dark light

Maskirovka

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 46 through 60 (of 234 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: SAAB receives order for Erieye AEW&C system #2391374
    Maskirovka
    Participant

    Interesting note about CARABAS technology. Do you know more details about it ? It must be some kind of software piece that is usually coupled with CARABAS that is applicable somehow to the data captured from Erieye or any of the other sensors apart of the package. (Seeing as the basis for the actual concept of CARABAS is SAR mapping in VHF band, which is not attainable by the T/R modules in Erieye which works S-Band).

    Not in detail. Let´s just say that SAAB incorporates the latest design works from their every project into their new products. The Erieyes bought by SA or Pakistan is not the same systems bought by Sweden in 1995, the Swedish systems also gets upgraded (updated?) every once and a while and are not the same. When the big earthquake hit Pakistan in 2005 Sweden sent a couple of prototypes of Carabas there to search for survivors. It was so successful Pakistan wanted to buy them and SAAB simply replied, why not just incorporate them with Erieye? Voila´!
    The new Erieye can actually locate people that are hidden inside houses or rubble. The Pakistanians wanted them primary to hunt terrorists in rural areas. Just like Brazil uses them to hunt drug smugglers in the Arizona jungle.
    Erieye is very versatile, SAAB has really hit the jackpot on that one…
    (But the hails should offcourse go to Ericsson Radio Systems)

    in reply to: SAAB receives order for Erieye AEW&C system #2391417
    Maskirovka
    Participant

    Anyhow

    i think this sale of Saab-2000 AEW&C to Saudis will also backup PAF’s decision to go for Saab-2000 instead of EMB-145 (which offers slight speed and altitude advantage) was criticized in some circles. Brazilian Air Force and Hellenic Air Force of Greece and now Indian air force have chosen the EMB-145 as platform for the AEW&C

    IIRC this new (or updated) SAAB 2000 machines actually offers more loiter time then the EMB-145, but with a more economic platform. Remember when the 2000 was created “the performance of a jet, but the economics of the turboprop”. The speed is some inferior but the altitude pretty much the same. But are these issues really matter when you are deciding a platform? Isn´t the main thing what it can perform and its availability?

    in reply to: SAAB receives order for Erieye AEW&C system #2391591
    Maskirovka
    Participant

    It is a term of racist abuse in some English-speaking countries including the UK, where this site and its owners are based.

    On a broader note, this thread is becoming personal and heated (and one or two individuals may be hearing more about it later).

    Calm down and remain on topic, please.

    Thanks

    GA

    Thanks for the lesson. That is very, very …strange. Swede, Finn, Brit etc. But short for Pakistanian is racist? You learn something new every day…
    More on topic. The Saudis (hopefully not a racist term) are interested in almost every branch of the Investor that have any connection to military products. And they are not shy about it. Thanks to god the Wallenberg family are true patriots… But sometimes money does talks…..

    in reply to: SAAB receives order for Erieye AEW&C system #2391609
    Maskirovka
    Participant

    You just contridicted yourself on the US Embargoe/Gripens thing, but never mind. Yes, lets get back to topic.

    The total contract price seems a hell of a lot for just one SAAB 2000

    It´s not only one Erieye system. God damnit. Read the previous posts.

    (It is 2 systems + 1 “learning system” so in fact it is 3. You get it. 3 pretty planes flying in the blue sky with shiny radar-thingies attached to them. And you can´t compare these to the ancient american systems they have. These new Erieyes have the capabilities gained from the Carabas. (just like the Pakistan ones) Don´t know about Carabas? Google it…)

    Edit: Is **** a swear word? I thought it was just short for Pakistanian.

    in reply to: SAAB receives order for Erieye AEW&C system #2391631
    Maskirovka
    Participant

    Exports are decided by ISP (http://www.isp.se/sa/node.asp?node=410) which by law is govern by pretty tight rules, but in practice is not due to creative specification of different systems.
    For instance Erieye is not considered a offensive system and can therefore be exported to a broader range of countries. To examplify Gripens to Pakistan was not given export clearance, but Erieye was.
    Same applies to pretty much every sensor suite, like Giraffe AMB, MAW-300 etc..

    Oh. And those interested in finding out what this and future/past “secret customers” can check out ISP’s annual reports which specify the value for every contract, to what country, the past year.

    How would you consider the Bill2 ATGM? Offensive or defensive weapon? CV90? Bofors 57mm gun? or even the Gripen….

    in reply to: SAAB receives order for Erieye AEW&C system #2391854
    Maskirovka
    Participant

    Dont count on it. We have very strict laws regarding export of (offensive) weapons to dictatorships or “conflict countries” in Sweden. For good and for worse. Both UAE and the Saudis approaced Hägglunds to accuire CV90s some ten yrs ago, but the government put a stop to it on a very early stage.
    Most W European countries (spare France) have these laws. But the regulations are especially tough in Sweden and Germany.
    Some Swedish companies have compensated for this by smuggeling weapons through third party countries. Howitzers to India and RBS70 to Pakistan are just two examples. (Today India is regarded a fully democratic country, so all export limitations to them have been lifted).

    Don´t know what you are talking about. The howitzers to India or the RBS 70 to Pakistan was certainly NOT smuggled. It was legit sales.
    Yes we have strict law regarding arms sales abroad. In fact, every arms sales is de facto illegal by Swedish law and has to be approved by a special committee. Those guys then decides if it is OK or not.
    In 2002 Sweden and Saudi Arabia signed a defense deal which included sales of these kinds of weapons, they were given the green light. Now when they have the green light, almost every weapons sale to them can (and will) be cleared as it is seen as a “follow on order”. The Erieye is not the end of this partnership, it is just the beginning…

    in reply to: SAAB receives order for Erieye AEW&C system #2391901
    Maskirovka
    Participant

    According to Jane’s Saudi Arabia is the buyer.

    http://www.defence.pk/forums/military-forum/75879-saudi-arabia-signs-up-erieye-surveillance-system.html

    As I said already in post #2. It´s not just the Erieye. You will see more Swedish weapons in the hands of the Saudis in the future…

    in reply to: SAAB receives order for Erieye AEW&C system #2392323
    Maskirovka
    Participant

    There has been a discussion about a possible order for Erieye from Colombia. As far as I know the Swedish authorities did give a preliminary license for the deal some 2 years ago.

    But Sweden or SAAB have never kept any of their sales to Colombia secret before.

    The only recent “secret” deals from SAAB I can think of is the Arthur to various countries involved in either the Iraq or Afghanistan war. And then we were strictly talking tactical reasons, not political once… (once in this sentence is grammatical wrong, I know… onse? ones?)

    (I am talking new contracts, not follow on orders. Like a order to Pakistan could be classified as a follow on order depending on the contract)

    in reply to: SAAB receives order for Erieye AEW&C system #2395170
    Maskirovka
    Participant

    Saudi Arabia. It´s a package deal that includes a whole bunch of stuff. From BILL 2 atgms, to Erieyes, naval radars/etc and a military hardware contract with Sweden. It was actually signed already back i 2002 but starting to come into fruition now. The details of the contract are secret due to…well it´s Saudi Arabia who is the customer.

    in reply to: Saab JAS 39 Gripen Info # 2 #2418213
    Maskirovka
    Participant

    I believe RBS15 is included in the Thai purchase.

    That´s true. Makes me wonder if Thailand is planning on introducing the missile in their navy as well.

    in reply to: Rank the best to worst fighter companies! #2390029
    Maskirovka
    Participant

    Just out of curiosity… Which one out of SAABs 7 or so different fighter-designs from the 1940s til´today do you think was its “one-hit-wonder”? And I´m only talking fighters, not attack-planes, bombers etc….

    in reply to: Indian Air Force – News & Discussion # 13 #2380996
    Maskirovka
    Participant

    The print additions didn’t have them, I found out. Even in the online edition, these two usually carry the bland PTI print.

    But during Aero-India, Shri. Rajat Pandit and Shri. Manu Pubby run blitzkriegs on the “roaring Gripens..” and the ” stormy Typhoons ..”

    ——————–

    Now, it may be a bit unfortunate that Tejas is still referred to as an “LCA”. True, back in 1987 it was indeed an LCA, as it was meant to be no more than a MiG-21 back then. But it has clearly shed it’s MiG-21 “baby skin”.

    So, today which jet qualifies as an LCA ? The trainer jets like Hawk, IJT Sitara etc. are actually LCAs — around 4.5 to 5 tons of empty weight. These trainers have secondary rat-a-tat capability, and they are almost always pressed into service during wartime due to this. These are used for what is called, “point-defence” or “area defence”, in which they’re used as a last line of defence of an important installation, or an air base, against enemy raiders.

    Tejas clearly does not fall in this category. A MiG-21 does, but then a MiG-21 is no Tejas.

    http://www.business-standard.com/india/news/tejas-boosts-test-programme/397143/

    “But, the IAF is less exuberant. Senior air marshals point out to Business Standard that, if they grant the Tejas IOC at the end of 2010, it will be in the long-term interest of the fighter programme, not because the Tejas has met all its targets. The Tejas does not fly as fast as originally planned; its acceleration is significantly less; and the Tejas has not been tested yet in carrying much of the weaponry it is designed to.

    To me it seems like the LCA is more or less a MiG-21. The radar and such may be top notch but not the performances. But the MiG-21 can be upgraded, and it has been done, even by India. Do you think that the IAF prefer the Bison to a inferior (in performance) LCA or one of the MRCA contenders?

    in reply to: MMRCA News and Discussion IV #2391766
    Maskirovka
    Participant

    I have been reading Vishnu’s posts on BRF and have followed his documentaries as well on TV. He is not biased as Abhimanyu is claiming. He has flown on Russian fighters, he covered the F-16 in the US, and he has flown several IAF and IN fighters, including Sea Harriers. If there are a few defence correspondents in India with good contacts, Vishnu is one of them.

    Here´s his take when he flew the Gripen;
    http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=-6283740494513010615#

    On youtube I found another Indian guy flying with the Gripen, one Shiv Aroor. At first I thought they were the same guy…
    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=k_RJIHkLvfs
    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qEpJRTcycFk&feature=related
    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NleOwIYJKTQ&feature=related

    in reply to: MMRCA News and Discussion IV #2392136
    Maskirovka
    Participant

    It´s a quote from someone in the SAAB-team. From another forum.

    The reason Gripen is mentioned now I suppose is because the Gripen NG Demo landed in India on monday and started its testflights yesterday. (Before that SAAB have been flying the Gripen D in India). But Indian pilots have been flying the NG Demo in Sweden back in April as you see in this link;
    http://livefist.blogspot.com/2010/05/flash-gripen-demo-clears-leh-trials.html

    And yesterday this article was published
    http://www.idsa.in/idsacomments/MMRCAAdifficultchoicefortheIAF_rphadke_190510
    where the author in his last paragraph may seem to be pro-Gripen…

    in reply to: MMRCA News and Discussion IV #2392164
    Maskirovka
    Participant

    can i ask, is the use of the word “beautifully” unimportant? Or is this journalist biased toward the Gripen?

    Its probably just a cultural thing, but “beautifully” is the sort of thing you would say if you were personally very happy about something.:confused:

    Don´t know about biased towards the Gripen, I´ve seen the shows when he has been on ride-alongs with different MRCA aircrafts and I think he has praised everyone pretty equal.

    As a side-note I just read a post from someone who is involved with the Gripen-project. He just stated that the Gripen took off at 04.50 CET with a SAAB-pilot and an Indian (airforce-pilot?) in the backseat. And that sometimes it´s fun to set the standards, with a Demo-machine, that its (more proven) competitors can´t match up to. It was simply a good day at work…

Viewing 15 posts - 46 through 60 (of 234 total)