dark light

starikki

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 12 posts - 211 through 222 (of 222 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: Chinese J-XX/14/20 p.2 #2331386
    starikki
    Participant

    I don’t get it..
    Why couldn’t they design the MLG doors to swing out from top not like we see here below and down?

    I think it’s more of a integrated maintenance door just for prototype

    in reply to: Chinese J-XX/14/20 p.2 #2331403
    starikki
    Participant

    so cockpit details are still classified:cool:

    in reply to: Chinese J-XX/14/20 p.2 #2331641
    starikki
    Participant

    hmm, are you sure? to me it looks angled…

    ahhh…. sorry mate… thought you are talking about wing tip cuts

    I’m sure it’s angled trailing edge….and my early calculation showed the angle is around 10.5degree
    My prediction drawing’s here 😀
    http://img.cjdby.com/attachments_cd/month_1101/1101030049ab7f83352d68aef4.jpg.thumb.jpg

    in reply to: Chinese J-XX/14/20 p.2 #2331664
    starikki
    Participant

    Damn, from above photos it seems that the wing trailing edge is really angled, am I right guys? The J-20 looks really cool…

    nope looks like no angled cut

    in reply to: Chinese J-XX/14/20 p.2 #2331678
    starikki
    Participant

    http://img.cjdby.com/attachments_cd/month_1101/11010623375dfc8a1063d3bf97.jpg.thumb.jpg

    http://www.fyjs.cn/bbs/attachments/Mon_1101/27_166531_54713f2349141aa.jpg

    looks much smaller from this angle…

    and very looong LEX

    in reply to: Chinese J-XX/14/20 p.2 #2332418
    starikki
    Participant

    A B737 arrived at CF, today might be the day…

    in reply to: Chinese J-XX/14/20 p.2 #2332445
    starikki
    Participant

    Very high and canted wing (losing effective lift, God knows why chinese did it), boxy fuselage, crude fuselage topology conventional delta with relative big wing area, canards, close engine assembling, limiting complex compossed manouvres-combinations for it TVC system

    vs

    Blended wing, generating full lift, fuselage heavily based on lift body concept, complex surface topology, Levcons, having the balls to stuff the bomb bay at the same level of the wing…

    Nope, the J-20 is based on old concepts, this plane is somewhat outdated

    You are being driven by appareances, beware, this plane is already painted and looking nice, as the Yf-22 or the x-35 were….

    Hint:

    The f-35 can’t do any kind of aerobatics yet….unlike the T-50

    If you would call Canards+LERX+Trapezoidal wing (not Delta) configuration using Vortex lift theory Convensional… OK… how do you explain the SU-27 ass on T-50 then…:D

    METAR ZUUU 060200Z 00000MPS 1600 R02L/1200 BR NSC 03/02 Q1032 NOSIG=
    weather is pretty good, first flight might be on today!

    in reply to: Chinese J-XX/14/20 p.2 #2332968
    starikki
    Participant

    Is this 2002 or 2001 with new engines?:confused:

    http://img.cjdby.com/attachments_cd/month_1101/11010522148e80b06113f29fef.jpg
    http://img.cjdby.com/attachments_cd/month_1101/1101052214ac5f4838b14886cc.jpg

    in reply to: Chinese J-XX/14/20 p.2 #2336046
    starikki
    Participant

    Bear in mind that they’re probably bigger than they look, since there is no diverter gap.

    Phaid: the nozzle turkey feathers look wrong for the engines to be D-30F6s, most likely it is powered by an AL-31F variant. Before there were good pictures available I did admittedly consider that possibility too though.

    it uses DSI …. that’s why it has no diverter gap…:D

    in reply to: Chinese J-XX/14/20 p.2 #2336644
    starikki
    Participant

    So it is more like a twin-engine f-35 then.

    I’d say F/B-22/23…:D

    in reply to: Chinese J-XX/14/20 p.2 #2336648
    starikki
    Participant

    The YF-23 had a far larger main bay than YF-22 (and F-22). The only problem was the sidewinder bay which is part of ther reason the F-23 had a longer fuselage.

    I thought the sidewinder bay never appeared on the aircraft…

    in reply to: Chinese J-XX/14/20 p.2 #2336927
    starikki
    Participant

    In my opinion an increadably simple landing gear housing doors for a fifth gen. aircraft. Its getting clear how they created the bird in such a short time! Can be dangerous in an emergency situation or full load but sure they already knows it.

    [ATTACH]191292[/ATTACH]

    1. Is this possibly an integrated maintenance door? May be this would explain the size…
    2. Judging for the photo this door can be shut once the main landing gears are fully extended. It might be left open only for taxi test purposes…
    3. OR…Would it help yaw stabilization at approach?

Viewing 12 posts - 211 through 222 (of 222 total)