That tail assembly looks familiar…what aeroplane was it ?
For your reference;
http://www.twitt.org/bldwing.htm#top
Blended Wing Bodies !
http://www.up-ship.com/eAPR/ev1n3.htm
Video of a model flying; http://aero.stanford.edu/BWB.mov
Locheed CL-1201-1-1 design was 1180+ ft in span !
BWBs work as good platform for solar powered passenger aeroplane since they have lots area.
Isn’t it amazing that Solar Impuls in only using 21 % of the capacity it could use for flying ( see it stores capacity into batteries during daytime).
http://www.solarimpulse.com/en/
Solar Impuls has 8kg/m2 wing loading and moves at over 70km/h at 38 000 ft ( twice the speed of the same out put human powered aeroplanes ).
It is customary at the Museum to tow the aeroplanes outside for a day for a photo shoot after they have been restored. Unfortunately the Finnish weather is usually too harsh to display the planes outside even for a day per year.
From the original combat reports one can deduce that I-152 and I-15bis were in fact the same aeroplane type. Interesting enough the I-15s were marked simply as I-15s!
I sorta expected this. 😎
Awesome…any news about the flying HC developement ?
It is amiracle they scored 3 x I-152 since 3 were ever built; http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Polikarpov_I-15
Eh make that 88 pmpg…it was gallons not liters they spent 10 at an hour.
Pipistrel Panthera
These gentlemen claim 200 kts speed and 1000 nm range; http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cODrRSEF3W8&feature=related
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0gApX-cAYMs&feature=related
…and 350 pmpg ( passenger miler per gallon ).
….UNHEARD OF !
All aviation books say He-219 was pressurized…I have seen no info that verifys this. He-219B-2 was planned to be pressurized.
http://www.pilotfriend.com/aircraft%20performance/Gardan%20GY80.htm
That seems to have 777 miles range.
I counted 118 pmpg..that is a high end claim for a 4 seater with fixed gear..not saying…
Wonder if they forgot Brequet range formula ?
This claims nearly 1000 nm range at 118 pmpg ( passenger miles per gallon ).
http://www.love4aviation.com/Aircraft/MCR-4S+index/Specifications.html
250+ km/h at 20 l/hr; http://www.pilotmix.com/index.php?pgid=11&lang=en&maxInfo=323
I heard someone visited this Moller “factory”. There is absolutely nothing going on there.
I recall wankel engines are no longer produced by anyone..this would need 8 of them ?!
I once counted a lite weight transport uses 26 times less fuel ( per stretcher patient ) than a helicopter like the heli-ambulaces are today like EC-135.
No offence, but even if Moller got this flying it would end at the first crash…and most it could possibly sell is 10-20 before the crash takes place. If you invested on this ( like many have ) then good luck…miracles may also happen.
😉
Recall what Burt Rutan says in the video..just about everything can go wrong in this type of device.
This is like the LLRV that Buzz Aldrin and Neil Armstrong trained with…you need to be a top aviator to fly one…and still you get grey hair before 40.
———
One more thing…someone I know had his dad working at the Moller way back. He said even if they got it flying it has a range about 15 minutes..there is no room for the fuel when 4 people are inside.
Problem with kinda threads is that they get closed fast.
Here is some humour to it; http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SN74T2v6Hg8&feature=related
Anyway I firmly belive that it is possible to fly with alternate energy plane with 6 people from point A to B at 150 km/h around 500-600 km in 10 years time.
😉
If not sooner; http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Electric_aircraft
G4 is 4 seater; http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fNn_9xRxWro
takes 4 people 200 miles on a single charge; http://www.popsci.com/bown/2011/product/pipistrel-taurus-g4
Where this all leads ?
I mean the only way to fly with weak power fast is low drag and lite weight of the ac.
You can easily make the planes lighter when they only need to go 200-250 km/h. But you ought to get 20-26 kg/m2 the wing loading to fly at high with pedalling power…and you need electric power first to get there.
This could at least slow the ending of the oil and gas if substitute ways to travel were introduced in large scale.
Aerodynamics research of the slow flight seemed to have ended in 1963 on the FX 63-137 foil. I managed to get much better figures on my own foil design in both lower drag and higher lift with 17% thickness. It took me 2 months on a XFRL5 program at home.
New innovations on the conceptual level are also needed I presume.
Aero Ae-45 seems to be the only aircraft than can reach with 3 people extra seats to the 787 Dreamliner 100 pmpg level today; http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Aero_Ae-45 and http://www.flugzeuginfo.net/acdata_php/acdata_ae45_en.php
Thanks for your quick answer Garry !
You charge the batteries in a charger on the ground…and via solar power above the clouds during day lite !
For nite flying you’d need an extra portion of the day lite saved energy…if possibly able to pedal the plane few hours before the sun sets ( or use the thermals like sail planes do ). Othervise…no nite flying.
There is a song in finnish..nuclear power is harmless only here ( by Eput..here are the words too; http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bogkZNz1ag4 ).
Plastic can be substituted with renewable materials like plywood and carbon to an extent with new kinda glues like Masterbond and T88 etc.
rgds,
Juke
wot iz this ?
Here goes !