Why not just start with the “Rod Machado” school included with FS2004? 😉

I see a few votes for the 1/24th Spit’ 1a… 😉

Best…? Worst…? :confused:

The moulding and fit of all Airfix kits was some what “challenging” to say the least.
Or is it that we can say that now because we’ve all got used to the “Modern” quality of the likes of Tamiya and Hasegawa etc.

GR is Ground attack, Reconnaisance…

I appologise for any confusion, I missed off the Recon’ bit. But my point was that the GR designation can be broken down into “Ground Attack” and “recon”.

And “Ground Attack” means Bomber (as in, to attack the ground), not fighter. This would be, as you point out… FGA, or FGR.

And yes the Bucc’s were designated with the prefix “S”, but also carried the suffix “B”, eg S2B… A bomber.

Since when was the SR-71 a fighter?

Nevermind the SR-71.

These two shots of the Buccaneer show pure design genius.

But what about the Tornado GR1/4?
.
.
.

The Harrier GR3 or maybe the GR7?

Since when were these fighters?

whoa! 235kias on finals!! talk about excessive speed. Nice shots none the less there

235 with flaps at 20. And descending at 2000 ft pm 😀 😮 😀

The Buccaneer has always been one of my favourites too.

Although these two pics are nice, it’s not really a fighter is it? 😉

The lighting effects in the 2 KLM shots have got a real “Moody” look to them.

Great screenies.

Hello.

Me again. 😀

You might liketo have a browse over this website. Lots of customer related information here…

http://www.airlinequality.com/index.htm

Enjoy. 🙂