dark light

Dog House Ldr.

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 286 through 300 (of 302 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: Newbie to the forum + next Saturday news. #1420159
    Dog House Ldr.
    Participant

    Welcome Quinny to the forum, as I am new as well I am Doghouse Ldr. and are from the States if you have any questions for me regarding any airplane on my side of the pond just pm me. 🙂

    in reply to: Sky Captain and the World of Tomorrow #1420164
    Dog House Ldr.
    Participant

    If you want some P-40 action I suggest watching 1941. It had the best collection of comedy actors with John Belushi playing Capt. Wild Bill Kelso, trying to find the secret Jap airbase in the Pomona Alfalfa fields. 😎

    in reply to: Lincoln restoration? #1420168
    Dog House Ldr.
    Participant

    That sad to hear, I really get excited when I hear someone is restoring a more exotic bomber, rather than a B-17, or a Lancaster, not putting down there war time attributes, but I look for more variety now these days. 🙁

    in reply to: "Hello Rabbit Leader…" #1424252
    Dog House Ldr.
    Participant

    the germans at there retreat with the high ranking one aying Dover?, Dover….., and at the beginning of the movie when Kurt Jurgens comes to see the British Ambassador and tells him that they should surrender or be crushed by Germany, and that England was theirs for the taking, the British Ambassador tells his wife that they are running on Liquid Courage.

    in reply to: What Film would you like to see made ? #1436748
    Dog House Ldr.
    Participant

    How about a film in North Africa, say RAF and its Commonwealth Squadrons against the famed JG27, or a better remake of Command Decision, or 12 ‘O’ Clock High would be nice.

    in reply to: Whose Heritage? What Takes Priority? SCRAP Sally B today #1557572
    Dog House Ldr.
    Participant

    I think the real deal for me is this: the people who lived in England during the war want american and british warbirds over the English skies. Many young British, Commonwealth, and American flight crews gave up there lives in order the world could live free. To say that a P-51 is polluting the skies is rubbish, What would you rather have, an American fighter or bomber, or none at all. I wish the American people in general had as much passion for their avaition history as you all do. We can’t even get a sizable donation for our own avaition museum here, becuase no one cares about Consolitdated plants contribution to the war. So in essence the more the better! 😡

    in reply to: Twin-engined Fighters: Quiz time! #1557584
    Dog House Ldr.
    Participant

    Is that color picture of the Russian twin engine a Petlaykov Pe-3? :confused:

    in reply to: Night Fighter Sqdn. #1557591
    Dog House Ldr.
    Participant

    Thanks stormbird262 very interesting info and greatly appreciated. I have not been MIA just enjoying the early autumn breeze in the lonestar state. Although No. 87 sqdn. was not as famous as some of the other sqdns., it looks to me as it played an important role during the early years of the war.

    😎

    in reply to: Goodwood Revival Aircraft Pictures #1561795
    Dog House Ldr.
    Participant

    Didn’t speed tv commentator Alan de Cadenet used to fly his own spit in for the festival?

    in reply to: Night Fighter Sqdn. #1561802
    Dog House Ldr.
    Participant

    Hi all, thanks for the pics. I’m just looking for some additional background, i.e. when did the units form, combat history, lineage of aircraft in the squadrons,combat record kills vs. losses, just a bit more to info., just in case someone at the contest ask me a question about the paint scheme and markings.

    in reply to: USAF tankers #2655739
    Dog House Ldr.
    Participant

    I don’t see the USAF going outside of the U.S. to buy tankers form Airbus.

    in reply to: The next FB-111? Or the next Tu-160? #2656023
    Dog House Ldr.
    Participant

    Back when the original B-1A was still being developed, the air force toyed with the idea of stretching the F-111 to a crew of four, that plan fizzled. I believe that the air force needs to build a bomber in between the size of say the B-1 and the smaller F-111.

    Several years ago they had this bomber it was the B-58 HUSTLER. It was fast, could out run most fighters of that era, could deliver a nuclear load, very sophisticated for its time, but it did have problems structural reliability, avionics were very shady.

    But if I were going to build a bomber this is probably the criteria it needs., fast, stealth, carry multipule ordinance packages, and fairly easy to maintain.

    in reply to: US Air Force hones future gunship plans (Replace AC-130) #2656028
    Dog House Ldr.
    Participant

    Why not use the C-27 or the Osprey, the original concept of the gunship was to provide fire support to troops on the ground and have the capability to loiter in the combat area. Would a jet be less likely to be able to stay in the area for an extended period of time. What is your take on this.

    in reply to: Hello? #1563768
    Dog House Ldr.
    Participant

    Once again thanks guys you are all good chaps! 🙂

    in reply to: Hello? #1564885
    Dog House Ldr.
    Participant

    cool john, nice to know Ihave someone on this side of the atlantic that enjoys historical aircraft as much as me!

Viewing 15 posts - 286 through 300 (of 302 total)