Missiles interception, the Russian way:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AOz7f182Pc4
Three coordinated blasts in a rapid sequence.
Most of the modern RV are small all carbon carbon composite type with multi-directional ablative carbon-carbon re-entry nose tip making it light , tough and peel off like banana skin during rentry , reducing thermal stress and maintain high speed ( without significant degradation compared to its reentry speed ) , so the point is not very valid now compared to 60 , 70 maragning steel type simple RV
That’s what I mean when a label warheads as “heavy”. Heavy means a big ballistic coefficient rather than a “very dense” warhead. In fact a warhead can be “light” in the physical sense and “heavy” because has a big ballistic coefficient.
Yet they claim that S-400 can intercept a 3,500 km IRBM which nicely overlaps with THAAD performance parameters , happy lucky coincidence.
It can but in an endo-atmospheric mode. A la Patriot, just like S-300PM1/PM. See Sean’s blog. The reach in antiballistic mode is 60 km (not 400 km). It not works in a “shot-look-shot” mode but in a “shot-shot-pray” mode. As Scott told us Sprint can intercept ICBM at even lower altitudes.
The BIG Missile is a huge one and a twin stage missile , people tend to generalize the S-400 interceptor and bracket the 9M96E/E2 with the big missile , the big missile was still in development even in late stage and its real data is classified ,
The former is the real IRBM killer , while the latter is more of a Patriot’ski type ( it got the name because of its HTK capability like PAC-3 ) although its max altitude of E2 is twice that of patriot.
The BIG Missile is not a twin stage missile. Is from the 48N6 lineage but larger. It may be just the 48N6E3. Certainly is larger than 48N6E2 (some sources cite a 2.200 kg mass) but in packed in usual S-300 canisters. Its main mission is to kill valuable non-maneuverable targets at distances up to 400 km.
The twin stage missile might be the on on development for the S-500 with some ASAT potential.
Its a pity that S-400 are being compared to Patriot system when infact they are new 4th Gen SAM. The performance figures viz a viz Patriot were met by many interceptors of S-300 series and in many case were coolly surpassed.
Russians never compared S-400 with THAAD They did it with Patriot systems and certainly surpasses it in many parameters but it is not an exo-atmospheric interceptor (I.e. THAAD).
But with IRBM with a reentry speed of ~ 4.5 – 5 km/sec or ~ ( M 14 – M 16 ) , there is hardly any time to analyse and fire your 3 – 4 shot , so essentially if you miss hitting between 30 – 40 km , then there is no second chance.
You are missing the key issue. Once in the atmosphere, the warheads has lower speed and that speed depends more on the ballistic coefficient than on the exo-atmospheric speed. Once below 30 km altitude the warhead travels around 2 km/s irrespectively of the previous path. The “heavier” warhead can “brake” later but it will be braked anyway.
Furthermore, Russians never claimed S-400 is in the THAAD leage. They always compared S-400 with Patriot systems. In the other hand they compared S-500 with the THAAD. That’s logical since 48N6 (and likely 40N6) maneuvre on an aerodynamic basis. You can’t steer them whitout air.
I thought the THAAD radar looked huge until I discovered that wasn’t a standard sized 18-wheeler trailer it was on.
Scott, you know the Russians LOVE big things. MARS will certainly be big. I.e. Gamma-DE has a 8 m * 5.2 m aperture. If MARS comprises two coupled GAMMA-DE, this may imply a 16 m * 5.2 m aperture. 😮
If S-400 can intercept a IRBM class missile corresponding to a range of 3,500 km then it is a THAAD class missile as that is what THAAD is capable of intercepting.
The 9M96E/E1 are more in the class of Aster-15/30 but with a HTK capability and a lower average speed of ~ M 3.0
Yes, in the sense that’s able to attack warheads from IRBM with ranges up to 3.000 km (4.8 km/s) and no in the sense that it is a exo-atmospheric interceptor. It is an endo one.
Hence the S-400 altitude limitation of ~ 40 km does not makes sense , as at that altitude it will hardly gets a chance of 1 hit at a target , the kill window is just too narrow at that altitude and it does not fit into its 3,500 km kill target.
I read some time back the big missile has a max altitude of interception of ~ 175 km and range of 400km , makes perfect sense for 3,500 km interception with larger kill box and multiple shot opportunity , as capable as THAAD.
So either they a lying about the IRBM interception capability of S-400 ( 3,500 km ) or the interception altitude of ~ 175 km i read is the correct value.
But THAAD works in a shot-look-shot mode. S-400 launches (at least) two missiles per target to minimize the miss-likelihood in the kill window .
Eyy, there is YouTube a video showing a S-300V interception of a ballistic target. The system launched three missiles that exploded at a rapid sequence on a sort “blasts column” that was “pierced” by the target. Quite impressive coordination.
I believe the 175 km altitude interception corresponds to the S-500 missiles. This one can also do ASAT jobs.
It seems huge :diablo: Looks like two Gamma-DE placed on a big truck. I knew some time ago in the net all S-500 radars will be AESA.
On the reach of the S-400 system. Taken from an official system presentation with a speech from Mr. Ivanov.
http://img691.imageshack.us/i/s400.pdf/
No THAAD like system. S-400 is a sort of “hyper-Patriot PAC-2”. With 9M96 missiles will be a “hyper-Patriot PAC-2 & PAC-3” system.
Obviously the quote do not know what they are talking about , just the usual cut and paste type.
You cannot have a GBI with ASAT capability and yet have no ICBM interception capability , as a GBI that can intercept LEO satellite can equally intercept a ICBM warhead as they have nearly same velocity , LEO being on slightly higher side of orbital velocity
RIAN also quoted a target speed of up to 5 km/s. If we translate this to minimum energy ballistic paths, it means a trajectory of 3.500 km. I assumed the “5 km/s” referred to max warhead speed in the same way the Antey-2500 can attack targets with speed of up to 4.5 km/s (2.500 km) and the S-400 targets with speed of up to 4.8 km/s (3.000 km).
To do an ASAT job the system will need data from the LPAR network. S-500 likely will not be able to do it based on its own radars and battle management systems.
Intercepting ICBM is a capability of interceptor and networked radar , one needs a capable interceptor and an equally capable network of Radar to do the job.
So integrating even the BIG S-400 missile with a anti-ICBM MFCR and networked radar will not be able to do the job ,they need the right interceptor for the task.
Yes and no. If you have perfect information on the target from the launch time you are able to predict the impact point and you will not need a superb missile. You will just need to place a metal fragment in the right place at the right time. Off- course the real word is far from this scenario, but expanding the “information envelope” allows you to use less capable missiles. In fact the superior antiballistic capability of the S-400 over the S-300VM can be explained by the superior Radars, in spite the fact that 9M82M is a superior ABM missile respect to the S-400 missiles.
The S-400 is more in THAAD league , specially the Big Missile with a range of ~ 400 km and altitude of interception greater than 150 km.
The S-500 is in a different league and is an anti-ICBM/ASAT system
The “Big Missile” or “40N6” is a 48N6 missile on steroids with weight around 2.200 kg and placed in the classical S-300P canisters. Its range of 400 km is achieved via a lofted trajectory of around 70 km altitude to descend to non-maneuverable targets at such a range. It can’t maneuver (so it can’t intercept) outside the atmosphere. See Sean’s blog. The 150 km interception altitude 4 km/s speed seems as an urban legend that I believed some time ago but the Big Missile is just from the 48N6 family with a speed in the 2.1-2.5 km/s range. Nothing to despise, off course but no an exo-atmospheric weapon. This exo-atmospheric weapon will be the one of the S-500 system.
A video on the Meteorit. Seems interesting. Unfortunately in Russian.
New bytes of information on the A-135. Nothing to exclaim “wow” but info on a few new data.
System A-135 includes several functional layers
1- early warning satellites constallation,- detects ICBM launch events
2- Automatic Data Network of early warning radars and data processing centers (Daryal-U, Pechora and latest Voronezh)detecting range up to 6 000 km)http://www.rti-mints.ru/gallery/darial/ph004.jpghttp://www.rti-mints.ru/img/voroneg.jpg
3- Multipurpose radar facility, central automated engagement computing system (Don-2N) and missile launch pads 7 active around Moscow.http://www.army.lv/photos/3633.jpghttp://www.arms.ru/rko/Images/don2n13.jpg
4- Space control system (detects, recognizes and catalogue space objects on earth orbits on distances up to 40 000 km similar to GEODSS)-– optical- electronic detection system “Okno”- (window) and “Krona ” (crone) – also kind of “very early warning” system- in case of nuclear strike preparation some of satellites could start change orbit parameters to improve coverage of Russian territory.http://www.astronomer.ru/data/images/5/000591-2.jpghttp://www.novosti-kosmonavtiki.ru/c…8/P1010009.jpg
Some features of System N20 Don-2N (PILL BOX) and battle management facility:
– designed to survive in case of nuclear attack- completely autonomous system with deep underground operation support system, maintenance facilities, energy and life-support systems.
-able to recognize and track up to 120 BM warheads simultaneously with engagement 69 of them.
-able to track space objects on orbits up to 40 000 km
– Maximum impulse power of phase array up to 250 MWt
– Targeting and tracking data precision- +- 10 m on distance 360 км
Now it operational and under modernisation (new supercomputer and software)Antimissiles
53Т6 (modernized)- short range (200 km distance, 80 altitude) have 2 types of wareheads- nuclear 10 kt with soft- roentgen spectrum and conventional – same type like on s-300 missiles.
51Т6 – long range (up to 400 km range,150 altitude) 1mt nuclearSince 1989 conducted 395 tests of atimisiles in Sary-Shagan(Kazahstan) test site
including last two of modernised missiles http://russianforces.org/blog/2007/1…_test_in.shtml
Conducted 1500 BM tracking and interception tests, including interception of MRBM coming from Kapustin-yar launch pad in North-West Russia and ICBM from DELTA class submarine.http://kursakov.narod.ru/a135.htm
Like the W66 warhead on the Sprint missile …
Thst’s rigth; and even below 1 kT.
Do you know the status and mission of the nuclear 5V55R missile.?
For ABM purposes, the best EMP warhead is a nuclear one.:diablo: Off course very low yield and as clean as possible.
In this way, I wonder what’s the purpose of the nuclear 5V55R missile.
AFAIK, EMP warheads just in the Iskander. May be Trident can inform us better.
Or maybe they go for HPM
What’s HPM?
Upgrade to the S-300V? Finally admitting that the “anti-aircraft missile” system is really an ABM system?
S-300V was an ABM from scratch. It has a powerful anti-aircraft capability but was designed to confront the Pershing and Pershing-II threat. Ironically, it acquired full operative capability in 1988, that’s 1 year after the signing of the INF.
If S-500 can intercept ( ASAT ) at LEO with a orbit velocity of 7.2 Km/s then it can well intercept ICBM and that would be a logical capability for S-500 to have.
Not an anti-ICBM. According to reference [1], just an anti-IRBM”
The S-500 is a new generation surface-to-air missile system, designed for intercepting short- and intermediate-range ballistic missiles with ranges up to 3,500 km and for defense against Airborne Early Warning and Control, Airborne Warning and Control System and jamming aircraft. It is an upgraded version of the S-400 SA-20 Triumf. The S-500 will be able to destroy ballistic supersonic targets flying at a speed of 5 km/s.
It can not intercept warheads from ICBM by their own capability. It might intercept warheads from ICBM if networked with the LPARs & Don-2NP network. That’s where Samoderzhets system may start to play.
The Russian equivalent of THAAD is the S-400 (40N6) “big missile” , The Big Missile and US THAAD systems are capable of intercepting a 3,500 km range IRBM.
AFAIK, 40N6, if exists, is aimed at attacking aerial target at distances up to 400 km. In may intercept ballistic targets at altitudes up to 40 km (according to data from a You-tube video –in Russian-, where Ivanov presented the system). No THAAD. S-500 will be the THAADsky.
They still have a long way to go , before they start series production of 4th Gen SSN , probably will take a decade from now to get the 4th Gen SSN in small Numbers.
The USN is far ahead in the race and have produced 2 new 4th Gen SSN , Sea Wolf and the series production Virginia and are churning the latter in numbers.
The Russians are playing a catch up game here.
The Russians are not in economical position to race with the US-navy on number of submarines. Cold War lessons were learned in the hard way in Russia. On the other hand Bush Jr. apparently was unable to learn and the American over-spending is now obvious.
Apparently the Russian Navy doctrine is much modest: to deny NATO the Barents Sea and to sneak some SSN to the Atlantic in order to lurk and disrupt. In the Pacific the task is quite similar. So the number of SSN is more in line with Russian economic realities. Anyway its nuclear fleet is/will be by far the largest after the American one.