dark light

a89

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 151 through 165 (of 349 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: RuAF News and development Thread part 14 #2183535
    a89
    Participant

    They could have simply transferred them to Uganda or Vietnam, instead. The fact is that no Su-27UB upgrade has been materialized within the Russian VVS and the Su-30M2 is the closest option to the Su-27UBM.

    A few years ago there was talk of a possible MK3 variant for China, but it does not make sense to start building the aircraft before contract is signed. I assume that if there were components left from Soviet contracts they were used for export (China).

    China did cancel a production license, but this was for Su-27SK. I assume that Russia still produced many components (engines, electronics…). China probably produced sections of the fuselage. Maybe KnAAPO decided to use components left on Su-30 frames, creating M2 designation. UB variants had flown more in Russian Air Force and were more useful.

    This mean, that capabilities of AL-31FP and Su-30MKI and MKM are well exposed to the West,

    Very debatable. When MKI operate abroad they use a special radar mode to avoid exposure. This is by contract BTW.

    in reply to: RuAF News and development Thread part 14 #2183823
    a89
    Participant

    I think I just read a piece of news stating that no more Su-30M2s will be acquired. Has anyone come across this?

    in reply to: RuAF News and development Thread part 14 #2184785
    a89
    Participant

    So, Indonesia has decided to buy the Su-35, though in batches as the budget allows.

    Whole thing has been decided pretty fast. Eurofighter was offered by Spain. Saab did the same with the Gripen.

    in reply to: Military Aviation News-2015 #2185018
    a89
    Participant

    ….”the deliveries will commence in Dec 2012..”

    That refers to Russian Air Force’s Su-35s.

    in reply to: Horrible aircraft deals in the past 30 years #2185831
    a89
    Participant

    But they’re expensive to run, none of the money spent on buying them comes back to the UK, & they are much more restricted in where they can land & take off than A400M.

    IIRC restrictions on landing/taking off are due to lease contract. Is there any data on cost of maintenance now that the RAF operates both?

    in reply to: Horrible aircraft deals in the past 30 years #2187811
    a89
    Participant

    Already requires replacement.

    Is this being seriously looked at? It is not like if you can retire the aircraft or give it back to seller… Saab has offered Gripen but there not an actual competition.

    in reply to: RuAF News and development Thread part 14 #2187813
    a89
    Participant

    By August 2015 36 were delivered.

    Variants offered can have Pratt & Whitney or Motor-Sich turbines. Are there plans to replace Ukrainian turbine?

    The fleet has flown about 8000 hours. Availability of the fleet during training operations is around 93%.

    That’s impressive. It is a shame it has not gained more orders. Light helicopter market is huge.

    in reply to: RuAF News and development Thread part 14 #2188166
    a89
    Participant

    Any news on Tu-204/214 purchase so far?

    Aerostar has kept the tooling. I was expecting an order at some point.

    Buryat Airlines has signed a contract to lease 15 SSJ. Are these of the 32 the Russian government has agreed to finance?

    http://tass.ru/ekonomika/2215183

    in reply to: RuAF News and development Thread part 14 #2188482
    a89
    Participant

    Not exactly military, but what does the back log order on SSJ look like now?

    Back in March Putin stated that the orderbook was 150. This number can vary a lot because optional aircraft are often included. SSJ is selling more than all other civil airliners combined. A few years ago it was heavily criticised because of the large amount of foreign components, but alternatives (Tu-334) used Ukrainian engines.

    http://tass.ru/en/economy/781319

    in reply to: RuAF News and development Thread part 14 #2188530
    a89
    Participant

    Damn missed the first day (traveling all day), great pics!

    Nice summary, perhaps it could be updated with other news announced during the show:

    GLTK and Sukhoi Civil Aviation have signed an agreement to finance the acquisition of 32 SSJ.

    http://www.aex.ru/news/2015/8/25/140044/

    IFC and Roseksimbank signed an agreement for delivery of An-158 aircraft to Cuba

    http://www.ruaviation.com/news/2015/8/26/3475/

    in reply to: RuAF News and development Thread part 14 #2189795
    a89
    Participant

    We have 8 MiG-29SMT for the RuAF.

    Interesting, I did not know 8 were alrady supposed to be delivered this year. The only reference I had to deliveries said that it would be done over 3 years. It will be interesting to find out who is the buyer of those 6 MiG-29.

    in reply to: RuAF News and development Thread part 14 #2190644
    a89
    Participant

    It appears that only B/BS can be upgraded to BM standard. The stored ones were usually just vanilla MiG-31’s (and many of early series probably), not even DZ’s

    True, but wouldn’t it make sense to develop an upgraded version of BM for vanilla MiG-31, rather than to put entire aircraft back to production?

    The Fulcrums are a different story. The SMT upgrade program was never launched, the MiGs are simply soldiering on in their old config. If there wasn’t the spoiled Algerian order, there would be no SMTs in Russian service.

    Back in the 90s there was another scandal with the SMT. MAPO-MiG claimed that contracts had been signed with VVS but it wasn’t the case. At some point it seemed that VVS was going to let MiG-29 fleet die. Again, there is a number of stored aircraft, but new contracts are going to be signed for new SMT using stored airframes. The MiG-29 did suffer from corrosion problems, thus stored aircraft are in poor condition.

    I assume new Su-27SM3 came from unfulfilled Chinese contracts?

    in reply to: RuAF News and development Thread part 14 #2190655
    a89
    Participant

    Hmm. Hydromash is going to start production of MiG-31 landing gear this year.

    There are a number of early production aircraft retired or stored. Doesn’t it make more sense to refurbish and modernise these? Having said that, maybe they are in a pretty bad state. I was discussing this in another forum as someone was asking why Russia is acquiring such a high number of +4 aircraft when they inherited a large number of Su-27/MiG-29/MiG-31 from USSR.

    in reply to: Military Aviation News-2015 #2193920
    a89
    Participant

    Georgia sold 15 “new” Su-25 to Azerbaijan. The contract was worth 150 million $ and includes technology to carry out repairs/servicing. As cooperation with Russia is non-existent since 08/08/08, Azerbaijan bought the engines from Russia.

    http://razm.info/ru/6800

    Available information states that the aircraft are “new”, but I doubt that Tbilisi factory still has capability to produce new airframes. Maybe the aircraft were stored or built with components left there after 1991.

    in reply to: RuAF News and development Thread part 14 #2159575
    a89
    Participant

    Op Tempo, Sustainment Flaws Hit Russian Air Force

    The mention to Tu-95 engine production is interesting. NK-12 production was one of the issues when it came to extending the life of An-22 Antey.

    FSB is ordering 5 Mi-35, for delivery by the end of 2017. Deal is worth 2.83 billion rubles.

    Unit price is really low, about 10 million $. Are these going to be new built or refurbished?

    By the way, what type of RWR/IR jammer does it have? according to an article it still has SPO-15. IR jammer is not thought to be effective against latest MANPADS. I would expect the fleet to be upgraded, especially after recent events in Ukraine. There is no place for obsolete helicopters in a well defended battle area.

Viewing 15 posts - 151 through 165 (of 349 total)