dark light

Paul Cushion

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 181 through 195 (of 310 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: East Fortune Comet #2082246
    Paul Cushion
    Participant

    If there is any truth in this rumour, I think it is disgraceful. These people seem to be a law unto themselves and need to be regulated in my opinion.

    Paul.

    in reply to: Halifax NA337 Update #2083627
    Paul Cushion
    Participant

    Bristol Hercules engine parts and starter motors? Are they going to run her up then? I hope so, that would be cool!

    Paul.

    in reply to: Missing Phantom at RAF Woodvale!!!! #2084116
    Paul Cushion
    Participant

    Nose section as well? I hope not. Will they be getting another aircraft for display as all the gravel is still there……..?

    Also, does anyone know what happened to the Meteor that they used to have there until the early nineties?

    Paul.

    in reply to: Stirling LK488 #2084129
    Paul Cushion
    Participant

    Well I reckon that there must be one or two at the bottom of a Fjord somewhere……. it stands to reason that one must have ditched in similar circumstances to the recovered Halifaxes……… anyone know of any contenders?

    Paul.

    in reply to: Iraqi Airways #758461
    Paul Cushion
    Participant

    Presuming that they have been recently flyable, it would be interesting to see the maintenance state of these aircraft!!!!!!!!! With lack of spares, design support e.t.c. I bet they are flying deathtraps!!!!!!!!!

    Paul

    in reply to: Is it just me? #2085603
    Paul Cushion
    Participant

    Why did they not want the Olympus? Surely that would have been the best engine for the aircraft at the time????

    I know that it had it’s initial limitations/problems but surely these would have been overcome.

    In fact the most impressive TSR2 footage in my opinion is Beamont accelerating rapidly away from the Lightning chase plane with just one afterburner engaged! I think that was the only time she ever went supersonic…

    Paul.

    in reply to: Vampire for sale #2085611
    Paul Cushion
    Participant

    Oh I’m glad about that! It’s the first Military aircraft that I had ever got close to and sparked my interest in Flypast era aircraft………

    Thanks for that info!

    Paul.

    in reply to: Vampire for sale #2085661
    Paul Cushion
    Participant

    Also, the Air Training Corps used to have a complete Vampire in the yard at Newtown in Wigan well into the 1980’s. My dad used to work at BAe Lostock with the guy who ran it and he claims that he was offered it for £300!!!!!!

    Pity he did’nt buy it, our garden was big and accesible enough too!

    Does anyone know what happened to her? I hope she was’nt scrapped. I think the fuselage prefix was XD????

    Paul.

    in reply to: Derelict aero engine #2086453
    Paul Cushion
    Participant

    It is from a Halifax which crashed on Great Carrs which is the summit next to the old man of Coniston. It has been moved now I think. The Halifax crashed on the mountain on a training flight killing all of it’s Canadian crew. It was however, still rather complete, so rather than leave it where it was or bring it doen, it was cut up at the time and the remains pushed into the gully below. There used to be a lot of this aircraft lying around up until the 70’s when most of it was plundered by souvenir hunters……..

    The engine itself was recovered by Chinook in the early 90’s and ever since that time various supernatural phenomenon have been connected with the engine and the people who recovered it!

    I am going back up North this weekend and will get you the serial number and more details about the aircraft. I have them in a book at home.

    If you want to climb Great Carrs at any time, you will see the complete undercarriage (less tyres) at the top next to a memorial cairn.

    Paul.

    in reply to: Which airline has the worst aircraft? #653096
    Paul Cushion
    Participant

    I remember the old TAP (portugal) 727’s taking off from MAN in the 80’s. Tails COMPLETLY Black.

    It looked terrible, but………..

    They never seemed to give a Sh1T!!!!!!!!!:)

    Paul

    in reply to: Is it just me? #2086587
    Paul Cushion
    Participant

    Is this true? If so, I think it is terrible. I don’t know all the facts so I cannot comment further, but I am sure the must be a market for someone to buy this aircraft and keep it airworthy???

    Paul.

    in reply to: XH558 Latest news #2087004
    Paul Cushion
    Participant

    Anyway, the Vulcan raid were not unsuccesful in any way. The fact that not all bombs hit the runway meant nothing, the facts are:

    1) The runway was put out of action for a period of time.

    2) Super Entendards could not use this airfield until repaired, thus preventing some attacks on the fleet.

    3) Morale of the occupying Argentinians was damaged. Would’nt yours be if you were in danger of having 21,000lb of bombs lofted at your position, or a Shrike coming at your Skyguard Radar post without even probably hearing the aircraft?

    4) The Argentinians had to remain on standby on the mainland as we proved that we could hit Buenos Airies if we wanted to.

    That’s why I think that the raids were a success. Cmdr ‘Sharkey’ Ward claims in his book, Sea Harrier over the Falklands, that the SHAR force could have done the job better, which is possibly true, but the Vulcan was used almost in it’s intended role; that of a deterrent – a psychological weapon used to make the enemy think twice. I am more than confident that the Victor could have done an equally good job as a bomber, but although more technically advanced, it was a lot weaker – it’s airframe would have been eaten up very quickly in the post 1960’s low level regime. This is why they were all converted to tankers and not the Vulcan which had a incredibly strong airframe.

    OK, the raids cost a lot of money and resources but even as a seven year old, I can remember them happening and how the news trumpeted (what I remember at the time as…!) this strange aircraft “weeks away from being retired”. I remember everyone saying at the time “I hope they change their minds now! Keep the thing in service!” such is the allure of the Vulcan. She put britain back on the map as a credible power. If you ask most people what they can remember about the Falklands war, they will usually mention the Vulcan raids.

    Back to the original point of this thread, this is why the Vulcan is so special. She has an allure of her own and stands as a symbol of the cold war might of the west and the detente that she helped maintain.

    This is why the Vulcan, especially 558′ deserves better. She has secured her place in history. She also deserves because of this to secure her place back in the air.

    Will this happen? I don’t know. I hope so. If any other aircraft deserves to fly again it should be the Vulcan. I have been privileged to see her fly although I’m sure a lot of people on this forum have’nt which is a shame in my opinion.:(

    Paul.

    in reply to: XH558 Latest news #2088028
    Paul Cushion
    Participant

    Well actually she had about 16 hours left. Enough for a ferry flight to the US if neccesary.

    My issue is that she was maintained to RAF schedules since march 1993 and was therefore still in flying condition, therefore, why was she pulled apart BEFORE the lottery application???

    On the last taxi run at Bruntingthorpe before she was hangared, Dave Thomas was quoted to say that he would have happily have taken her up if he was allowed to, such was her excellent condition.

    She does in fact need a rear spar modification as approved by BAe. The major service to all her components I think is merely a CAA requirement. Is this correct?

    I’m not being a defeatist, I would do anything to see her in the air again. I am however a realist and would be most happy just to see her howl down the runway at Bruntingthorpe for many years to come as a consolation prize.

    A bag of bits in a hanger which everyone is quibbling over is not fair on the people who have (including myself) contributed to XH558 since 1993 or indeed this fantastic example of British engineering herself.

    Originally, the Vulcan was said by TVOC to have a life of 5-7 years, then it was 10 and now they are saying 15+ My issue is, is that how are these people supposed to have any credibility if they can pluck fact and figures out of the air like this?

    If you went to buy a car and asked the salesman how long it would be before it got worn out and you had to buy a new one and he said “5 years” and then when you said that was’nt good enough, he then said “ok, ten”. You would’nt be inclined to buy the car anyway would you, so it;s the same thing. As much as I dislike the motives of the HLF and indeed a lot of the things that they stand for, you can’t blame them for not paying now can you? The original proposal was sound in my opinion, but you don’t get more credibility on your next application by offering something extra that you might not be able to deliver…

    Paul.

    in reply to: XH558 Latest news #2088342
    Paul Cushion
    Participant

    Yeah, but the point is Ant, that the people that own the Vulcan are saying this!

    My point is that if these people are prepared to make such preposterous, sweeping statements like that fact that she will be preserved in taxiing condition at Duxford, what hope have we really got for her flying again?

    In one of my first posts on this thread, I highlighted that it has been rumoured that they can’t even afford/are unable to restore her to taxiing condition as it stands at the moment.

    No disrespect to Dr Pleming and co, but have’nt they got some explaining to do????

    As far as I am concerned, anyone can come out with the kind of flannel which is copied in the thread a few above and sound like they mean it. A reliance in the lottery fund was ill thought out and they should have waited until they definately could have had the money before they took her to bits. If people try to tell you that they had to in order to to “check the viability”, it is rubbish. They knew full well that the aircraft was capable of flight again since delivery and there was no need to pull her to bits. 558′ was Bruntingthorpes star attraction at the taxiing days and would have been so for many years to come.

    We now have a pile of bits with doubtful chance of flying or even taxiing again…

    Paul.

    in reply to: XH558 Latest news #2088354
    Paul Cushion
    Participant

    Forgive my cyniscism, but in my opinion Duxford would be the worst possible place to send XH558 upon her second retirement.

    Firstly, there is nowhere to keep her undercover and secondly the IWM’s attitude to aircraft preservation is questionable in my opinion. Just think about their intentions for the Shackleton……. The state of the once airworthy Varsity, the scrapping of the Comet…… Victor XH648 was also fully [systems] operational until 1990 when they decided to stop her sytems being run up without good reason…… why can’t she stay at Bruntingthorpe after retirement where she is cared for by people who are dedicated to just her….?

    Also, how are they supposed to fast taxi a Vulcan on such a short runway and how are they supposed to taxi such a large aircraft around the airfield at all without seriously endangering the health and safety of the public?

    People should think about the feasability of it all before they make these sweeping statements in my opinion.

    I know I might get flak for my opinions, but this is what I think….. what do you all think?

    Paul.

Viewing 15 posts - 181 through 195 (of 310 total)