dark light

Rodolfo

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 211 through 225 (of 1,190 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: Russian Navy News & Discussion, Part III #2007053
    Rodolfo
    Participant

    Buy the Ukrainia, refurnish all Kirovs…

    I don’t understand this hope to restore all those big cruisers. I think that will be horribly expensive. Better to let go the Slavas and concentrate resources on Kirovs.

    in reply to: Russian Space & Missile[ News/Discussion] Part- 4 #1798177
    Rodolfo
    Participant

    According to RIAN the caliber is 300 mm,… like Smerch rockets. I think unifying rockets calibers is right (scale and efficiency of production).

    I think Tornado-G is a lightened version of Smerch (to get air-transportation capability) with better accuracy, real-time targeting capability and enhanced range.

    in reply to: Russian Space & Missile[ News/Discussion] Part- 4 #1798183
    Rodolfo
    Participant
    in reply to: Replacing the F-15E #2366350
    Rodolfo
    Participant

    So far as I understand it the F-15E is not currently scheduled to be replaced in USAF service by the F-35A, which begs the question of what it will eventually be replaced by. As I see it the plausible possibilities are these:

    1. More F-35s
    2. Evolved F-35 (ala F-16 > F-16XL)
    3. F/A-XX/NGAD
    4. UCAVs

    5. Buy some Su-34 and the licence to produce them as Made in USA? :rolleyes:

    in reply to: Russian Space & Missile[ News/Discussion] Part- 4 #1798213
    Rodolfo
    Participant

    Nothing with certainty. Photos of last S-400 TELs seems to indicate that the 400 km missile may be a further evolution of the 48N6 family, like a sort of “48N6E4”. The little data available indicate that the mass of the “big missile” is around 2.000 kg vs 1850 kg for a 48N6E3. This give some weight to this hypothesis. I.e. a 2.000 kg missile can be accommodated in canisters like those witnessed a month ago.

    in reply to: Russian Space & Missile[ News/Discussion] Part- 4 #1798221
    Rodolfo
    Participant

    New long range missile for S 400 system. You can read in many S 400 articles about 40N6 missile. This missile have 400 km range and can intercept missiles ballistic missiles. Propably based on the 9M82M.

    http://warfare.ru/?linkid=1699&catid=264&topics=true&id=162

    I was ironic. There is no consensus on what a 40N6 is.

    48N6E3 has 250 km maximum range.

    Right. The 400 km range of missiles from last S-400 batteries deployed near Moscow is achievable with a missile very similar to the 48N6E3 with improved guidance systems launched on a lofted path.

    in reply to: Russian Space & Missile[ News/Discussion] Part- 4 #1798227
    Rodolfo
    Participant

    There is no way a low flying cruise missile (i.e. Tomahawk) pointed to Tula could be downed by an interceptor launched from Moscow. Earth curvature!!

    These slow low flying targets are can be downed just in a circle around just 50 km from the objective.

    So, that puzzles me is the apparent low priority given to integrate 9M96 missiles on S-400 batteries. These small missiles are much better suited to down Tomahawks than large 48N6E3 missiles

    I also agree, Moscow is overprotected respect to some important regiones that would need at least a battery to confront Cruise Missiles waves

    in reply to: Russian Space & Missile[ News/Discussion] Part- 4 #1798236
    Rodolfo
    Participant

    Moscow S 400 regiment is equipped 9M96 and 40N6 missile ?

    That’s the most extended question in the forum. 🙂

    9m96,… No yet.

    40N6? What’s a 40N6:confused:?

    If you refers to the 48N6E3 with better control and guidance systems to launch in lofted paths to reach targets at 400 km, the answer is… probably yes.

    If you refers to the hyper fast missile with a speed in the order of 3-4 km/s and able to hit targets over 150 km altitude, the answer is … Not. This is the weapon of choice for the S-500 system and will have a range around 600 km.

    So, the main S-400 weapon is a 48N6E3 missile with a 400 km range, 40 km altitude reach and 2-2.5 km/s speed.

    in reply to: Russian Aviation News – Part the Fourth #2367770
    Rodolfo
    Participant

    I mean changing the antenna for a PESA will much improve the radar performance.

    It is not neccesary to equip them with Irbis, but something like a Bars will be great.

    in reply to: Russian Aviation News – Part the Fourth #2367813
    Rodolfo
    Participant

    Still using stone-age radars? The twin cassegrain antenna is clearly the bottleneck of the system. Increasing processing power cannot do much more to improve the radar performance. 🙁

    in reply to: The PAK-FA Saga Episode XVI #2367976
    Rodolfo
    Participant

    My sympathy to you and your compatriots for the saddening tragic events that happened in Japan.
    Glad to see you back.

    100% agreed. 🙂

    in reply to: Russian Aviation News – Part the Fourth #2367988
    Rodolfo
    Participant

    Su-27SM3? :confused: What is this?

    in reply to: Russian Space & Missile[ News/Discussion] Part- 4 #1798271
    Rodolfo
    Participant
    in reply to: Russian Navy News & Discussion, Part III #2008166
    Rodolfo
    Participant

    Russian Navy will receive “up to ten” Yasen class subs until 2020:

    http://rian.ru/defense_safety/20110318/355149542.html

    The project is really going ahead. It’ll not end like the “Sea Wolf” as someone said.

    10 :eek::rolleyes:
    Is this number realistic?

    in reply to: Russian Navy News & Discussion, Part III #2008170
    Rodolfo
    Participant

    deleted

Viewing 15 posts - 211 through 225 (of 1,190 total)