dark light

Rodolfo

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 1,141 through 1,155 (of 1,190 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: Chinese ASAT test #1803443
    Rodolfo
    Participant

    I assumed the opposite hypothesis. Sorry :confused: . Anyway, have the ruskies some remaining ASAT capability?

    in reply to: Russian ABM test. #1803889
    Rodolfo
    Participant

    So 40N6 have a 400 km range and 185 km altitude? This is of course designed with BM in mind. FAS claims that S-500 (Autocrat?) will have capabilities to down targets with ranges exceeding 3.500 km. It seems that the “strategic threshold (5.500 km)” is near to be reached.

    in reply to: Russian ABM test. #1803913
    Rodolfo
    Participant

    Sferrin, an interception of a cruise drone was included in the following video (around the second minute of the clip).

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HPdPKkZS6Pk

    The “killer” hit the drone from upwards, so I assumed it was a S-300 rocket, since it is her “trademark” for killing a cruise missile.
    Nothing about killing a Scud (yet)

    The video is very cool.

    in reply to: Russian ABM test. #1803933
    Rodolfo
    Participant

    Being objective, it must be reckoned that THAAD have advantages in term of range and height, and probably in terms of data-processing speed.
    On the other hand, improved S-400 looks impressive. Three missile types (perhaps 9M96, 48N6DM and 40N6), all tailored to accomplish a wide range of missions.

    It looks that finally 40N6 will be commissioned around 2008.

    in reply to: Russian ABM test. #1803971
    Rodolfo
    Participant

    Another old article that may be of interest in this thread:

    Plans to re-arm the air force surface-to-air missile (SAM) units with the S-400 remain highly dependent on the availability of funds, and the manufacturing capacities of the industry, according to RFAF officials,.

    Colonel General Boris Cheltsov, RFAF chief of staff, said the S-400 would achieve full operational readiness in 2005 after receiving a number of upgrades. Gen Bizhev also confirmed that the upgrades would allow the S-400 and the A-135M to share target data information.

    Together with upgraded variants of the in-service SAM systems, the S-400 is part of an effort to “solve the issues of non-strategic missile defence”. Gen Cheltsov, who headed the air force commission that supervised S-400 fire trials, said the commission has recommended to the Russian Ministry of Defence (MoD) that it accepts the S-400 in service “in a variant with a standard missile”. Earlier it had been recommended that the S-400 enter trial service with missiles already used by the S-300 series.

    Gen Bizhev said the S-400 would initially be located to protect Moscow, St Petersburg and the Urals industrial region, as well as border stretches “where missile attacks can be expected”. He also said the S-400 could destroy cruise missiles and aircraft at a range of 250 km and at a range of heights from several dozen metres to the stratosphere.

    The S-400, when operational with the new long-range missile (40N6), is claimed to have a range of 400 km and it is believed to have passed firing tests with all missile types.

    The existing S-400s are currently undergoing capability enhancements for interoperability with the space forces assets.

    The Russian armed forces say that the S-400 can potentially be used against strategic ballistic missiles after separation of warheads. In that role the S-400s will be co-operating with the A-135 anti-missile system in service with the Russian Space Forces. Provision is made for the S-400s to receive targeting information on approaching space threats from the Russian Space Forces in an automatic mode.

    The S-400/A-135 will be the first block of the Air and Space Defence (ASD) system, a future structure concept recently formulated by the Russian defence ministry. The latter said that the MoD has recently approved the ASD concept and it is currently being improved for final validation by the Russian president.

    Among other things, the ASD calls for a unitary radar field over Russia, similar to that which the Soviet Union had, but “on a new quality level”. To achieve this, a united air traffic control/air-defence radar field will be created, combining the means of civil and military structures. Almaz-Antei (Air Defence Concern or Kontsern PVO) has been selected to lead the effort. Almaz-Antei will act as systems integrator and also supplier of major elements such as phased-array radar systems and ‘identification friend or foe’ interrogators.

    in reply to: Russian ABM test. #1804004
    Rodolfo
    Participant

    THis is the article. It’s translated via on-line traductors. So the English is bad.

    “Favorite” modernized

    NPO “Diamond” has finished the first stage of state tests of antiaircraft rocket system (ZRS) “Favorite” (the first stage of modernization ZRK N-300) that has raised fighting opportunities of the domestic antiaircraft rocket weapon on reflection of impacts of cruise missiles and not strategic ballistic missiles, and also the purposes executed with application of a complex of actions, unmasking factors reducing a level (so-called technology “Stealth”). ” The military-industrial courier ” has informed On it general designer NPO “Diamond” Alexander Lemansky in published today interview to a weekly journal.

    According to Lemanskogo, main feature ZRS “Favorite” – consists that the system provides physical destruction of the ballistic purpose on a trajectory of flight due to initiation of undermining of fighting loading of the purpose. ” This effect, – has noted A.Lemansky, – is reached due to application of specialized algorithms of prompting of rockets on the ballistic purposes and modernizations of fighting equipment of anti-aircraft missiles “.

    In opinion Lemanskogo, the new step in development of means of antimissile defense will be connected with introduction of the high-speed high-altitude rockets, capable to amaze the purpose at heights over 100 km, and also perspective RLS, equipped at heights more than 100 km and significant distance from defended object it is necessary to amaze with the active phased antenna lattices and the newest computing means ballistic missiles of average range which are started since a boundary in 3 – 3,5 thousand in km, Alexander Lemansky considers.

    25.05.2005 ITAR-TASS

    in reply to: Russian ABM test. #1804006
    Rodolfo
    Participant

    I very agree with you Austin. Some time ago appeared an article claiming that improvements are to be introduced in S-400 missiles. Such improvements would allow interceptions at near 60 km height. I will search it.

    in reply to: Russian ABM test. #1804031
    Rodolfo
    Participant

    Some data and pictures available on the 40N6“mystery missile”?
    We just know 400 km range. No speed, no mass, no dimensions. 😡

    in reply to: Video of SM-3 Block II KV #1804168
    Rodolfo
    Participant

    These number are really awesome 😮 , most considering that SM-3 weigth is just around 1.5 ton.The KV should be pretty ligth.

    It looks no far from be able to down ICBM warheads coming at speeds of 6+ km/s.

    in reply to: Russian ABM test. #1804170
    Rodolfo
    Participant

    Respect to the ABM capabilities of the S-400, not very much is known. Just that supposedly can intercept warheads coming from ballistic ranges of 3.500 km (top speed 4.8 km/s). I don’t know if this is done with the 9M96 missile or with the 48N6DM.
    The 40N6 “mystery missile” seems to be in endless tests. I don’t know interception range and heights.

    More data are known about the S-300VM. The interception ceiling was increased to 30.000 m from the 25.000 m of the S-300V and the range remains in 40.000 m. May be this explain the small top-speed increase. Target with speeds of up to 4.5 km/s (2.500 km) may be intercepted.

    That’s all I know.

    in reply to: Video of SM-3 Block II KV #1804212
    Rodolfo
    Participant

    Cool!! May yoy specify technical data of SM-3?
    Thanks

    in reply to: Russian ABM test. #1804236
    Rodolfo
    Participant

    They carry a heavier warhead further so it would be surprising if they weren’t heavier.

    Sferrin, I mean they are “more dense”. Look at the 9M82 dimensions. It’s slightly taller but slimmer than the Sprint. Nevertheless it’s a ton heavier. May be American propellants are more advanced, and then lighter. In spite of this, 9M82 looks as a pretty fast “missile hunting” animal.

    in reply to: Russian ABM test. #1804266
    Rodolfo
    Participant

    The night picture is really nice pesho!

    A curious issue. Russian ABM missiles seems to be considerably heavier than the awesome Sprint. I.e compare the above Sprint specifications with the ones of the 53T6 and those of Giant (9M82) and Giant-M (9M82M):

    Manufacturer: Antey NPO/EMKB Novator.
    Total Length: 10.00 m
    Core Diameter: 0.85 m.
    Total Mass: 4600 kg.
    Standard warhead mass: 150 kg.

    Maximum range: Anti-air mode
    9M82: 100 km.
    9M82M: 200 km.

    Anti-ballistic mode
    9M82: 40 km.
    9M82M: 40 km.

    Maximum speed:
    9M82: 2.4 km/s.
    9M82M: 2.7 km/s.
    Ceiling: 30,000 m.
    Floor: 25 m.

    http://www.military.cz/russia/sam/s300v/9M82.JPG

    in reply to: Russian ABM test. #1804542
    Rodolfo
    Participant

    Sorry about the confusions. :confused:

    The S-225 turned out to be a f__king interesting concept for the current Russian realities (growing instabilities from south plus the always present pressure from west plus the giant china waking-up plus a constrained military budget).
    I want to ask to expert members like SOC or Sferrin about the possibility of developing a similar concept via an S-300VM “on steroids”. Perhaps, deploying a few 53T6 in mobile launchers and/or updating 9M82M, modernizing and enlarging tracking radars, all of this networked with the Don-2NP.
    Is this feasible or not?

    in reply to: Russian Space & Missile [ News/Discussion] #1804559
    Rodolfo
    Participant
Viewing 15 posts - 1,141 through 1,155 (of 1,190 total)