dark light

Rodolfo

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 631 through 645 (of 1,190 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: Russian Navy News & Discussion Thread Part II #2033110
    Rodolfo
    Participant

    The Russian Navy as a money black-hole?

    http://en.rian.ru/mlitary_news/20090603/155156475.html

    in reply to: Russian Space & Missile[ News/Discussion] Part-3 #1815876
    Rodolfo
    Participant

    That might be the “40N6” and not the 9M96.

    May be. May be not. I have some doubts on the existence of such a missile (40N6).
    Integrating the small missiles onto the S-400 makes more sense.

    in reply to: Russian Space & Missile[ News/Discussion] Part-3 #1815882
    Rodolfo
    Participant

    An old RIAN article seems to indicate that 9M96 missiles are tested on the S-400 system:

    http://en.rian.ru/russia/20081226/119183668.html

    Furthermore, the crisis didn’t hit the defense production:

    http://en.rian.ru/russia/20090602/155148607.html

    in reply to: North Korea tested nuclear bomb ,again. #1815900
    Rodolfo
    Participant

    May be is time to ask China to get the backyard in order. I don’t think S. Korea, USA, Japan or Russia are able to influence the “Dear Leader”.

    in reply to: Legitimacy of DPRK nuclear threat #2475160
    Rodolfo
    Participant

    South Korea has a very big tech advantage over the North but it has a very weak point: Seul is near the DMZ. So if Kim decide, he will made this city a “sea of fire”. South Koreans know this.

    in reply to: Russian Space & Missile[ News/Discussion] Part-3 #1816121
    Rodolfo
    Participant

    They are, but they have huge errors in range, azimuth and elevation ranges. The solution is that they can cue second radar with higher frequency in the direction of the threat or missile with either IR or good active-radar homing head.

    Well, that’s the key. According Kopp, not only different radars can be networked, but also last Russian developments greatly narrowed the threat volume. So, a missile shot guided by the VHF radar may soon be feasible.

    in reply to: Russian Space & Missile[ News/Discussion] Part-3 #1816143
    Rodolfo
    Participant

    Are these VHF radars as usefull againtst stealth palnes as Mr. Kopp claims? If the answer id “yes”, the end of the stealth age is coming.

    in reply to: Russian Space & Missile[ News/Discussion] Part-3 #1816168
    Rodolfo
    Participant

    I think the safer answer is … NO.

    in reply to: Russian Space & Missile[ News/Discussion] Part-3 #1816191
    Rodolfo
    Participant

    Does this mean that if the Russian army deployed somewhere and felt they needed some serious air defense, the S-300V would provide it to troops in the field? Was this system used in Georgia/South Ossetia? IIRC SA-17s were deployed with Russian ground forces there, was that the longest ranged system?

    I think deploying a S-300V to face the threat of the Georgian aviation is a sort of “overkill”. With Buk systems should be more than enough. The S-300V was designed to confront heavy NATO air-raids. Obviously Georgia can not mount such king of air-raids.

    By the way, I don’t know what will happen with the S-300V family and may be it is in a dead path. Note that only one improvement cycle was achieved (from S-300V to S-300VM). Then, compare whit the numerous improvements of the S-300P family (from the initial static system to the heavily modified and enhanced S-400 system).

    May be the lack of sales success combined with the high cost of the S-300V/VM killed this awesome system. We should wait and see.

    in reply to: 53T6 “Gazelle” revisited #1816194
    Rodolfo
    Participant

    Except that 4km/sec is not it’s AVERAGE speed.

    With so short and variable flight times (from 10s to 30 s) I am not sure if the average speed is so important. It will mostly depend on the interception altitude. I will assume the terminal speed is around 4.5 km/s after booster separation (5-6 s fligth time).

    Also, Sprint was operationally deployed it’s just not anymore.

    I think Sprint working altitude is lower than the Gazelle working altitude. So Sprint have a bigger initial acceleration in the first few seconds and Gazelle later. My “eye-measurement” device 😀 suggests this. Look both videos. It seems that Sprint is quicker and Gazzelle is faster.

    in reply to: 53T6 “Gazelle” revisited #1816196
    Rodolfo
    Participant

    I sure wish more details would come out on that thing. There is some decent info available on Sprint and Hibex but virtually nothing on Gazelle.

    I 100% agree.

    I mean we don’t even know exactly how big and heavy it is.

    From several sources:

    Weight: 10.000 kg.
    Length: 10 m.
    Base Diameter: 2 m
    Warhead: 150 kg or slightly larger.

    in reply to: 53T6 “Gazelle” revisited #1816222
    Rodolfo
    Participant

    AVERAGE speed. Maximum speed is not average speed.

    Yeap; you are rigth. So, my bet in that top-speed lies in de 4-5 km/s interval. With so high accelerations, the average speed will depend on the overall flight time.

    in reply to: 53T6 “Gazelle” revisited #1816228
    Rodolfo
    Participant

    What is the average speed of Gazelle ?

    There are various claims ranking from 4 km/s to 5.5 km/s. I bet it is near the lower value. May be it is around 4.5 km/s.

    in reply to: North Korea tested nuclear bomb ,again. #1816288
    Rodolfo
    Participant

    Actually i think the idea is inspired by James Bond, and those are good movies

    Well, James Bond is far better. Women are alway awesome in the saga. :eek::D

    in reply to: North Korea tested nuclear bomb ,again. #1816335
    Rodolfo
    Participant

    Originally Posted by Arkali106

    North Korea doesn’t exactly strike me as the most secure or stable country. Special forces could bribe NK guards with food if they want to secure the nukes.

    A military-geopolitical operation with nuclear forces involved…depending on a bribe. ????? :confused:

    Too much class B American movies. :rolleyes:

Viewing 15 posts - 631 through 645 (of 1,190 total)