dark light

harryRIEDL

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 331 through 345 (of 350 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: Small carriers. Garibaldi vs Principe de Asturias #2057805
    harryRIEDL
    Participant

    but they have no orders for the thoughdeck version only the LPD. it would be good if the royal schelde ordered one to augment their caperblitys.
    but they do have the camperbiltys to bulid one if needed

    in reply to: Small carriers. Garibaldi vs Principe de Asturias #2057993
    harryRIEDL
    Participant

    i personal prefer PdA it has cleaner looking lines with the small bridge. are thery any other euro carriers being built apart from the CVF/PA2 cavor and BPE? would the neatherlands be in a market for a small LHA or pocket carrier?

    in reply to: why is STOBAR used so little #2058100
    harryRIEDL
    Participant

    thanks i thought it was the other way around the cats being complecated and the aresstor gear was simple.
    wasn’t carriers in WWII STOBAR?
    so isn’t india making a bad choise with their Keiv class and their ADS ships as they are both STOBAR

    in reply to: Small carriers. Garibaldi vs Principe de Asturias #2058271
    harryRIEDL
    Participant

    my mistake i thought PdA was the smaller of the two ships Garibialdi dose have an inpressive complerment of air craft considering its size and araments.

    in reply to: Small carriers. Garibaldi vs Principe de Asturias #2058288
    harryRIEDL
    Participant

    PdA is more of a pure carrier in the vain of the invisable class. isn’t the PdA alot smaller than garibaldi and has smiler amout of av8s?

    in reply to: the russian typoon class sub #2058660
    harryRIEDL
    Participant

    how long were the deploments for 1 year or was it less. to me it seems to be the submersible eqverlent of the b36 which were both increderbly large in comparison to the rivels.

    in reply to: The Strike Beagle?! #2603465
    harryRIEDL
    Participant

    is that the same begle which the ruissian built with the uk engine copys.

    the Chinese did make changes to this very old desine it seems to me like reoperning production on the cannber or the B57

    in reply to: the russian typoon class sub #2058748
    harryRIEDL
    Participant

    it is massive it is almos as hevey as the Kiev class

    Displacement: 43,000-45,500 metric tons full load

    typoon class Surfaced:
    23,200-24,500 tonnes
    Submerged:
    33,800-48,000 tonnes
    see when it submerged it ways more than the kiev

    in reply to: Aviation – Plain Naval Avia Discusion Thread #2560775
    harryRIEDL
    Participant

    will the new amrican aircraft carrier will it have space for more aircraft due to haveing a smaller brige and moden technologey

    sry about spelling dislexic

    in reply to: Army/Navy subfora issues thread #2561351
    harryRIEDL
    Participant

    its a shame the were some good threads in both forums

    in reply to: Norway to Back out of F-35 JSF Over Industrial Share #2567371
    harryRIEDL
    Participant

    would Australian and canada be in the market for Typhoon and Rafalal if they drop out of the jsf

    and if they and the UK drop out what will happen to the jsf progreame?

    in reply to: which contreys could fight a falkland style war #2569525
    harryRIEDL
    Participant

    im under the assumption that the population is in support of the power on the island and that the aggerssor is unable to fight a long 2-3 year campain.

    but dosn’t the the commared of the task foreces ability to conduct the campain and his ability to command inportet

    in reply to: Italian STOVL Carrier – Cavour ? #2060582
    harryRIEDL
    Participant

    though STOBAR and CATOBAR might have be fitted more easly on the cavor.

    is there any reson why STOBAR isn’t used more by contreys

    in reply to: which contreys could fight a falkland style war #2572795
    harryRIEDL
    Participant

    so most of the g8 eu could perform the assalt on the falkland islands. is it relinet of ship born power?

    could a small contrey like austrailer at great cost win or its it more relinet on LPH, LPD and aircraft carriers, would japan be able to win as well i know there a self defence forece but should they be capable of wining.

    p.s im dislexic so spelling and putoation isn’t so good

    in reply to: India seals high-tech U.S. arms deal #2575028
    harryRIEDL
    Participant

    isn’t iran the jackal in the discription

Viewing 15 posts - 331 through 345 (of 350 total)