dark light

Pte1643

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 226 through 240 (of 241 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: Gatwick Nostalgia (80's) #600463
    Pte1643
    Participant

    You mentioned BCAL’s only 747; they operated 5 a/c just prior to the BA merger.

    Maybe not in 1983. 😉 I still have my copy(s) of “World Airline Fleets” from this era. At this time there was only 1, although I am happy to be corrected.

    The a/c in question was G-BJXN “Mungo Park-The Scottish Explorer” (Ex N611BN).

    And Yes, the 707 in the photo was operated by Anglo Cargo, NOT Anglia Air Cargo as I stated.
    Sorry for the confusion. :confused:

    in reply to: Gatwick Nostalgia (80's) #601097
    Pte1643
    Participant

    More (80’s)… From Heathrow this time.

    OK these few are from Heathrow, same era (80’s).

    1. Malaysian Airline Systems 747-236
    2. Swissair DC-10-30 (Quite Rare for Heathrow)
    3. Aeroflot IL-62
    4. BA 757-236
    5. Touraine Air Transport/Air France F.28-1000
    6. Swissair A310-220 (One of them “New Fangled” A310’s, well at the time anyway :p )

    in reply to: Gatwick Nostalgia (80's) #601245
    Pte1643
    Participant

    OOppss… the pic’s have come out in a different order to the text. :confused:

    in reply to: Gatwick Nostalgia (80's) #601254
    Pte1643
    Participant

    OK More from Gatwick (80’s)

    1. BA/Air Europe 757-236
    2. British Air Ferries Viscount 815
    3. British Cal’ DC-10-30 (Did anyone notice the “Cheeky” little Aviogenex Tu-134 in the background?)
    4. Continental DC-10-30
    5. Tower Air 747-130
    6. Virgin 747 (unsure of exact Mk)
    7. As #6
    8. World airways DC-10-30
    9. Wardair (Canada) DC-10-30
    10. Air Zimbabwe Cargo 707-330

    in reply to: Ugliest Aircraft. #1360809
    Pte1643
    Participant

    C’mon, the Beverley is actually not that bad…..

    I agree, I quite like the Beverley aswell.

    in reply to: Phantom XV490 #1360819
    Pte1643
    Participant

    Phantom tailplane

    Not “Tailplane” or “Elevators”.
    On F4’s they were known as “Stabilators”. :p

    Anyhoooooo…

    Just as a matter of interest…

    I work with a guy who was a “Flight Systems” tech on (RAF) F4’s.
    He said part of his job was to inspect/maintain some kit in the base of the Fin. Access to which had to be gained by standing (Not really allowed, but they used to do it anyway) on the “Stabilator”, the only problem was that it would move and you’d end up on the floor.
    He said that one of his Sqn mates invented this “Contraption” to steady the control surface, to stop it moving and keep you from actually standing on it while you did you job.
    IIRC I believe he said he was with 56 sqn (RAF) at the time.

    The RAF used to state that if anyone comes up with an idea to make the (any) job easier then they shall be credited and rewarded for their insight.
    He told me that his mates invention was so sucessful, that the entire RAF Phantom Sqn’s were using it in no time at all. 🙂

    All his mate recieved was a paultry £20 😮

    in reply to: Different angle of images at Manchester.. #604072
    Pte1643
    Participant

    Alitalia… Jeez… It’s about time they had a “Face Lift” surely.
    They’ve had that colour scheme Forever. :p

    in reply to: Spitfire X4410 #1364204
    Pte1643
    Participant

    1126 = Construction Number
    FF = First Flown
    MU = Maintenance Unit

    Thanks Paul.

    I got the lettered abbr’s, just couldn’t find the key to the number after the reg’.

    I’ve had this book for a “Couple a Three” years now, and was working on the fact the numbers were the construction number but couldn’t find the actual reference.

    Mark.

    Pte1643
    Participant

    Some good stuff here..but not a mention of the VC10. This is the most artistic arrangement of lines and curves to grace our skies – it radiates beauty at any angle and on finals with its talon like undercarriage hanging menacingly there is surely nothing to rival its sheer good looks.

    I can’t believe it. I was wading throught the posts thinking the very same, then, Like London Buses, you get 2 at once. 😀

    I grew up in West London under the glidepath for Heathrow 27L.
    You could always tell a VC-10 from miles away, because the viewing angle from the ground when coming into land made it look like it had Forward Canards.

    Stunning looking aircraft, better than ANYTHING produced today…!!!

    in reply to: Spitfire X4410 #1364334
    Pte1643
    Participant

    Jono’

    You may or may not have this info, but here it is anyway (Just in case)…

    http://www.cwgc.org/cwgcinternet/casualty_details.aspx?casualty=2436273

    Mark.

    in reply to: Spitfire X4410 #1364336
    Pte1643
    Participant

    There are numerous Spitfire experts on this board 😉

    Spitfire – The History will give you a brief bit of info regarding the aircraft. I can have a look for you if you want?

    Hope you don’t mind me “Jumping in”, but from above book…

    X4410 1126 FF 9-9-40, 24 MU 10-9-40, 72Sqn 17-9-40, Sht/Dwn by Bf109 nr Ashford kent, P/O Holland aban a/c kld 20-9-40.

    A quick question of my own, if I may…

    Could someone tell me what the “Code” numbers that appear in this book,directly AFTER the reg’ number represents (The 1126, in this case. I’ve not managed to work that one out yet)? :confused:

    Many Thanks in advance.

    Mark.

    in reply to: Which airline…??? #607722
    Pte1643
    Participant

    Id say 744

    I Agree.

    in reply to: Old pictures – Enjoy! #607840
    Pte1643
    Participant

    Old…!!! 😮

    They’re not Old.

    Here are some of the ones I took at gatwick, in about 1984.
    Now they’re OLD. 😀

    in reply to: Sunday Morning At Manchester #607910
    Pte1643
    Participant

    God, that 732 looks chubby!!

    Sure does…

    Which is the reason they used to be (Are they Still?) called “Flying Pigs”

    Just to add…

    There are some very talented photographers on this forum.

    in reply to: Fake or Genuine? #607938
    Pte1643
    Participant

    Along the same lines. 😮

    Sorry for the poor quality.

Viewing 15 posts - 226 through 240 (of 241 total)