1. It’s called LPI for a reason
2. The EF’s MAWS is an ACTIVE broadcasting system which can be picked up by the F-22
3. The EF’s datalink can be picked up by the F-22
4. Leaky EM can be picked up by the F-22
5. It’s called LPI for a reason
😉

1/5 It doesn’t mean it can’t be detected, just the odds of detecting it are lower.

2. Neither the operating frequencies of the MAWS nor the frequency coverage of the AN/ALR-94 are known so your claim is pure speculation.

3. Proof?

4. Leaky EM of F-22s might be detected as well

“Pfeiffer notes that the Eurofighter has better acceleration and can out-climb the F-22. ”

Is this backed up by numbers?
Just a rough look indicates they have similar TWR @ empty, I guess the question is what the fuel load is- the Typhoon having external weapons carriage would hardly help.

The Typhoons were stripped of external stores for these BFMs…

Another article from the Germans performance at Red Flag – Alaska.

http://www.flightglobal.com/news/articles/in-focus-german-eurofighters-impress-during-red-flag-debut-373312/

Some excerpts:

The idea was to bring the German aircraft up to the same standards as the UK Royal Air Force’s Typhoons, Grune says. The RAF’s squadrons have traditionally been on the leading edge of fully exploiting the fighter’s capabilities, for example during last year’s NATO-led operation over Libya.

The biggest change was to the aircraft’s Euro*radar Captor sensor’s software, which was vastly improved, Grune says. New radio, mission data and countermeasures software systems were also added, along with other, classified modifications.

But Grune says the biggest change was not to the Typhoon’s hardware or software, but to the Luftwaffe’s mentality for using the aircraft. “Why is the British air force, for example, so superior with the Eurofighter and we are not?” he asks. “Simply because our force didn’t put the focus on certain areas.”

The Luftwaffe’s mentality began to shift only towards the end of 2011 and the beginning of this year, he says.

As part of the Distant Frontier exercise, F-22s from the USAF’s 525th Fighter Squadron faced off against the German fighters in visual-range basic fighter manoeuvres (BFM) combat training.

While Grune does not directly say that the Eurofighters emerged as the overall victors, he strongly implies it.

“I put out some whiskey. If they come back with some good performances, and if you know what the goal is from a BFM setup, and you achieve that, then I will pay you whiskey,” he says. “And I paid quite a lot of whiskey.”

That account, however, is strongly disputed by USAF sources flying the F-22. “It sounds as though we have very different recollections as to the outcomes of the BFM engagements that were fought,” one Raptor pilot says.

USAF sources say that the Typhoon has good energy and a pretty good first turn, but that they were able to outmanoeuvre the Germans due to the Raptor’s thrust vectoring. Additionally, the Typhoon was not able to match the high angle of attack capability of the F-22. “We ended up with numerous gunshots,” another USAF pilot says.

us air force

Lockheed Martin

F-22s faced off against German fighters

Regardless of their differing accounts, the USAF was grateful for the chance to train with the Luftwaffe. “We optimise the opportunities we get to participate in dissimilar air combat training, as those opportunities are all too rare,” says Lt Col Paul Moga, commander of the 525th Fighter Squadron. “Our recent BFM hops with the German air force Typhoons were outstanding. While certain uncontrollable factors such as weather and manoeuvring limitations did not allow for full-up engagements, it is suffice to say that there was much learning across the board. The details of each set-up are privy only to the pilots that flew them, as that is the sacred standard among fighter pilots. One thing is for certain – Raptors and Typhoons are a lethal combination.”

Grune says that the Raptor’s advantage lies in its stealth and ability to dominate air-to-air fights from beyond visual range. That is not disputed by USAF sources.

“Its unique capabilities are overwhelming from our first impressions in terms of modern air combat,” Pfeiffer says. “But once you get to the merge, which is only a very small spectrum of air combat, in that area the Typhoon doesn’t have to fear the F-22 in all aspects.”

The Typhoons were stripped of their external fuel tanks and slicked off as much as possible before the encounter with the Raptors, says Grune, who adds that in that configuration, the Typhoon is an “animal”.

Pfeiffer notes that the Eurofighter has better acceleration and can out-climb the F-22. *Additionally, he says that the Raptor sinks when it is using its thrust vectoring capabilities, although one USAF source says he is skeptical of the German claims.

Overall, Grune says the two aircraft are closely matched in the visual range arena, but Pfeiffer says the Typhoon is the superior *dogfighter.

At least this time we know it happened.:dev2:

As I’ve been saying for a while, the EFT has been badly managed from the start leading to cost overrun and a platform with very limited capabilities for a aircraft supposed to be 4.5+ Gen.

“Very limited capabilities” depends on how you are looking at it. Very limited multirole capabilities in comparison to other types of that generation is certainly true, but as a fighter the Typhoon isn’t lacking and that’s what it was designed for in the first place. Of course there is room for further improvement in the AA area as well.