So when will Trishul find an employer which is happy with him? Getting fired five times won’t look good on his resume.
when IN says its ok after user trials.but then if Hard Isreali lobbying and undercover media managed reports come as frequent as its been b4 IN finally went in for Barak .. then it might took a bit more….
Trishul is land-based, so the Baraks, being meant to counter Ashms, would logically seem to be destined for sea basing.
nope thats not fully correct there are 3 variants of Trishul meant and its the Naval version thats more challenging…. abt the IA they wanted their AD units to move on the fire and thats what made the DRDO to go back to the table for the Akash and Trishul …. abt IAF am not clear…..
and plzz someone repost the above image as it wont stay long from where am linking it up now….
kl here is a pic of Trishul firing (not actually firing, but ready) … and it looks like a silo version.maybe the VLS version thats getting ready …. am not sure……
if someone got the original link plzz post them

Well that was the version that had the problem with the guidence. Hopefully that has been sorted out now- do we detect israeli inputs here
well no way and I wanna Isreali’s to be kept out in this ….. they are the one undercover to make the Trishul so damn crticized for failures when fully knowing that it was a challenging one as it was the first of its kind that India undertook..but then those heading Gov don have indeendent analysis and depends on what external media’s has to say…….
Hi All , Trishul Missile is perhaps the most sophisticated short range missile ( 300mtrs-9000mtrs) of its kind , It has a Top speed of Mach-4.5 , and its a very agile missile made entirely of maragning steel capable of with standing high G-loads , It has a powerful Ka-band Guidande , capable of burning throu most of the countermeasures , Thats true for all k-ka band frequency , It uses a Fly-Catcher antenna for survellence , Tracking , and missile guidance , It uses command-guidande as a means of guiding missile , Till now the Naval system had guidance problem and as oon as the missile used to be launched it went erratic , But now DRDO has seemed to have solved it with the new guidance system , Both the Army and Airforce wiill use it as Anti-Aircraft , Anti-Cruise missile Missile replacing in the long run the Russian SA-8/13 , But the Naval variant which has an interesting role as anti sea skimmer role, Capable of hitting Subsonic & Supersonic missile (Even the barak dosent have capability to hit supersonic dancing AShM ) its way better than Barak missile as it has higher speed M-4.5 as against M-1-1.5 and is more agile & monuverable , Though both of them uses the same Band namely K-Ka for guidance , DRDO is developing a VLS system , A phased array antenna , currently it is using a conventional rotating antenna , and also trying to increase its range to 15km ofcourse I am talking about Improved version of the system , The system in its present form server the purpose well for all the three services
I agree to what u say…… hope this goes fine this time …
k now here is a comparision for the conventional radar vs AESA radar of the F-22…note that the conventional radar here meand (I suppose is not the N001M (?) but of the earlier variant…

and check out from the earlier chart for the RCS figures…..of the same……
and guys plz do repost these pic coz it wont stay there for long from wher i am linking it from now….
well the above pic wa when even the first MKI prototype was not out and as from the aussi aviation fig…u can see many things missing in this on……k now some pic of the N001 .. just see what that “M” makes the difference on the N001M bars….

N001

N001M bars
Soc can u tell morea abt the Carlo Kopps argumant for the Sukhoi’ am hearing it for the first time…..
well here is some more picts….. but again u guys repost all these as they’ll say only for 11 days (except for the aussi aviation ) ….

Hmm just me. Rather than a 2 Seat Su-30, I would rather have a single seat SU-35. Reason? The extra little bit of gas from no second seat is a “nice to have” when dealing with all that water
well don u think its to be reserved for Rafale and others…… coz Su-30 is a 2-seater and that surpasses range than any other fighter….
I can agree with the hypothetical threat argument-the F/A-22, EF-2000, and Rafale were all designed to challenge advanced Su-35s and MFIs…and as of last count there were none of either in service with Russia
Actually the USAF is drawing down if you look closely. Older aircraft are going to be replaced with smaller numbers of newer aircraft (of course, that has more to do with money than anything else, really).
As for why the US needs such a large Air Force? Easy, we tend to stick our nose in everybody’s business. Not saying I agree with everything we do (especially since it means I have to travel halfway around the world to some remote inhospitable climate ), but if you’re going to go that route, you need the military to be able to back it up.
well yeah, first one might be correct but i don think its gonna hold for long .. not coz the soviets are coming back, but the a/c as such will be rivalling for market shares and French have been working pretty hard to find even one customer for Rafale …and hardly many know that Russia is on recovery and their economy grew at 6.6 % (i don really wonder as to Y no western media report these, is russia not a part of Europe?, but then …. ) and I feel pity for what the rest of the world quotes from the Russia bashing western media abt the state of afairs that Russia is in rather than to have an independent analysis and report …..
yeah i know US is downsizing and its coz of funds rather than anything else, but not drawing down enough to set to rest that US has no hidden agenda (American Century) which has been allwyas associated with US govt policies … and the first step to assurance has to be by scrapping the NATO – it was meant to counter the Soviet threat, now as there is no Soviet there is no need , and in turn a European Defence force wud be fine as the France is saying … but then there is this $hity Govt policy which will make sure that NATO is not disbanded ..
I’ll say US interferring in others affairs for their own undercover intrests is the main cause for all tensions and the revrsal of the same wud do good for world peace and every american citizen shud understand this … but i really don know h many really care or atleast h many ordinary american’s know what all $hits the US gov does outside for their greed …. now i must put in here the case of N Korea… am an strong advoate for the unification and i don have any doubt thats possible if the US stays out, if Germany can do it, there is no reason as to y Korea can’t …. and what the world now flashes now and then abt the danger abt the DPRK N-weapons etc….on the bais of wstern analysis, i feel pity that the retards in the Indian media too take that. for me …if ever N Korea’s weapons programme has becaome a real threat to anyone , its not US (its so far offf….) not japan, or S.Korea , but its India – Yeah INDIA ……. its their long range missile that is now tipped with N-warhead which Pakistan flashes (atleast) which can reach most of the cities … and these transfers were all under the watchful eyes of the Unkil so as for their ally (condom wud be more suitable, like the way US is using pakistan) to have parity with India … and if ever any N weapons is unsafe its only in the hands of the Pakistan with the danger of falling into jehadi hands, and of course the other first strike ploicy groups advocating use of these even on N-nuclear weapons states and “is to be used” advocates as we saw recently from US and UK …. even though i’d have like to see the chineese side pay for the blood of indian soldiers that dropped on the icy mountains in ’62’ (again for some Idiot’s policies) …. i consider China far more matured in their Nuclear card than US and UK who have been talking so loosly abt using N-weapons … and these are who tell India to show restrain …. what a pity
well SOC , where u work, posting??… I heard ur in USAF , but what unit … if u don mind replying – go ahead, if not i don mind .. and one thing that ur avatar – that N-explosion or MOAB (?) just don feel good to me (but then its ur liberty to choose what u want, and i can’t argue abt that) …. I’ve seen no one using those til now (or maybe I missed), fighters bombers etc are fine, but the N- thing is a different matter…. what that reminds me is of those bloody $astards who bombed Japan for testing their new weapon and then citing in the succeding yrs as to how that bombing made the war end…. I call it damn BS… any way Japan wud have surrendered, coz little was left to hold on … but then histroy that world now sees and read is all scripted by the Aliied forces …. and thats a real pity ….
well….. i don have all those……. and what i posted was not from this article.but from an earlier one…… I’ll post the Flanker Growth possiblitiy chart… thats on the page -4 but what i’ve got don have many things that u find on that page…….will take time.let me upload it
well SOC i wont agree to ur .view abt the Kopps argument…..if thats the case..y does the US needs so much AF….and still building up .. USSR is no more……and all these future thing are just based on hypothertical threats etc etc….. and i just don like what the US Govt does…
now the above pic is what u can see in the article itself with the graph not for the new seekers….. and below the graph for other radars …..

k here is a chart from Carlo Kopps 96-97-98 periods for the radars …. now this pic is to remain for only 11 days as am posting from temp ..u guys repost it …as am not able to post it from pc in here

SOC u mean abt Karlo Kopp…..??…….. well im guess his article on AIM-9 and Python-4 is used allmost all sites….. and i really wonder y he did not even think abt the F-15E??…. either they don match up to the Su-30 or he considered a wastage of money which cud be put on F-22…..



