Sad! 🙁
According Podvig, it might be another upgrading iteration for the Topol-M ICBM family.
http://russianforces.org/blog/2011/09/what_was_the_icbm_that_crashed.shtml
Predictably, he is screaming and very upset because of R & D activities on strategic deterrence.
It supposedly was an experimental bus, but the “operational” MIRV bus was tested just twice. That’s strange. :confused:
Are you sure?
On the A-135 follow on
http://military.tomsk.ru/blog/index-389.html
On the S-500
http://military.tomsk.ru/blog/topic-373.html
According to an article at that site S-500 may use the 45T6, that’s the
53T6 follow on to perform anti-ICBM tasks.
So the future ABM umbrella will consist in the fixed A-235 system plus some mobile S-500 systems.
Nice animation
Supposedly, there is a program to de-nuke 53T6 by replacing the 10 KT warhead by a conventional fragmentation warhead. This one is something like the 9M82 warhead on steroids. Anyway, the status of the program is unknown and I have doubts about the kill-radio of that conventional warhead.
If this program is successfully carried out, it should eliminate the nuclear fall-out problem, but I think at a reduced kill-probability. The information available on the number of deployed 53T6 and type of used warhead is very scant and contradictory.
Actually the maximum reported speed for the 53T6 is around 4 km/s (Mach 14) and the maximum reported acceleration around 200 g, but may be you are right: considering an average Mach 5 speed and a burnout time of 4 secs, this “interception” should be carried out in the 5-6 km altitude range. And that’s enough to avoid the damage of a hard high-value target. You know, it is better to absorb a 10 KT “friendly” detonation 5 km away than a 100-200 KT enemy denotation originated 1 km away from you.
Remember, A-135 was not designed to protect the soft Moscow urban area. It was designed to protect high value targets to give time enough to unleash a Doomsday retaliation.
Trident you are a god.
But seriously, good eyes.
Trident = Hawkeye 🙂
It is really impressive the “dog-leg” maneuver (at an estimated speed over 3 km/s). It seems as a maneuver to intercept a vertically diving warhead from above.
Do someone know it was an interception of a real dummy-warhead or just a test to put the interceptor on the right place at the right time?
Bulava 😮
Yury will go to the Pacific
I expected, while trading payload by range, a reach well over 10.000 km like the Trident-II reach. Anyway, that’s OK to hit practically any place in the Northern hemisphere. As far I know, Russia doesn’t have targets in South America and/or Australia.
On the other hand a payload like 1500 kg will need a 50% weight increase. Out of question.
According to Russiaspaceweb
2011 Aug. 27: At 07:20 Moscow Time, the Bulava missile lifted off from the Yuri Dolgoruky submarine stationed in the submerged position in the White Sea and 33 minutes later its warheads successfully impacted in the Pacific Ocean, some 9,300 kilometers from the launch site, demonstrating maximum range of the new weapon, representatives of the Russian Navy announced. It was the 16th flight of the missile.
9300 km is far less than the 12500 km demonstrated by Sineva two years ago. 😮
Great! What will happen with the Dmitry Donskoy?
From RIAN. S-500 going to Moscow after 2015.
Russia will deploy new S-500 air defense systems around Moscow after 2015, a leading Russian aerospace defense chief said on Monday.
“This deadline is set in a contract with the Defense Ministry. The project is currently at the engineering design stage,” former Almaz-Antei corporation chief designer Igor Ashurbeili said in an exclusive interview with RIA Novosti.
Almaz Antei is Russia’s main producer of medium and long-range air defense missile systems, and its S-300 and S-400 systems are among the most capable in the world, with the ability to intercept theater-range ballistic missiles as well as aircraft and cruise missiles.
S-500 will not be self-propelled like its predecessors S-300 and S-400, but towed, due to its large size and heavy weight.“But it should be mobile in order to protect not only Moscow, but also any threatened region [in Russia],” Ashurbeili said.
“The current A-35 anti-ballistic missile [ABM] network around Moscow was built in the early 1970s and is largely obsolete now,” he said.
Ashurbeili said one type of interceptor missile currently in service is practically not serviceable, while the other “has warheads stored separately from their carriers.”
Moscow’s existing missile shield was of limited size and was not updated due to the constraints of the Anti-Ballistic Missile Treaty signed with the United States in the 1970s.
The United States abrogated the treaty during President George W Bush’s presidency.
Russia has expressed concern over NATO’s plans for a missile defense shield for Europe, claiming it undermines Russia’s own nuclear deterrent.
Taran System: A 1960s NMD project