dark light

starikki

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 76 through 90 (of 222 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: Chinese Version of E-2 #2345817
    starikki
    Participant

    This is the suppossed wind tunnel model of the “chinese Hawkeye”.

    I guess they are going for some CATOBAR CVs after the STOBAR.

    This is the suppossed wind tunnel model of the “chinese Hawkeye”.

    I guess they are going for some CATOBAR CVs after the STOBAR.

    you mean this one?

    in reply to: J-20 Black Eagle – Part 5 #2349182
    starikki
    Participant

    These the pics we’re talking about?

    I particularly like the first shot… if only it was a bit higher rez and the sun was a bit brighter 😮

    well if you get it from a third party who ignored the warning, not our problem:D

    ————
    authorization arrived, a bit late:D
    this pic and those on #65
    by evilmoon and 小海哥
    http://lt.cjdby.net/viewthread.php?tid=1131868&extra=&page=1

    in reply to: J-20 Black Eagle – Part 5 #2349505
    starikki
    Participant

    So should i understand that the original poster did not agree to have the pic you were talking about posted somewhere else, Starikki?:(
    What is it anyway , it a high-rez of J-20 with gear up ?:eek:

    He hasn’t answer my PM so far 🙁

    two pics of J-20 dumping fuel… clouds of smoke from both nozzle… with a hint of golden sun shine:D
    and a nice photo of touch down

    in reply to: Chinese Version of E-2 #2349755
    starikki
    Participant

    I cant help but LOL when I remember that at first when these pictures appeared on the net some chinese posters vehemently claimed it was built as a mockup for practising carrier landings and crew training!:D

    That was another one:cool:

    in reply to: J-20 Black Eagle – Part 5 #2349861
    starikki
    Participant

    What a beauty …what ? sorry, i can’t see anything .:confused:

    sorry he said no to be posted anywhere other than cjdby and fyjs
    I’m asking for permission now:D

    in reply to: J-20 Black Eagle – Part 5 #2349911
    starikki
    Participant

    edit:
    sorry not authorised by original poster please follow the link
    ————————————

    what a beauty 😉

    by evilmoon, from
    http://lt.cjdby.net/viewthread.php?tid=1131868&extra=&page=1

    in reply to: Chinese Version of E-2 #2350053
    starikki
    Participant

    yak-44E had 2 instead of 4 Vertical fins.

    Oh god that Anhedral wing, don’t tell me they really moded a Y-7.

    Very likely:D

    中航工业人士向《第一财经日报》透露,“‘十一五’期间,西飞集团积极开展对内对外合资、合作,实施‘两融、三新、五化、万亿’发展战略,实现了一机首飞、一机定型,全面完成各项重点型号任务。”

    http://lt.cjdby.net/redirect.php?goto=findpost&ptid=1130526&pid=29165157&fromuid=285557

    in reply to: Eurocanards vs J-20 and J-10B #2350271
    starikki
    Participant

    Loke :

    Like many other fine gentlemen , you fail to understand than 1 : RWRs will detect the adverse radar way before the 5th gen to be in range to fire and 2 : to score a BVR kill , the missile must hit .

    A missile leaving its rail does not mean a kill , not yet . All good missiles have some ECCMs but none are jam proof . Three things can be jammed , the adverse aircraft ‘s radar if the tracking is continuous , the missile up-link and the missile ‘s radar itself when it goes live .

    Without an external “eye” (third part) and/or external tracking (third part) , a 5th gen fighter is in the same sh.t than a 4th gen fighter in BVR , beside the fact that it can close in much easily . Even if it fires at 20-30km , there is still enough time for a good ECM suite to pulse away thousands of electronic tricks .

    But if the BVR missile is using an IR seeker , things get a bit more complicated for the defender …

    A lot of people believe that such combat will end up WVR .

    Cheers .

    5th gen IRST/EODAS might change the defination of BVR and WVR a bit though…

    5th would have more advantages in tracking and targeting passively, optical or EM wise

    if you can spot enemy first, and moves faster, you’ll have the initiative on whether/when/where to attack

    in reply to: Eurocanards vs J-20 and J-10B #2350339
    starikki
    Participant

    Well that was just my definition — my point is that if the J-20 fits what I defined as “5. gen” then both Typhoon and Rafale will struggle and most likely fail.

    And that should not come as a surprise should it?

    What Scorpion82 said was however even more relevant — we don’t know what capabilities J-20 will get — perhaps it’s RCS will be in the Rafale class — and perhaps it’s sensors will be inferior to both Rafale and Typhoon. In which case both Eurocanards would be able to handle the J-20.

    perhaps J-20 has EODAS, perhaps, perhaps, perhaps:D
    (heard from the guy who accuratly predicted every bit of J-20 in 2008 and many other stuff:cool:)

    in reply to: J-20 Black Eagle – Part 5 #2350743
    starikki
    Participant

    getting more and more interesting

    in reply to: J-20 Black Eagle – Part 5 #2351000
    starikki
    Participant

    flew again today, for quite a long time
    with a few low passes while retracting/droping landing gear

    in reply to: J-20 Black Eagle – Part 5 #2353339
    starikki
    Participant

    From huzhigeng, who leaked accurate details of J-20 years ago
    J-20 has EODAS
    from here, #147
    http://lt.cjdby.net/viewthread.php?tid=1128215

    also… someone was thinking about some what ifs…:diablo:
    http://forum.keypublishing.co.uk/attachment.php?attachmentid=194870&stc=1&d=1304336154
    http://forum.keypublishing.co.uk/attachment.php?attachmentid=194871&stc=1&d=1304336154
    source:
    http://lt.cjdby.net/thread-1129145-1-1.html

    in reply to: J-20 Black Eagle – Part 5 #2354172
    starikki
    Participant

    No, never ever … since never a Chinese fighter had a bay these are surely only faked lines made by Photoshop ! :diablo:

    … some will claim.

    Deino 😉

    totally agree about that 😀

    in reply to: J-20 Black Eagle – Part 4 #2359357
    starikki
    Participant

    NEW pic of weapon bay

    in reply to: J-20 Black Eagle – Part 4 #2359752
    starikki
    Participant

    It seems 2001 has no side weapons bays.

    And ….:diablo:

    http://forum.keypublishing.co.uk/attachment.php?attachmentid=194423&stc=1&d=1303085112

    http://forum.keypublishing.co.uk/attachment.php?attachmentid=194424&stc=1&d=1303085112

    http://lt.cjdby.net/thread-1119519-1-1.html

    This means they did manage to have a nice fit then?

    also, heard air brake opened yesterday

    btw… Is that a missile on the bay door??

Viewing 15 posts - 76 through 90 (of 222 total)