AFAIK, Proton-M is a digitalized Proton that more efficiently burns the propellants and the new hardware/software works OK.
I agree with Austin. Failures seems located on the Briz-M upper stage and seems related to bad-quality issues.
I didn’t know Briz-M was related to the Angara program.:confused:
Rigth, but this is not related to Angara technology. Popovkim seems to be decided to take tough measures. Sooner or later these problems will, likely, be fixed.
Do you mean problems in the Soyus 2.1v?
Failures on Proton-M and Soyus 2.1b seems to be related more on quality issues. They are the latest iterations of well proven designs.
That’s rigth. 9M82M launched on ballistic paths can reach 400-450 km. Likely S-300V4 incorporate some S-400 electronics allowing to see and guide the missile to such a distances.
Yeap!
Some sources said that 40N6 top speed is 4km/s and max intercept alltitude is 185 km. It is much better parameters than 48N6 missile. I think it is brand new missile.
That’s the THAAD-like 58R6.
That is terrible logic, come on. Plenty of Russian programs have no photos for years into development.
Rigth. A few years ago there were no photos of the 53T6 in spite that the thing existes by more than 2 decades.
Taken from http://www.ausairpower.net/APA-NOTAM-230408-1.html
Biggest radio location system is 55Zh6-1 NEBO-UE. This radio locator shows target position in three coordinate system. Coverage is 500 km range, 40 km height and all-round [Ed: 360° mechanical antenna steering]. Detection ranges for a combat fighter flying at 10,000 m are 300 km and 20,000 m are 400 km; targets flying at 500 m can be found at least 65 km. Radio locator also very accurate: 500 m in range, 850 m in height and half degree in azimuth. So, can link with new S-400 Triumf [Ed: SA-21 Growler] system, send big 48N6DM missile 400 km. Smart enough to guide missile to kill box so target not know it has company coming.
I know, the credibility level is low, but…
AFAIK, there were many problems with the control on the exo-atmospheric phase and a delay with the active seeker production. Anyway, state tests of such a missile ended last year.
More likely 40N6 is the 48N6DM with an active seeker and retractable fins to better travel the midcourse phase of a parabolic long-range shot.
May be the last battery with the “short range” 48N6DM was delivered to the far east but the coming ones will include the long awaited 40N6.
Anyway, the key of this new interceptor is the active seeker.
Although from past statement it is known that its range will be 450 Km and Altitude 185 Km.
That’s the 58R6 missile.
State tests of the 400 km long range missiles ended the last year. Probably the next batches will have it.
Anyway, is that a big deal? Shots to such distances will just target high flying low-maneuvering targets (AWACS, tankers and so on).
S-400 still use modyfied missiles from S-300 48N6. So S-400 hasn’t range 400 km but only 250 km.
Are you sure? The article doesn’t claim that.
A S-400 regiment in the far east