it, we never know to who we’re speaking on such places !

    in reply to: Rafale news #2541919
    ZedroS
    Participant

    So no helmet, as it stands at the mo?

    No helmet at all. French pilots are real men, they fly bare head, with the cockpits wide open (saves money as well, a cockpit would be soooo expensive for the poor french only made Rafale).

    Another question whom you already know the answer ?

    in reply to: Rafale news #2542348
    ZedroS
    Participant

    But where do they put 4x2000L ? Two under each wing ? Crazy !

    in reply to: Rafale news #2544583
    ZedroS
    Participant

    Besides, Rafale will be overkill in many out of theater operations. In my opinion of flight of Link-16ed Mirage 2000D would be all one would need for operations over Afghanistan and for most peace keeping operations. Don’t forget that in addition to the double ventral pylon usually carried, you have the 4 belly pylons that can definately carry GBU12 or CBEMS/BANG for a total of 5 in addition to the LDP + the wing tanks + 2 Mica IR.

    Nic

    On the other hand, Rafale is easier and cheaper to maintain, and it counts especially when abroad, where you don’t have all the facilities required.

    Furthermore, 2 engines mean a lot more safety and possibilites for both the plane and the crew, and it’s again quite important for a place like Afghanistan.

    Then, the superior range of the Rafale is once again a very good thing for missions in Afghanistan. Thus it can stay longer in position, meaning less planes involved.

    And, finally, if some Rafales were sent to Afghanistan, it may be first of all for advertising purpose, so all of our discussion is more or less groundless.

    in reply to: Rafale news #2522672
    ZedroS
    Participant

    As far as I can determine (and Dassault and the Armée de l’Air are coy about weights), Rafale C weighs in at 10,300-kg empty in operational fit. That DOES NOT INCLUDE CFTs. Dassault now admit only to “about 10 tonnes” (“une masse à vide d’environ 10 tonnes”) – the old 9.1, 9.3-9.4, 9.850 tonne figures were an aspiration, but were seemingly not achieved, and are superceded if not discredited. Wing area is 45.7 m2.

    lol ! 9,850 tonnes doesn’t seem for you to be in the “about 10 tonnes” range ? I just love the way you jump on the conclusion the plane didn’t achieve its goal about weight with just this fact…

    What about considering the AdlA claims of “about 10 tonnes” to be right and fair considering some of the Rafale are 9 850kg and other lighter ? Could they claim the plane to be of the “9 tonnes class” ? I already see some people attacking them for lying if so…

    And what’s your point about CFT ? Rafales in AdlA don’t use it, so… :confused:

Viewing 15 posts - 91 through 105 (of 152 total)