dark light

adrian_gray

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 3,031 through 3,045 (of 3,057 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: Tom Cruise prepares for remake of 'Reach for the sky' #1426973
    adrian_gray
    Participant

    It could have been a lot worse…

    Back when I was knee high to a Slingsby Grasshopper (about 1984) I remember the owner of an all-yellow Tiger Moth at Headcorn telling me that someone had uttered the magic words “It’s amazing how flimsy these things are” as they had leaned towrds his wing… There was tearing noise and the guy’s arm went through the fabric!

    So at least the Yak is unhurt!

    Adrian

    in reply to: Hurricane bare-bones #1436031
    adrian_gray
    Participant

    “Seems to me that there is a high content of wood craftsmanship in a hurricane”

    In 1978 (aged 7!) I spent an afternoon around a hole in a field in Essex watching a Hurricane come out in VERY small pieces – and there was an awful lot of wood there! Mostly small-cross section stuff (probably 1″ by 1/2″ at most) – I remember being most struck by the fact that the brass pins in it were still shiny. Never occured to me at the time that the ha’penny I picked up off the spoil heap had been in someone’s pocket when they smacked into the earth from x thousand feet….

    adrian

    in reply to: Whoops-a-daisy!! #1558144
    adrian_gray
    Participant

    I recall seeing a “from the cockpit” photo, possibly in one of Eddie Doylerushe’s books, of one wing tip of a Dakota. The aircraft in question had flown – in cloud – into the Berwyns in mid/North Wales and had scraped between two peaks. The gap between the two was about 12 feet less than the Dak’s wingspan, with the result that six feet of each wingtip was turned up like those winglets you get nowadays.

    Has anyone else seen it, or even one of both wingtips, or have I been out in the sun too long?

    Adrian

    adrian_gray
    Participant

    OK, batch no3 – the thing that looks like a block of flats at the top is a Caproni flying boat – Ca60? I’m amazed no-one nominated for Ugliest Aircraft Ever a while back.

    Third one – a Richard Pearse machine replica, I reckon… That huge cast-iron pole can’t be original though or no-one could claim he’d ever got it off the ground…

    Adrian

    in reply to: Warhawks and Girls (you'll wanna see this…) #1559736
    adrian_gray
    Participant

    Was that a De Haviland Canada Beaver I saw there?

    in reply to: Russian Hampden bits #1560472
    adrian_gray
    Participant

    Which leads us to the old question of when it becomes a replica… (no, NOT a good one to discuss, especially as it began life as a thread on the flying tadpole).

    Sorry folks, I am just interested in how much or how little one can rebuild from a crash site – Spitfires do seem to have the biggest cachet if you can rebuild one (probably P-51 next) – and why some aircraft seem to be rebuildable from small piles of scrap whilst with others you don’t seem to be able to do it if you have an near-intact airframe.

    So presumably the major factors are:

    availability of components

    Availability of important things to make components with (like money)?

    Adrian

    in reply to: Russian Hampden bits #1560477
    adrian_gray
    Participant

    That’s a very interesting point, Yak 11 Fan. I’ve been rather bemused by some of the reports of aircraft coming out of Russia “to be restored to airworthy condition” – one in Flypast a number of years ago particularly comes to mind as being a spread of wreckage laid out in what from a plan view was recognizable as a Spitfire, but from side on looked more like roadkill. I’ve no doubt that some will fly (Fw189, I hope!) and some HAVE flown, but I do wonder whether some recovery teams might have over-egged the cake a bit….

    Adrian

    in reply to: Russian Hampden bits #1560500
    adrian_gray
    Participant

    hmm not much to look at eh?

    Cat amongst the pigeons time…

    If it was a Spitfire someone would be restoring it to fly right now.

    Discuss the above statement.

    ADrian

    in reply to: US Use of Tallboy / Grand Slam… #1561874
    adrian_gray
    Participant

    That might go a long way to explaining the consequences – mind, that drop was at closer to six than sixty feet…

    in reply to: Sunderland G-BJHS……Remember? #1562482
    adrian_gray
    Participant

    The first warbird (of not enough) I ever got on board! It was an open day at Chatham dockyard in about 1985-6 – certainly pre-hurricane of October 1987. The “tatty” interior is the one that was in there then – I distinctly remember that little bar, even if I was only about 14! So given that I think that Flypast has said several times that KW is going to rip it out and refit, it could be a lot tattier!

    Oh to see her in the air again!

    Adrian

    in reply to: Warhawks and Girls (you'll wanna see this…) #1563563
    adrian_gray
    Participant

    Not quite Diana Rigg and a Lancaster…

    But very 1966!

    Had a little Google (but they’ve given me some pills and it’s gone away now)

    http://theavengers.tv/forever/peel1-9.htm

    In this episode the undercarriage of what I am sure is a Mosquito is seen with Emma Peel (another exquisite undercarriage!) peering round it. Given that the airfield is apparently Bovingdon, I suspect that before long we will have chapter and verse on the list as to which Mosquito it is (was)…

    Adrian

    in reply to: Warhawks and Girls (you'll wanna see this…) #1563753
    adrian_gray
    Participant

    Nice Warhawks! (sorry, am I missing something obvious?)

    Adrian

    in reply to: US Use of Tallboy / Grand Slam… #1563762
    adrian_gray
    Participant

    Likewise, I have seen the same footage – Channel 4 (who have broadcast some stinkers, but didn’t they also broadcast “Spitfire Ace? If “Bomber Pilot” is HALF as good…), “Secret History”, probably 1993… The aircraft concerned was a twin with a high single tail (ie not a B25) and a wing that appeared to have a forward sweep – I suspect in practice that it had a straight leading edge and a tapered trailing edge. I watched it times and couldn’t be sure what it was – either Boston/Havoc or Invader – as the film was poor quality and very grainy. Given that the drop was from such low level that the rebound took the tail off the ‘plane, the best thing about it was that I doubt that the poor beggars inside even had the time to think “Manure!” before they died. NOT nice.

    Of course this adds nothing to the story about Rabaul, but perhaps a little to the possibilities of Upkeep?

    Adrian

    in reply to: Hunter on the Roof #1564649
    adrian_gray
    Participant

    Buccaneer leaking hydraulic fluid in a bar……. So all my suspicions as to cocktails are spot on! 😮

    Seriously, thanks, folks! I’ll claim “spotted-it-just-as-the-trafic-lights-changed-itis” as to how I mistook a Hunter T7 for an Iskra – it was far enough off, in incongruous surroundings, and I only saw it for a second or two… That’s my backside shot off in combat, then!

    Adrian

    P.S. WT555 looked to have all it’s panels on, and be mighty well polished the other day – let’s hope that, if it really has been refurbished and is only up there occasionally, it will be in fair condition and end up properly preserved….

    in reply to: Hunter on the Roof #1565245
    adrian_gray
    Participant

    Cor, that was fast! Thanks, Mike!

    Now what the blank is an airframe of that importance doing on a roof!

    Adrian

Viewing 15 posts - 3,031 through 3,045 (of 3,057 total)